Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pan Du 0002
dblp:74/5694-2
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7335-4078ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Learning paradigms · 38% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14% Efficient and distributed learning · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 56% Information retrieval · 44% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
class distribution mismatch |
2.4 | 3 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Semi-Supervised Learning Under Class Distribution Mismatch · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch · ICML 2025 Semi-Supervised Learning via Weight-aware Distillation under Class Distribution Mismatch · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Semi-Supervised Learning Under Class Distribution Mismatch · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Semi-Supervised Learning via Weight-aware Distillation under Class Distribution Mismatch · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.4 | 3 | 2023 | Semi-Supervised Learning via Weight-aware Distillation under Class Distribution Mismatch · ICCV 2023 Contrastive Coding for Active Learning under Class Distribution Mismatch · ICCV 2021 Contrastive Active Learning Under Class Distribution Mismatch · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Contrastive Active Learning Under Class Distribution Mismatch · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 Contrastive Coding for Active Learning under Class Distribution Mismatch · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
excess risk analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Semi-Supervised Learning Under Class Distribution Mismatch · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › open-world recognition
open-set recognition |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
unsupervised learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch · ICML 2025 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Clustering via Targeted Representation Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Information retrieval › user interaction › personalization
personalized clustering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Clustering via Targeted Representation Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Semi-Supervised Learning via Weight-aware Distillation under Class Distribution Mismatch · ICCV 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › contrastive feature learning
contrastive embedding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Contrastive Coding for Active Learning under Class Distribution Mismatch · ICCV 2021 |
Data mining › clustering
constrained clustering |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Personalized Clustering via Targeted Representation Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
pseudo-labeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Semi-Supervised Learning via Weight-aware Distillation under Class Distribution Mismatch · ICCV 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
constrained contrastive loss · 1.7attention mechanism · 1.7active queries · 1.7pseudo-labeling · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.2positive-negative pair construction · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9bi-objective optimization · 0.9point mutual information · 0.7contrastive representation learning · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Personalized Clustering via Targeted Representation LearningabstractClustering traditionally aims to reveal a natural grouping structure within unlabeled data. However, this structure may not always align with users' preferences. In this paper, we propose a personalized clustering method that explicitly performs targeted representation learning by interacting with users via modicum task information (e.g., must-link or cannot-link pairs) to guide the clustering direction. We query users with the most informative pairs, i.e., those pairs most hard to cluster and those most easy to miscluster, to facilitate the representation learning in terms of the clustering preference. Moreover, by exploiting attention mechanism, the targeted representation is learned and augmented. By leveraging the targeted representation and constrained contrastive loss as well, personalized clustering is obtained. Theoretically, we verify that the risk of personalized clustering is tightly bounded, guaranteeing that active queries to users do mitigate the clustering risk. Experimentally, extensive results show that our method performs well across different clustering tasks and datasets, even when only a limited number of queries are available. Xiwen Geng, Suyun Zhao, Borui Peng, Pan Du 0002, Hong Chen 0001, Cuiping Li 0001, Mengdie Wang |
AAAI | 5 |
| 2025 | Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution MismatchabstractClass distribution mismatch (CDM) refers to the discrepancy between class distributions in training data and target tasks. Previous methods address this by designing classifiers to categorize classes known during training, while grouping unknown or new classes into an "other" category. However, they focus on semi-supervised scenarios and heavily rely on labeled data, limiting their applicability and performance.
To address this, we propose Unsupervised Learning for Class Distribution Mismatch (UCDM), which constructs positive-negative pairs from unlabeled data for classifier training. Our approach randomly samples images and uses a diffusion model to add or erase semantic classes, synthesizing diverse training pairs. Additionally, we introduce a confidence-based labeling mechanism that iteratively assigns pseudo-labels to valuable real-world data and incorporates them into the training process.
