Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhitao He 0001

dblp:75/2800-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0003-3317-1260ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Vision and language · 35% Trustworthy machine learning · 34% Language models and text generation · 29%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal hallucination
knowledge boundary awareness
1.722025
MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness · EMNLP 2025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
mathematical reasoning
1.012026
Mathematical Proof as a Litmus Test: Revealing Failure Modes of Advanced Large Reasoning Models · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › evaluation of language models
reasoning evaluation
1.012026
Mathematical Proof as a Litmus Test: Revealing Failure Modes of Advanced Large Reasoning Models · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
confidence calibration
0.912025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
confidence estimation
0.912025
MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation
0.912025
MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness · EMNLP 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model
0.912025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
multimodal reasoning
0.912025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and calibration
0.912025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
LLM unlearning
0.812024
RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning › machine unlearning
knowledge unlearning
0.812024
RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
machine unlearning
0.812024
RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference
0.812024
RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward design
0.312025
MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

membership inference attack · 1.5adversarial probing · 1.5large reasoning model · 1.0benchmark evaluation · 1.0supervised fine-tuning · 0.9reinforcement learning with multiple reward functions · 0.9instruction tuning · 0.9fine-tuning · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Mathematical Proof as a Litmus Test: Revealing Failure Modes of Advanced Large Reasoning Models
abstract
Dadi Guo, Jiayu Liu, Zhiyuan Fan, Zhitao He, Haoran Li, Yuxin Li, Yumeng Wang, Yi R. Fung. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Dadi Guo, Zhiyuan Fan, Zhitao He 0001, Yumeng Wang 0010, Yi R. Fung 0001
ACL (1)4
2025 MMBoundary: Advancing MLLM Knowledge Boundary Awareness through Reasoning Step Confidence Calibration
abstract
In recent years, multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant progress but continue to face inherent challenges in multimodal reasoning, which requires multi-level (e.g., perception, reasoning) and multi-granular (e.g., multi-step reasoning chain) advanced inferencing.Prior work on estimating model confidence tends to focus on the overall response for training and calibration, but fails to assess confidence in each reasoning step, leading to undesirable hallucination snowballing.In this work, we present MMBoundary, a novel framework that advances the knowledge boundary awareness of MLLMs through reasoning step confidence calibration.To achieve this, we propose to incorporate complementary textual and cross-modal self-rewarding signals to estimate confidence at each step of the MLLM reasoning process.In addition to supervised fine-tuning MLLM on this set of self-rewarding confidence estimation signal for initial confidence expression warm-up, we introduce a reinforcement learning stage with multiple reward functions for further aligning model knowledge and calibrating confidence at each reasoning step, enhancing reasoning chain self-correction.Empirical results show that MMBoundary significantly outperforms existing methods across diverse domain datasets and metrics, achieving an average of 7.5% reduction in multimodal confidence calibration errors and up to 8.3% improvement in task performance 1 .
Zhitao He 0001, Sandeep Polisetty, Zhiyuan Fan, Shujin Wu, Yi R. Fung 0001
ACL (1)1
2025 MAC-Tuning: LLM Multi-Compositional Problem Reasoning with Enhanced Knowledge Boundary Awareness
abstract
The hallucination of non-existent facts by LLMs is an important problem given its widespread adoption across various applications.Previous research addresses this problem by analyzing the internal parameterized knowledge boundaries to estimate confidence.However, these studies focus on the single-problem setting and have not explored the more challenging multi-problem setting, which requires accurately answering multiple questions simultaneously.We introduce a novel method for the multi-problem setting, Multiple Answers and Confidence Stepwise Tuning (MAC-Tuning), that separates the learning of answer prediction and confidence estimation during fine-tuning on instruction data.Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method outperforms baselines by up to 25% in average precision.
Zhitao He 0001, Sandeep Polisetty, Qingyun Wang 0005, Yi R. Fung 0001
EMNLP2
2024 Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Document-Level Event Causality Identification with Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Transfer Learning
abstract
Event Causality Identification (ECI) refers to the detection of causal relations between events in texts. However, most existing studies focus on sentence-level ECI with high-resource languages, leaving more challenging document-level ECI (DECI) with low-resource languages under-explored. In this paper, we propose a Heterogeneous Graph Interaction Model with Multi-granularity Contrastive Transfer Learning (GIMC) for zero-shot cross-lingual document-level ECI. Specifically, we introduce a heterogeneous graph interaction network to model the long-distance dependencies between events that are scattered over a document. Then, to improve cross-lingual transferability of causal knowledge learned from the source language, we propose a multi-granularity contrastive transfer learning module to align the causal representations across languages. Extensive experiments show our framework outperforms the previous state-of-the-art model by 9.4% and 8.2% of average F1 score on monolingual and multilingual scenarios respectively. Notably, in the multilingual scenario, our zero-shot framework even exceeds GPT-3.5 with few-shot learning by 24.3% in overall performance.
Zhitao He 0001, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen 0001, Kang Liu 0001, Mengshu Sun, Jun Zhao 0001
LREC/COLING1
2024 RWKU: Benchmarking Real-World Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) inevitably memorize sensitive, copyrighted, and harmful knowledge from the training corpus; therefore, it is crucial to erase this knowledge from the models. Machine unlearning is a promising solution for efficiently removing specific knowledge by post hoc modifying models. In this paper, we propose a Real-World Knowledge Unlearning benchmark (RWKU) for LLM unlearning. RWKU is designed based on the following three key factors: (1) For the task setting, we consider a more practical and challenging unlearning setting, where neither the forget corpus nor the retain corpus is accessible. (2) For the knowledge source, we choose 200 real-world famous people as the unlearning targets and show that such popular knowledge is widely present in various LLMs. (3) For the evaluation framework, we design the forget set and the retain set to evaluate the model’s capabilities across various real-world applications. Regarding the forget set, we provide four four membership inference attack (MIA) methods and nine kinds of adversarial attack probes to rigorously test unlearning efficacy. Regarding the retain set, we assess locality and utility in terms of neighbor perturbation, general ability, reasoning ability, truthfulness, factuality, and fluency. We conduct extensive experiments across two unlearning scenarios, two models and six baseline methods and obtain some meaningful findings. We release our benchmark and code publicly at http://rwku-bench.github.io for future work.
Zhuoran Jin, Chenhao Wang 0004, Zhitao He 0001, Hongbang Yuan, Yubo Chen 0001, Kang Liu 0001, Jun Zhao 0001
NeurIPS4