EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tinglin Huang 0001
dblp:75/507-1
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 4 first-author · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Graph learning · 26% Question answering and dialogue systems · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 55% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 45% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Recommender systems · 60% Information retrieval · 40% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics
electronic health records |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Experience Retrieval-Augmentation with Electronic Health Records Enables Accurate Discharge QA · ACL (1) 2026 |
Medical and health informatics › biomedical natural language processing
medical question answering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Experience Retrieval-Augmentation with Electronic Health Records Enables Accurate Discharge QA · ACL (1) 2026 |
Information retrieval
retrieval augmentation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Experience Retrieval-Augmentation with Electronic Health Records Enables Accurate Discharge QA · ACL (1) 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
spatial transcriptomics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Generation of Spatial Transcriptomics from Histology Images via Whole-Slide Flow Matching · ICML 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational structural biology
protein-nucleic acid interaction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Protein-Nucleic Acid Complex Modeling with Frame Averaging Transformer · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BatchSampler: Sampling Mini-Batches for Contrastive Learning in Vision, Language, and Graphs · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
mini-batch sampling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | BatchSampler: Sampling Mini-Batches for Contrastive Learning in Vision, Language, and Graphs · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › molecular representation learning
molecular graph learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning to Group Auxiliary Datasets for Molecule · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
negative transfer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning to Group Auxiliary Datasets for Molecule · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.7 | 2 | 2021 | MixGCF: An Improved Training Method for Graph Neural Network-based Recommender Systems · KDD 2021 Learning Intents behind Interactions with Knowledge Graph for Recommendation · WWW 2021 |
Recommender systems › graph-based recommendation
graph neural network recommendation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | MixGCF: An Improved Training Method for Graph Neural Network-based Recommender Systems · KDD 2021 |
Recommender systems › knowledge-aware recommendation
knowledge graph-based recommendation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Intents behind Interactions with Knowledge Graph for Recommendation · WWW 2021 |
Recommender systems › user modeling
user intent modeling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Intents behind Interactions with Knowledge Graph for Recommendation · WWW 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Generation of Spatial Transcriptomics from Histology Images via Whole-Slide Flow Matching · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
bilevel optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Learning to Group Auxiliary Datasets for Molecule · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
graph contrastive learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | BatchSampler: Sampling Mini-Batches for Contrastive Learning in Vision, Language, and Graphs · KDD 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retrieval-augmented generation · 3.0large language model · 3.0local spatial attention · 1.7flow matching · 1.7frame averaging · 0.8equivariant transformer · 0.8contact map prediction · 0.8routing mechanism · 0.7random walk with restart · 0.7proximity graph · 0.7meta-gradient · 0.7hard negative sampling · 0.7bi-level optimization · 0.7knowledge graph embedding · 0.5hop mixing · 0.5hard negative selection · 0.5graph neural network · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Experience Retrieval-Augmentation with Electronic Health Records Enables Accurate Discharge QAabstractJustice Ou, Tinglin Huang, Yilun Zhao, Ziyang Yu, Peiqing Lu, Yifei Shen, Rex Ying. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Justice Ou, Tinglin Huang 0001, Yilun Zhao 0001, Peiqing Lu, Yifei Shen 0006, Rex Ying |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | Scalable Generation of Spatial Transcriptomics from Histology Images via Whole-Slide Flow MatchingabstractSpatial transcriptomics (ST) has emerged as a powerful technology for bridging histology imaging with gene expression profiling. However, its application has been limited by low throughput and the need for specialized experimental facilities. Prior works sought to predict ST from whole-slide histology images to accelerate this process, but they suffer from two major limitations. First, they do not explicitly model cell-cell interaction as they factorize the joint distribution of whole-slide ST data and predict the gene expression of each spot independently. Second, their encoders struggle with memory constraints due to the large number of spots (often exceeding 10,000) in typical ST datasets. Herein, we propose STFlow, a flow matching generative model that considers cell-cell interaction by modeling the joint distribution of gene expression of an entire slide. It also employs an efficient slide-level encoder with local spatial attention, enabling whole-slide processing without excessive memory overhead. On the recently curated HEST-1k and STImage-1K4M benchmarks, STFlow substantially outperforms state-of-the-art baselines and achieves over 18% relative improvements over the pathology foundation models. Tinglin Huang 0001, Tianyu Liu 0005, Mehrtash Babadi, Wengong Jin, Rex Ying |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Protein-Nucleic Acid Complex Modeling with Frame Averaging TransformerabstractNucleic acid-based drugs like aptamers have recently demonstrated great therapeutic potential. However, experimental platforms for aptamer screening are costly, and the scarcity of labeled data presents a challenge for supervised methods to learn protein-aptamer binding. To this end, we develop an unsupervised learning approach based on the predicted pairwise