Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lei Guan 0001
dblp:75/4038-1
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-9041-3244ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 63% Optimization for machine learning · 18% Deep learning architectures and training · 18% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
asynchronous training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PipeOptim: Ensuring Effective 1F1B Schedule With Optimizer-Dependent Weight Prediction · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PipeOptim: Ensuring Effective 1F1B Schedule With Optimizer-Dependent Weight Prediction · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › model parallelism
pipeline parallelism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PipeOptim: Ensuring Effective 1F1B Schedule With Optimizer-Dependent Weight Prediction · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient-based optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | XGrad: Boosting Gradient-Based Optimizers With Weight Prediction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
training convergence |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | XGrad: Boosting Gradient-Based Optimizers With Weight Prediction · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
convergence analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Non-Ergodic Convergence Analysis of Heavy-Ball Algorithms · AAAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Non-Ergodic Convergence Analysis of Heavy-Ball Algorithms · AAAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Non-Ergodic Convergence Analysis of Heavy-Ball Algorithms · AAAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › gradient descent
heavy-ball method |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Non-Ergodic Convergence Analysis of Heavy-Ball Algorithms · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weight prediction · 0.91f1b schedule · 0.9adamw · 0.8adam3 · 0.8adam · 0.8adabelief · 0.8SGD with momentum · 0.8stochastic update rules · 0.4non-ergodic convergence analysis · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | A Curvature-Aware Dynamic Weight Prediction Method for AdamW
Yuqiao Xu, Lei Guan 0001, Xingkui Wang, Yongle Chen |
ICIC (5) | 2 |
| 2025 | PipeOptim: Ensuring Effective 1F1B Schedule With Optimizer-Dependent Weight PredictionabstractAsynchronous pipeline model parallelism with a “1F1B” (one forward, one backward) schedule generates little bubble overhead and always provides quite a high throughput. However, the “1F1B” schedule inevitably leads to weight inconsistency and weight staleness issues due to the cross-training of different mini-batches across GPUs. To simultaneously address these two problems, in this paper, we propose an optimizer-dependent weight prediction strategy (a.k.a PipeOptim) for asynchronous pipeline training. The key insight of our proposal is that we employ a weight prediction strategy in the forward pass to approximately ensure that each mini-batch uses consistent and staleness-free weights to compute the forward pass of the “1F1B” schedule. To be concrete, we first construct the weight prediction scheme based on the update rule of the used optimizer when training the deep neural network models. Then throughout the “1F1B” pipeline training, each mini-batch is mandated to execute weight prediction, subsequently employing the predicted weights to perform the forward pass. As a result, PipeOptim 1) inherits the advantage of the “1F1B” schedule and generates high throughput, and 2) can ensure effective parameter learning regardless of the type of the used optimizer. We conducted extensive experimental evaluations using nine different deep-learning models to verify the effectiveness of our proposal. The experiment results demonstrate that PipeOptim outperforms the other five popular pipeline approaches including GPipe, PipeDream, PipeDream-2BW, SpecTrain, and XPipe. Lei Guan 0001, Dongsheng Li 0001, Yongle Chen, Jiye Liang, Wenjian Wang 0001, Xicheng Lu |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |
| 2024 | XGrad: Boosting Gradient-Based Optimizers With Weight PredictionabstractIn this paper, we propose a general deep learning training framework XGrad which introduces weight prediction into the popular gradient-based optimizers to boost their convergence and generalization when training the deep neural network (DNN) models. In particular, ahead of each mini-batch training, the future weights are predicted according to the update rule of the used optimizer and are then applied to both the forward pass and backward propagation. In this way, during the whole training period, the optimizer always utilizes the gradients w.r.t. the future weights to update the DNN parameters, making the gradient-based optimizer achieve better convergence and generalization compared to the original optimizer without weight prediction. XGrad is rather straightforward to implement yet pretty effective in boosting the convergence of gradient-based optimizers and the accuracy of DNN models. Empirical results concerning five popular optimizers including SGD with momentum, Adam, AdamW, AdaBelief, and AdaM3 demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposal. The experimental results validate that XGrad can attain higher model accuracy than the baseline optimizers when training the DNN models. Lei Guan 0001, Dongsheng Li 0001, Yanqi Shi, Jian Meng |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2023 | Weight Prediction Boosts the Convergence of AdamW
Lei Guan 0001 |
PAKDD (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | pdlADMM: An ADMM-based framework for parallel deep learning training with efficiency
Lei Guan 0001, Zhi-hui Yang, Dongsheng Li 0001, Xicheng Lu |
Neurocomputing | 1 |
| 2020 | An efficient parallel and distributed solution to nonconvex penalized linear SVMsabstractSupport vector machines (SVMs) have been recognized as a powerful tool to perform linear classification. When combined with the sparsity-inducing nonconvex penalty, SVMs can perform classification and variable selection simultaneously. However, the nonconvex penalized SVMs in general cannot be solved globally and efficiently due to their nondifferentiability, nonconvexity, and nonsmoothness. Existing solutions to the nonconvex penalized SVMs typically solve this problem in a serial fashion, which are unable to fully use the parallel computing power of modern multi-core machines. On the other hand, the fact that many real-world data are stored in a distributed manner urgently calls for a parallel and distributed solution to the nonconvex penalized SVMs. To circumvent this challenge, we propose an efficient alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) based algorithm that solves the nonconvex penalized SVMs in a parallel and distributed way. We design many useful techniques to decrease the computation and synchronization cost of the proposed parallel algorithm. The time complexity analysis demonstrates the low time complexity of the proposed parallel algorithm. Moreover, the convergence of the parallel algorithm is guaranteed. Experimental evaluations on four LIBSVM benchmark datasets demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed parallel algorithm. Lei Guan 0001, Tao Sun 0005, Linbo Qiao, Zhi-hui Yang, Dongsheng Li 0001, Ke-shi Ge, Xicheng Lu |
Frontiers Inf. Technol. Electron. Eng. | 1 |
| 2019 | Non-Ergodic Convergence Analysis of Heavy-Ball AlgorithmsabstractIn this paper, we revisit the convergence of the Heavy-ball method, and present improved convergence complexity results in the convex setting. We provide the first non-ergodic O(1/k) rate result of the Heavy-ball algorithm with constant step size for coercive objective functions. For objective functions satisfying a relaxed strongly convex condition, the linear convergence is established under weaker assumptions on the step size and inertial parameter than made in the existing literature. We extend our results to multi-block version of the algorithm with both the cyclic and stochastic update rules. In addition, our results can also be extended to decentralized optimization, where the ergodic analysis is not applicable. Tao Sun 0005, Penghang Yin, Dongsheng Li 0001, Chun Huang 0006, Lei Guan 0001, Hao Jiang 0001 |
AAAI | 5 |