Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Katsumi Inagaki
dblp:74/5624
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
software effort estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Analyzing Effects of Cost Estimation Accuracy on Quality and Productivity · ICSE 1998 |
Empirical software engineering › software economics
software productivity |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Analyzing Effects of Cost Estimation Accuracy on Quality and Productivity · ICSE 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical hypothesis testing · 0.0correlation analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | Statistical analysis of deviation of actual cost from estimated cost using actual project data
Osamu Mizuno, Tohru Kikuno, Katsumi Inagaki, Yasunari Takagi, Keishi Sakamoto |
Inf. Softw. Technol. | 3 |
| 1998 | Analyzing Effects of Cost Estimation Accuracy on Quality and ProductivityabstractThis paper discusses the effects of estimation accuracy for software development cost on both the quality of the delivered code and the productivity of the development team. The estimation accuracy is measured by metric RE (relative error). The quality and productivity are measured by metrics FQ (field quality) and TP (team productivity). Using actual project data on thirty-one projects at a certain company, the following are verified by correlation analysis and testing of statistical hypotheses. There is a high correlation between the faithfulness of the development plan to standards and the value of RE (a coefficient of correlation between them is -0.60). Both FQ and TP are significantly different between projects with -10%<RE<+10% and projects with RE/spl ges/+10% (the level of significance is chosen as 0.05). Osamu Mizuno, Tohru Kikuno, Katsumi Inagaki, Yasunari Takagi, Keishi Sakamoto |
ICSE | 3 |