Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pan Du 0004

dblp:74/5694-4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
0000-0002-4561-6883ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 5 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › microarray data preprocessing
microarray data processing
0.112008
lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray · Bioinform. 2008
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
mass spectrometry data analysis
0.112006
Improved peak detection in mass spectrum by incorporating continuous wavelet transform-based pattern matching · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › ChIP-seq analysis
peak detection
0.112006
Improved peak detection in mass spectrum by incorporating continuous wavelet transform-based pattern matching · Bioinform. 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biomarker discovery
disease-gene association
0.012009
From disease ontology to disease-ontology lite: statistical methods to adapt a general-purpose ontology for the test of gene-ontology associations · Bioinform. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic similarity · 0.1fuzzy clustering · 0.1binary distance metrics · 0.1variance-stabilizing transformation · 0.1normalization · 0.1pattern matching · 0.1continuous wavelet transform · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Comparison of Beta-value and M-value methods for quantifying methylation levels by microarray analysis
abstract
BACKGROUND: High-throughput profiling of DNA methylation status of CpG islands is crucial to understand the epigenetic regulation of genes. The microarray-based Infinium methylation assay by Illumina is one platform for low-cost high-throughput methylation profiling. Both Beta-value and M-value statistics have been used as metrics to measure methylation levels. However, there are no detailed studies of their relations and their strengths and limitations. RESULTS: We demonstrate that the relationship between the Beta-value and M-value methods is a Logit transformation, and show that the Beta-value method has severe heteroscedasticity for highly methylated or unmethylated CpG sites. In order to evaluate the performance of the Beta-value and M-value methods for identifying differentially methylated CpG sites, we designed a methylation titration experiment. The evaluation results show that the M-value method provides much better performance in terms of Detection Rate (DR) and True Positive Rate (TPR) for both highly methylated and unmethylated CpG sites. Imposing a minimum threshold of difference can improve the performance of the M-value method but not the Beta-value method. We also provide guidance for how to select the threshold of methylation differences. CONCLUSIONS: The Beta-value has a more intuitive biological interpretation, but the M-value is more statistically valid for the differential analysis of methylation levels. Therefore, we recommend using the M-value method for conducting differential methylation analysis and including the Beta-value statistics when reporting the results to investigators.
Pan Du 0004, Chiang-Ching Huang, Nadereh Jafari, Warren A. Kibbe, Lifang Hou, Simon M. Lin
BMC Bioinform.1
2009 From disease ontology to disease-ontology lite: statistical methods to adapt a general-purpose ontology for the test of gene-ontology associations
abstract
Subjective methods have been reported to adapt a general-purpose ontology for a specific application. For example, Gene Ontology (GO) Slim was created from GO to generate a highly aggregated report of the human-genome annotation. We propose statistical methods to adapt the general purpose, OBO Foundry Disease Ontology (DO) for the identification of gene-disease associations. Thus, we need a simplified definition of disease categories derived from implicated genes. On the basis of the assumption that the DO terms having similar associated genes are closely related, we group the DO terms based on the similarity of gene-to-DO mapping profiles. Two types of binary distance metrics are defined to measure the overall and subset similarity between DO terms. A compactness-scalable fuzzy clustering method is then applied to group similar DO terms. To reduce false clustering, the semantic similarities between DO terms are also used to constrain clustering results. As such, the DO terms are aggregated and the redundant DO terms are largely removed. Using these methods, we constructed a simplified vocabulary list from the DO called Disease Ontology Lite (DOLite). We demonstrated that DOLite results in more interpretable results than DO for gene-disease association tests. The resultant DOLite has been used in the Functional Disease Ontology (FunDO) Web application at http://www.projects.bioinformatics.northwestern.edu/fundo.
Pan Du 0004, Jared Flatow, Michelle Holko, Warren A. Kibbe, Simon M. Lin
Bioinform.1
2008 lumi: a pipeline for processing Illumina microarray
abstract
UNLABELLED: Illumina microarray is becoming a popular microarray platform. The BeadArray technology from Illumina makes its preprocessing and quality control different from other microarray technologies. Unfortunately, most other analyses have not taken advantage of the unique properties of the BeadArray system, and have just incorporated preprocessing methods originally designed for Affymetrix microarrays. lumi is a Bioconductor package especially designed to process the Illumina microarray data. It includes data input, quality control, variance stabilization, normalization and gene annotation portions. In specific, the lumi package includes a variance-stabilizing transformation (VST) algorithm that takes advantage of the technical replicates available on every Illumina microarray. Different normalization method options and multiple quality control plots are provided in the package. To better annotate the Illumina data, a vendor independent nucleotide universal identifier (nuID) was devised to identify the probes of Illumina microarray. The nuID annotation packages and output of lumi processed results can be easily integrated with other Bioconductor packages to construct a statistical data analysis pipeline for Illumina data. AVAILABILITY: The lumi Bioconductor package, www.bioconductor.org
Pan Du 0004, Warren A. Kibbe, Simon M. Lin
Bioinform.1
2007 Application of Wavelet Transform to the MS-based Proteomics Data Preprocessing
abstract
Mass spectrometry (MS) has become one of the major detection technologies for high-throughput proteomics. The preprocessing of mass spectra is crucial for its subsequent analysis like biomarker discovery or protein identification. Wavelet transform is gradually becoming an important methodology in the MS data preprocessing. This paper reviews the application of wavelet transforms in quality control, smoothing and peak detection of MS data preprocessing. It also proposes an improved Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) smoothing algorithm, which utilizes the cross-level DWT coefficients information during smoothing. Most of the algorithms described in this paper are included or will be included in the BioconductorMassSpecWaveletpackage.
Pan Du 0004, Simon M. Lin, Warren A. Kibbe, Haihui Wang
BIBE1
2006 Improved peak detection in mass spectrum by incorporating continuous wavelet transform-based pattern matching
abstract
MOTIVATION: A major problem for current peak detection algorithms is that noise in mass spectrometry (MS) spectra gives rise to a high rate of false positives. The false positive rate is especially problematic in detecting peaks with low amplitudes. Usually, various baseline correction algorithms and smoothing methods are applied before attempting peak detection. This approach is very sensitive to the amount of smoothing and aggressiveness of the baseline correction, which contribute to making peak detection results inconsistent between runs, instrumentation and analysis methods. RESULTS: Most peak detection algorithms simply identify peaks based on amplitude, ignoring the additional information present in the shape of the peaks in a spectrum. In our experience, 'true' peaks have characteristic shapes, and providing a shape-matching function that provides a 'goodness of fit' coefficient should provide a more robust peak identification method. Based on these observations, a continuous wavelet transform (CWT)-based peak detection algorithm has been devised that identifies peaks with different scales and amplitudes. By transforming the spectrum into wavelet space, the pattern-matching problem is simplified and in addition provides a powerful technique for identifying and separating the signal from the spike noise and colored noise. This transformation, with the additional information provided by the 2D CWT coefficients can greatly enhance the effective signal-to-noise ratio. Furthermore, with this technique no baseline removal or peak smoothing preprocessing steps are required before peak detection, and this improves the robustness of peak detection under a variety of conditions. The algorithm was evaluated with SELDI-TOF spectra with known polypeptide positions. Comparisons with two other popular algorithms were performed. The results show the CWT-based algorithm can identify both strong and weak peaks while keeping false positive rate low. AVAILABILITY: The algorithm is implemented in R and will be included as an open source module in the Bioconductor project.
Pan Du 0004, Warren A. Kibbe, Simon M. Lin
Bioinform.1