Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James Diebel

dblp:75/5314 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 68% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 32%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Geometric modeling and processing · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.112006
A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms · CVPR (1) 2006
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
multi-view stereo
0.112006
A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms · CVPR (1) 2006
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction
bayesian surface reconstruction
0.112006
A Bayesian method for probable surface reconstruction and decimation · ACM Trans. Graph. 2006
Geometric modeling and processing
surface reconstruction
0.112006
A Bayesian method for probable surface reconstruction and decimation · ACM Trans. Graph. 2006
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.112006
A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms · CVPR (1) 2006
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth and range sensing
0.112005
An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range Sensing · NIPS 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.112005
An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range Sensing · NIPS 2005
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.112005
An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range Sensing · NIPS 2005
Computer vision › 3D vision › range image processing
range image super-resolution
0.112005
An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range Sensing · NIPS 2005
Geometric modeling and processing › mesh processing › mesh simplification
mesh decimation
0.012006
A Bayesian method for probable surface reconstruction and decimation · ACM Trans. Graph. 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

taxonomy · 0.1quantitative comparison · 0.1probabilistic model · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1markov random field · 0.1image fusion · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms
abstract
This paper presents a quantitative comparison of several multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. Until now, the lack of suitable calibrated multi-view image datasets with known ground truth (3D shape models) has prevented such direct comparisons. In this paper, we first survey multi-view stereo algorithms and compare them qualitatively using a taxonomy that differentiates their key properties. We then describe our process for acquiring and calibrating multiview image datasets with high-accuracy ground truth and introduce our evaluation methodology. Finally, we present the results of our quantitative comparison of state-of-the-art multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms on six benchmark datasets. The datasets, evaluation details, and instructions for submitting new models are available online at http://vision.middlebury.edu/mview.
Steven M. Seitz, Brian Curless, James Diebel, Daniel Scharstein, Richard Szeliski
CVPR (1)3
2006 A Bayesian method for probable surface reconstruction and decimation
abstract
We present a Bayesian technique for the reconstruction and subsequent decimation of 3D surface models from noisy sensor data. The method uses oriented probabilistic models of the measurement noise and combines them with feature-enhancing prior probabilities over 3D surfaces. When applied to surface reconstruction, the method simultaneously smooths noisy regions while enhancing features such as corners. When applied to surface decimation, it finds models that closely approximate the original mesh when rendered. The method is applied in the context of computer animation where it finds decimations that minimize the visual error even under nonrigid deformations.
James Diebel, Sebastian Thrun, Michael Brünig
ACM Trans. Graph.1
2005 An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range Sensing
abstract
This paper describes a highly successful application of MRFs to the problem of generating high-resolution range images. A new generation of range sensors combines the capture of low-resolution range images with the acquisition of registered high-resolution camera images. The MRF in this paper exploits the fact that discontinuities in range and coloring tend to co-align. This enables it to generate high-resolution, low-noise range images by integrating regular camera images into the range data. We show that by using such an MRF, we can substantially improve over existing range imaging technology.
James Diebel, Sebastian Thrun
NIPS1
2004 Simultaneous localization and mapping with active stereo vision
abstract
We present an algorithm for creating globally consistent three-dimensional maps from depth fields produced by camera-based range measurement systems. Our approach is specifically suited to dealing with the high noise levels and the large number of outliers often produced by such systems. Range data is filtered to reject outliers within each scan. The point-to-plane variant of ICP is used for local alignment, including weightings that favor nearby points and a novel outlier rejection strategy that increases the robustness for this class of data while eliminating the burden of user-specified thresholds. Global consistency is imposed on cycles by optimally distributing the cyclic discrepancy according to the local fit correlation matrices. The algorithm is demonstrated on a dataset collected by an active unstructured-light space-time stereo vision system.
James Diebel, Kjeil Reuterswärd, Sebastian Thrun, James Davis 0001, Rakesh Gupta 0001
IROS1