Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tinglin Huang 0002
dblp:75/507-2
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8345-7772ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning
negative sampling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Does Negative Sampling Matter? a Review With Insights Into its Theory and Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Does Negative Sampling Matter? a Review With Insights Into its Theory and Applications · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
negative sampling strategies · 0.8hard negative mining · 0.8GAN-based sampling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Does Negative Sampling Matter? a Review With Insights Into its Theory and ApplicationsabstractNegative sampling has swiftly risen to prominence as a focal point of research, with wide-ranging applications spanning machine learning, computer vision, natural language processing, data mining, and recommender systems. This surge in interest prompts us to question the fundamental impact of negative sampling: Does negative sampling really matter? Is there a general framework that can incorporate all negative sampling methods? In what fields is it applied? Addressing these questions, we propose a general framework that using negative sampling. Delving into the history of negative sampling, we chart its evolution across five distinct trajectories. We dissect and categorize the strategies used to select negative sample candidates, detailing global, local, mini-batch, hop, and memory-based approaches. Our comprehensive review extends to an analysis of current negative sampling methodologies, systematically grouping them into five classifications: static, hard, GAN-based, Auxiliary-based, and In-batch. Beyond detailed categorization, we explore the practical application of negative sampling across various fields. Finally, we briefly discuss open problems and future directions for negative sampling. Zhen Yang 0034, Ming Ding 0004, Tinglin Huang 0002, Yukuo Cen, Junshuai Song, Bin Xu 0001, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |