EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sheila M. Reynolds
dblp:75/5197
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 82% Computational social science and digital humanities · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
chromatin conformation |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Predicting Nucleosome Positioning Using Multiple Evidence Tracks · RECOMB 2010 On the Relationship between DNA Periodicity and Local Chromatin Structure · RECOMB 2009 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › chromatin analysis
nucleosome positioning |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Predicting Nucleosome Positioning Using Multiple Evidence Tracks · RECOMB 2010 On the Relationship between DNA Periodicity and Local Chromatin Structure · RECOMB 2009 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
forecasting |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Predicting Nucleosome Positioning Using Multiple Evidence Tracks · RECOMB 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
peptide identification |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Modeling peptide fragmentation with dynamic Bayesian networks for peptide identification · ISMB 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiple evidence integration · 0.2sequence analysis · 0.1support vector machine · 0.1dynamic bayesian network · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Predicting Nucleosome Positioning Using Multiple Evidence Tracks
Sheila M. Reynolds, Zhiping Weng, Jeff A. Bilmes, William Stafford Noble |
RECOMB | 1 |
| 2010 | Learning a Weighted Sequence Model of the Nucleosome Core and Linker Yields More Accurate Predictions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Homo sapiensabstractDNA in eukaryotes is packaged into a chromatin complex, the most basic element of which is the nucleosome. The precise positioning of the nucleosome cores allows for selective access to the DNA, and the mechanisms that control this positioning are important pieces of the gene expression puzzle. We describe a large-scale nucleosome pattern that jointly characterizes the nucleosome core and the adjacent linkers and is predominantly characterized by long-range oscillations in the mono, di- and tri-nucleotide content of the DNA sequence, and we show that this pattern can be used to predict nucleosome positions in both Homo sapiens and Saccharomyces cerevisiae more accurately than previously published methods. Surprisingly, in both H. sapiens and S. cerevisiae, the most informative individual features are the mono-nucleotide patterns, although the inclusion of di- and tri-nucleotide features results in improved performance. Our approach combines a much longer pattern than has been previously used to predict nucleosome positioning from sequence-301 base pairs, centered at the position to be scored-with a novel discriminative classification approach that selectively weights the contributions from each of the input features. The resulting scores are relatively insensitive to local AT-content and can be used to accurately discriminate putative dyad positions from adjacent linker regions without requiring an additional dynamic programming step and without the attendant edge effects and assumptions about linker length modeling and overall nucleosome density. Our approach produces the best dyad-linker classification results published to date in H. sapiens, and outperforms two recently published models on a large set of S. cerevisiae nucleosome positions. Our results suggest that in both genomes, a comparable and relatively small fraction of nucleosomes are well-positioned and that these positions are predictable based on sequence alone. We believe that the bulk of the remaining nucleosomes follow a statistical positioning model. Sheila M. Reynolds, Jeff A. Bilmes, William Stafford Noble |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2009 | On the Relationship between DNA Periodicity and Local Chromatin Structure
Sheila M. Reynolds, Jeff A. Bilmes, William Stafford Noble |
RECOMB | 1 |
| 2008 | Modeling peptide fragmentation with dynamic Bayesian networks for peptide identificationabstractMOTIVATION: Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is an indispensable technology for identification of proteins from complex mixtures. Proteins are digested to peptides that are then identified by their fragmentation patterns in the mass spectrometer. Thus, at its core, MS/MS protein identification relies on the relative predictability of peptide fragmentation. Unfortunately, peptide fragmentation is complex and not fully understood, and what is understood is not always exploited by peptide identification algorithms. RESULTS: We use a hybrid dynamic Bayesian network (DBN)/support vector machine (SVM) approach to address these two problems. We train a set of DBNs on high-confidence peptide-spectrum matches. These DBNs, known collectively as Riptide, comprise a probabilistic model of peptide fragmentation chemistry. Examination of the distributions learned by Riptide allows identification of new trends, such as prevalent a-ion fragmentation at peptide cleavage sites C-term to hydrophobic residues. In addition, Riptide can be used to produce likelihood scores that indicate whether a given peptide-spectrum match is correct. A vector of such scores is evaluated by an SVM, which produces a final score to be used in peptide identification. Using Riptide in this way yields improved discrimination when compared to other state-of-the-art MS/MS identification algorithms, increasing the number of positive identifications by as much as 12% at a 1% false discovery rate. AVAILABILITY: Python and C source code are available upon request from the authors. The curated training sets are available at http://noble.gs.washington.edu/proj/intense/. The Graphical Model Tool Kit (GMTK) is freely available at http://ssli.ee.washington.edu/bilmes/gmtk. Aaron A. Klammer, Sheila M. Reynolds, Jeff A. Bilmes, Michael J. MacCoss, William Stafford Noble |
ISMB | 2 |
| 2008 | Transmembrane Topology and Signal Peptide Prediction Using Dynamic Bayesian NetworksabstractHidden Markov models (HMMs) have been successfully applied to the tasks of transmembrane protein topology prediction and signal peptide prediction. In this paper we expand upon this work by making use of the more powerful class of dynamic Bayesian networks (DBNs). Our model, Philius, is inspired by a previously published HMM, Phobius, and combines a signal peptide submodel with a transmembrane submodel. We introduce a two-stage DBN decoder that combines the power of posterior decoding with the grammar constraints of Viterbi-style decoding. Philius also provides protein type, segment, and topology confidence metrics to aid in the interpretation of the predictions. We report a relative improvement of 13% over Phobius in full-topology prediction accuracy on transmembrane proteins, and a sensitivity and specificity of 0.96 in detecting signal peptides. We also show that our confidence metrics correlate well with the observed precision. In addition, we have made predictions on all 6.3 million proteins in the Yeast Resource Center (YRC) database. This large-scale study provides an overall picture of the relative numbers of proteins that include a signal-peptide and/or one or more transmembrane segments as well as a valuable resource for the scientific community. All DBNs are implemented using the Graphical Models Toolkit. Source code for the models described here is available at http://noble.gs.washington.edu/proj/philius. A Philius Web server is available at http://www.yeastrc.org/philius, and the predictions on the YRC database are available at http://www.yeastrc.org/pdr. Sheila M. Reynolds, Lukas Käll, Michael Riffle, Jeff A. Bilmes, William Stafford Noble |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |