Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthew D. Pearson

dblp:75/1902 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation › gene prediction
comparative gene finding
0.112006
Comparative Gene Prediction using Conditional Random Fields · NIPS 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
gene prediction
0.112006
Comparative Gene Prediction using Conditional Random Fields · NIPS 2006
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence modeling
sequence labeling
0.112006
Comparative Gene Prediction using Conditional Random Fields · NIPS 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

phylogenetic generalized hidden markov model · 0.1discriminative training · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Comparative Gene Prediction using Conditional Random Fields
abstract
Computational gene prediction using generative models has reached a plateau, with several groups converging to a generalized hidden Markov model (GHMM) incorporating phylogenetic models of nucleotide sequence evolution. Further improvements in gene calling accuracy are likely to come through new methods that incorporate additional data, both comparative and species specific. Conditional Random Fields (CRFs), which directly model the conditional probability P (y |x) of a vector of hidden states conditioned on a set of observations, provide a unified framework for combining probabilistic and non-probabilistic information and have been shown to outperform HMMs on sequence labeling tasks in natural language processing. We describe the use of CRFs for comparative gene prediction. We implement a model that encapsulates both a phylogenetic-GHMM (our baseline comparative model) and additional non-probabilistic features. We tested our model on the genome sequence of the fungal human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans. Our baseline comparative model displays accuracy comparable to the the best available gene prediction tool for this organism. Moreover, we show that discriminative training and the incorporation of non-probabilistic evidence significantly improve performance. Our software implementation, Conrad, is freely available with an open source license at http://www.broad.mit.edu/annotation/conrad/.
Jade P. Vinson, Dave DeCaprio, Matthew D. Pearson, Stacey Luoma, James E. Galagan
NIPS3