Extensive experiments on three datasets demonstrate UCDM’s superiority over previous semi-supervised methods. Specifically, with a 60\% mismatch proportion on Tiny-ImageNet dataset, our approach, without relying on labeled data, surpasses OpenMatch (with 40 labels per class) by 35.1%, 63.7%, and 72.5% in classifying known, unknown, and new classes. Pan Du 0002, Wangbo Zhao, Xinai Lu, Zhikai Li, Chaoyu Gong, Suyun Zhao, Hong Chen 0001, Cuiping Li 0001, Kai Wang 0036, Yang You 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2025 | Towards a Theoretical Understanding of Semi-Supervised Learning Under Class Distribution MismatchabstractSemi-supervised learning (SSL) confronts a formidable challenge under class distribution mismatch, wherein unlabeled data contain numerous categories absent in the labeled dataset. Traditional SSL methods undergo performance deterioration in such mismatch scenarios due to the invasion of those instances from unknown categories. Despite some technical efforts to enhance SSL by mitigating the invasion, the profound theoretical analysis of SSL under class distribution mismatch is still under study. Accordingly, in this work, we propose Bi-Objective Optimization Mechanism (BOOM) to theoretically analyze the excess risk between the empirical optimal solution and the population-level optimal solution. Specifically, BOOM reveals that the SSL error is the essential contributor behind excess risk, resulting from both the pseudo-labeling error and invasion error. Meanwhile, BOOM unveils that the optimization objectives of SSL under mismatch are binary: high-quality pseudo-labels and adaptive weights on the unlabeled instances, which contribute to alleviating the pseudo-labeling error and the invasion error, respectively. Moreover, BOOM explicitly discovers the fundamental factors crucial for optimizing the bi-objectives, guided by which an approach is then proposed as a strong baseline for SSL under mismatch. Extensive experiments on benchmark and real datasets confirm the effectiveness of our proposed algorithm. Pan Du 0002, Suyun Zhao, Puhui Tan, Zisen Sheng, Zeyu Gan, Hong Chen 0001, Cuiping Li 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2023 | Semi-Supervised Learning via Weight-aware Distillation under Class Distribution MismatchabstractSemi-Supervised Learning (SSL) under class distribution mismatch aims to tackle a challenging problem wherein unlabeled data contain lots of unknown categories unseen in the labeled ones. In such mismatch scenarios, traditional SSL suffers severe performance damage due to the harmful invasion of the instances with unknown categories into the target classifier. In this study, by strict mathematical reasoning, we reveal that the SSL error under class distribution mismatch is composed of pseudo-labeling error and invasion error, both of which jointly bound the SSL population risk. To alleviate the SSL error, we propose a robust SSL framework called Weight-Aware Distillation (WAD) that, by weights, selectively transfers knowledge beneficial to the target task from unsupervised contrastive representation to the target classifier. Specifically, WAD captures adaptive weights and high-quality pseudo-labels to target instances by exploring point mutual information (PMI) in representation space to maximize the role of unlabeled data and filter unknown categories. Theoretically, we prove that WAD has a tight upper bound of population risk under class distribution mismatch. Experimentally, extensive results demonstrate that WAD outperforms five state-of-the-art SSL approaches and one standard baseline on two benchmark datasets, CIFAR10 and CIFAR100, and an artificial cross-dataset. The code is available at https://github.com/RUC-DWBI-ML/research/tree/main/WAD-master. Pan Du 0002, Suyun Zhao, Zisen Sheng, Cuiping Li 0001, Hong Chen 0001 |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2023 | Contrastive Active Learning Under Class Distribution MismatchabstractActive learning(AL) has been successful based on the premise that labeled and unlabeled data come from the same class distribution. However, its performance undergoes a severe deterioration under class distribution mismatch, wherein the unlabeled data contain numerous instances out of the class distribution of labeled data. In this article, we solve this practical yet rarely studied problem by minimizing the AL error, which is formally defined and decomposed as the valid query error and invalid query error. Specifically, the invalid query error is associated with the queries from unknown categories, and the valid query error is attributed to less informative queries from target categories. In light of this discovery, we propose a contrastive AL framework, named ConAL, to simultaneously learn the semantics and distinctiveness of the instances by contrastive techniques, thereby reducing the invalid query error and valid query error, respectively. Theoretically, we prove that the AL error of ConAL has a tight upper bound. Experimentally, ConAL achieves superior performance on two benchmark datasets, CIFAR10 and CIFAR100, and a cross-dataset with class distribution across multi-datasets. Furthermore, we validate that the ConAL technique performs admirably even on the realistic dataset. To the best of our knowledge, ConAL is the first AL work for class distribution mismatch. Pan Du 0002, Suyun Zhao, Shuwen Chai, Hong Chen 0001, Cuiping Li 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2021 | Contrastive Coding for Active Learning under Class Distribution MismatchabstractActive learning (AL) is successful based on the assumption that labeled and unlabeled data are obtained from the same class distribution. However, its performance deteriorates under class distribution mismatch, wherein the un-labeled data contain many samples out of the class distribution of labeled data. To effectively handle the problems under class distribution mismatch, we propose a contrastive coding based AL framework named CCAL. Unlike the existing AL methods that focus on selecting the most informative samples for annotating, CCAL extracts both semantic and distinctive features by contrastive learning and combines them in a query strategy to choose the most informative un-labeled samples with matched categories. Theoretically, we prove that the AL error of CCAL has a tight upper bound. Experimentally, we evaluate its performance on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and an artificial cross-dataset that consists of five datasets; consequently, CCAL achieves state-of-the-art performance by a large margin with remarkably lower annotation cost. To the best of our knowledge, CCAL is the first work related to AL for class distribution mismatch. Pan Du 0002, Suyun Zhao, Shuwen Chai, Hong Chen 0001, Cuiping Li 0001 |
ICCV | 1 |