Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James Diebel
dblp:75/5314
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 68% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 32% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d reconstruction
multi-view stereo |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction
bayesian surface reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Bayesian method for probable surface reconstruction and decimation · ACM Trans. Graph. 2006 |
Geometric modeling and processing
surface reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Bayesian method for probable surface reconstruction and decimation · ACM Trans. Graph. 2006 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Algorithms · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth and range sensing |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range Sensing · NIPS 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range Sensing · NIPS 2005 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range Sensing · NIPS 2005 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › range image processing
range image super-resolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range Sensing · NIPS 2005 |
Geometric modeling and processing › mesh processing › mesh simplification
mesh decimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | A Bayesian method for probable surface reconstruction and decimation · ACM Trans. Graph. 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
taxonomy · 0.1quantitative comparison · 0.1probabilistic model · 0.1bayesian inference · 0.1markov random field · 0.1image fusion · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | A Comparison and Evaluation of Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction AlgorithmsabstractThis paper presents a quantitative comparison of several multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. Until now, the lack of suitable calibrated multi-view image datasets with known ground truth (3D shape models) has prevented such direct comparisons. In this paper, we first survey multi-view stereo algorithms and compare them qualitatively using a taxonomy that differentiates their key properties. We then describe our process for acquiring and calibrating multiview image datasets with high-accuracy ground truth and introduce our evaluation methodology. Finally, we present the results of our quantitative comparison of state-of-the-art multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms on six benchmark datasets. The datasets, evaluation details, and instructions for submitting new models are available online at http://vision.middlebury.edu/mview. Steven M. Seitz, Brian Curless, James Diebel, Daniel Scharstein, Richard Szeliski |
CVPR (1) | 3 |
| 2006 | A Bayesian method for probable surface reconstruction and decimationabstractWe present a Bayesian technique for the reconstruction and subsequent decimation of 3D surface models from noisy sensor data. The method uses oriented probabilistic models of the measurement noise and combines them with feature-enhancing prior probabilities over 3D surfaces. When applied to surface reconstruction, the method simultaneously smooths noisy regions while enhancing features such as corners. When applied to surface decimation, it finds models that closely approximate the original mesh when rendered. The method is applied in the context of computer animation where it finds decimations that minimize the visual error even under nonrigid deformations. James Diebel, Sebastian Thrun, Michael Brünig |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 1 |
| 2005 | An Application of Markov Random Fields to Range SensingabstractThis paper describes a highly successful application of MRFs to the problem of generating high-resolution range images. A new generation of range sensors combines the capture of low-resolution range images with the acquisition of registered high-resolution camera images. The MRF in this paper exploits the fact that discontinuities in range and coloring tend to co-align. This enables it to generate high-resolution, low-noise range images by integrating regular camera images into the range data. We show that by using such an MRF, we can substantially improve over existing range imaging technology. James Diebel, Sebastian Thrun |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2004 | Simultaneous localization and mapping with active stereo visionabstractWe present an algorithm for creating globally consistent three-dimensional maps from depth fields produced by camera-based range measurement systems. Our approach is specifically suited to dealing with the high noise levels and the large number of outliers often produced by such systems. Range data is filtered to reject outliers within each scan. The point-to-plane variant of ICP is used for local alignment, including weightings that favor nearby points and a novel outlier rejection strategy that increases the robustness for this class of data while eliminating the burden of user-specified thresholds. Global consistency is imposed on cycles by optimally distributing the cyclic discrepancy according to the local fit correlation matrices. The algorithm is demonstrated on a dataset collected by an active unstructured-light space-time stereo vision system. James Diebel, Kjeil Reuterswärd, Sebastian Thrun, James Davis 0001, Rakesh Gupta 0001 |
IROS | 1 |