contact map between a protein and a nucleic acid and demonstrate its effectiveness in protein-aptamer binding prediction. Our model is based on FAFormer, a novel equivariant transformer architecture that seamlessly integrates frame averaging (FA) within each transformer block. This integration allows our model to infuse geometric information into node features while preserving the spatial semantics of coordinates, leading to greater expressive power than standard FA models. Our results show that FAFormer outperforms existing equivariant models in contact map prediction across three protein complex datasets, with over 10% relative improvement. Moreover, we curate five real-world protein-aptamer interaction datasets and show that the contact map predicted by FAFormer serves as a strong binding indicator for aptamer screening. Tinglin Huang 0001, Zhenqiao Song, Rex Ying, Wengong Jin |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | HEART: Learning better representation of EHR data with a heterogeneous relation-aware transformer
Tinglin Huang 0001, Syed Asad Rizvi, Rohan Krishna Thakur, Vimig Socrates, Meili Gupta, David van Dijk, R. Andrew Taylor, Rex Ying |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 1 |
| 2023 | BatchSampler: Sampling Mini-Batches for Contrastive Learning in Vision, Language, and GraphsabstractIn-Batch contrastive learning is a state-of-the-art self-supervised method that brings semantically-similar instances close while pushing dissimilar instances apart within a mini-batch. Its key to success is the negative sharing strategy, in which every instance serves as a negative for the others within the mini-batch. Recent studies aim to improve performance by sampling hard negatives within the current mini-batch, whose quality is bounded by the mini-batch itself. In this work, we propose to improve contrastive learning by sampling mini-batches from the input data. We present BatchSampler\footnoteThe code is available at BatchSampler to sample mini-batches of hard-to-distinguish (i.e., hard and true negatives to each other) instances. To make each mini-batch have fewer false negatives, we design the proximity graph of randomly-selected instances. To form the mini-batch, we leverage random walk with restart on the proximity graph to help sample hard-to-distinguish instances. BatchSampler is a simple and general technique that can be directly plugged into existing contrastive learning models in vision, language, and graphs. Extensive experiments on datasets of three modalities show that BatchSampler can consistently improve the performance of powerful contrastive models, as shown by significant improvements of SimCLR on ImageNet-100, SimCSE on STS (language), and GraphCL and MVGRL on graph datasets. Zhen Yang 0034, Tinglin Huang 0001, Ming Ding 0004, Yuxiao Dong, Rex Ying, Yukuo Cen, Jie Tang 0001 |
KDD | 2 |
| 2023 | Learning to Group Auxiliary Datasets for MoleculeabstractThe limited availability of annotations in small molecule datasets presents a challenge to machine learning models. To address this, one common strategy is to collaborate with additional auxiliary datasets. However, having more data does not always guarantee improvements. Negative transfer can occur when the knowledge in the target dataset differs or contradicts that of the auxiliary molecule datasets. In light of this, identifying the auxiliary molecule datasets that can benefit the target dataset when jointly trained remains a critical and unresolved problem. Through an empirical analysis, we observe that combining graph structure similarity and task similarity can serve as a more reliable indicator for identifying high-affinity auxiliary datasets. Motivated by this insight, we propose MolGroup, which separates the dataset affinity into task and structure affinity to predict the potential benefits of each auxiliary molecule dataset. MolGroup achieves this by utilizing a routing mechanism optimized through a bi-level optimization framework. Empowered by the meta gradient, the routing mechanism is optimized toward maximizing the target dataset's performance and quantifies the affinity as the gating score. As a result, MolGroup is capable of predicting the optimal combination of auxiliary datasets for each target dataset. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the efficiency and effectiveness of MolGroup, showing an average improvement of 4.41%/3.47% for GIN/Graphormer trained with the group of molecule datasets selected by MolGroup on 11 target molecule datasets. Tinglin Huang 0001, Ziniu Hu, Rex Ying |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | MixGCF: An Improved Training Method for Graph Neural Network-based Recommender SystemsabstractGraph neural networks (GNNs) have recently emerged as state-of-the-art collaborative filtering (CF) solution. A fundamental challenge of CF is to distill negative signals from the implicit feedback, but negative sampling in GNN-based CF has been largely unexplored. In this work, we propose to study negative sampling by leveraging both the user-item graph structure and GNNs' aggregation process. We present the MixGCF method---a general negative sampling plugin that can be directly used to train GNN-based recommender systems. In MixGCF, rather than sampling raw negatives from data, we design the hop mixing technique to synthesize hard negatives. Specifically, the idea of hop mixing is to generate the synthetic negative by aggregating embeddings from different layers of raw negatives' neighborhoods. The layer and neighborhood selection process are optimized by a theoretically-backed hard selection strategy. Extensive experiments demonstrate that by using MixGCF, state-of-the-art GNN-based recommendation models can be consistently and significantly improved, e.g., 26% for NGCF and 22% for LightGCN in terms of [email protected] Tinglin Huang 0001, Yuxiao Dong, Ming Ding 0004, Zhen Yang 0034, Wenzheng Feng, Xinyu Wang 0001, Jie Tang 0001 |
KDD | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning Intents behind Interactions with Knowledge Graph for RecommendationabstractKnowledge graph (KG) plays an increasingly important role in recommender systems. A recent technical trend is to develop end-to-end models founded on graph neural networks (GNNs). However, existing GNN-based models are coarse-grained in relational modeling, failing to (1) identify user-item relation at a fine-grained level of intents, and (2) exploit relation dependencies to preserve the semantics of long-range connectivity. Xiang Wang 0010, Tinglin Huang 0001, Dingxian Wang, Yancheng Yuan, Zhenguang Liu, Xiangnan He 0001, Tat-Seng Chua |
WWW | 2 |