Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

McKenzie Jones-Rounds

dblp:74/7981 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Health and well-being technologies · 44% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 44% Collaborative and social computing · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Health and well-being technologies › elderly care
aging in place
0.112010
Independence and interaction: understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place · CHI 2010
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › smart home
home monitoring
0.112010
Independence and interaction: understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place · CHI 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interview study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 Independence and interaction: understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place
abstract
As America's baby boom population gets older, aging in place -- the idea that seniors can remain independent in a comfortable home environment while being monitored and receiving care from family and caregivers living elsewhere -- has received significant attention. Fostering a sense of independence while simultaneously enabling monitoring and frequent interaction can seem paradoxical, however. This raises questions of how we can design technologies that help seniors retain their independence and a sense of comfort, while still interacting with and being monitored regularly by others. We present results from an interview study of 30 seniors, caregivers and relatives in which we sought to understand how they managed their interactions, availability, privacy and independence. Results suggest that they rely on attributes of the physical environment, temporal structures such as routine conversations and activities, and technological mediation.
Jeremy P. Birnholtz, McKenzie Jones-Rounds
CHI2