Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Saurabh Singh 0005
dblp:75/5436-5
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Vision and language · 34% Deep learning architectures and training · 21% Face, body and person analysis · 20% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › face alignment
landmark localization |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | Learning to Localize Little Landmarks · CVPR 2016 Learning a sequential search for landmarks · CVPR 2015 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › knowledge transfer
inductive transfer |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Aligned Image-Word Representations Improve Inductive Transfer Across Vision-Language Tasks · ICCV 2017 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › cross-modal alignment › visual-semantic alignment
vision-language representation alignment |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Aligned Image-Word Representations Improve Inductive Transfer Across Vision-Language Tasks · ICCV 2017 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Swapout: Learning an ensemble of deep architectures · NIPS 2016 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual grounding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Where to Look: Focus Regions for Visual Question Answering · CVPR 2016 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Where to Look: Focus Regions for Visual Question Answering · CVPR 2016 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
pose estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Learning a sequential search for landmarks · CVPR 2015 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-task transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Aligned Image-Word Representations Improve Inductive Transfer Across Vision-Language Tasks · ICCV 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
image-word embedding · 0.3stochastic depth · 0.2shared embedding space · 0.2sequential prediction model · 0.2inner product relevance · 0.2dropout · 0.2spatial context model · 0.2greedy group expansion · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Aligned Image-Word Representations Improve Inductive Transfer Across Vision-Language Tasks
Tanmay Gupta, Kevin J. Shih, Saurabh Singh 0005, Derek Hoiem |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2016 | Where to Look: Focus Regions for Visual Question AnsweringabstractWe present a method that learns to answer visual questions by selecting image regions relevant to the text-based query. Our method maps textual queries and visual features from various regions into a shared space where they are compared for relevance with an inner product. Our method exhibits significant improvements in answering questions such as "what color," where it is necessary to evaluate a specific location, and "what room," where it selectively identifies informative image regions. Our model is tested on the recently released VQA [1] dataset, which features free-form human-annotated questions and answers. Kevin J. Shih, Saurabh Singh 0005, Derek Hoiem |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2016 | Learning to Localize Little LandmarksabstractWe interact everyday with tiny objects such as the door handle of a car or the light switch in a room. These little landmarks are barely visible and hard to localize in images. We describe a method to find such landmarks by finding a sequence of latent landmarks, each with a prediction model. Each latent landmark predicts the next in sequence, and the last localizes the target landmark. For example, to find the door handle of a car, our method learns to start with a latent landmark near the wheel, as it is globally distinctive, subsequent latent landmarks use the context from the earlier ones to get closer to the target. Our method is supervised solely by the location of the little landmark and displays strong performance on more difficult variants of established tasks and on two new tasks. Saurabh Singh 0005, Derek Hoiem, David A. Forsyth |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2016 | Swapout: Learning an ensemble of deep architecturesabstractWe describe Swapout, a new stochastic training method, that outperforms ResNets of identical network structure yielding impressive results on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100. Swapout samples from a rich set of architectures including dropout, stochastic depth and residual architectures as special cases. When viewed as a regularization method swapout not only inhibits co-adaptation of units in a layer, similar to dropout, but also across network layers. We conjecture that swapout achieves strong regularization by implicitly tying the parameters across layers. When viewed as an ensemble training method, it samples a much richer set of architectures than existing methods such as dropout or stochastic depth. We propose a parameterization that reveals connections to exiting architectures and suggests a much richer set of architectures to be explored. We show that our formulation suggests an efficient training method and validate our conclusions on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 matching state of the art accuracy. Remarkably, our 32 layer wider model performs similar to a 1001 layer ResNet model. Saurabh Singh 0005, Derek Hoiem, David A. Forsyth |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2015 | Part Localization using Multi-Proposal Consensus for Fine-Grained CategorizationabstractWe present a simple deep learning framework to simultaneously predict keypoint locations and their respective visibilities and use those to achieve state-of-the-art performance for fine-grained classification. We show that by conditioning the predictions on object proposals with sufficient image support, our method can do well without complicated spatial reasoning. Instead, inference methods with robustness to outliers, yield state-of-the-art for keypoint localization. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our accurate keypoint localization and visibility prediction on the fine-grained bird recognition task with and without ground truth bird bounding boxes, and outperform existing state-of-the-art methods by over 2%. Kevin J. Shih, Arun Mallya, Saurabh Singh 0005, Derek Hoiem |
BMVC | 3 |
| 2015 | Learning a sequential search for landmarksabstractWe propose a general method to find landmarks in images of objects using both appearance and spatial context. This method is applied without changes to two problems: parsing human body layouts, and finding landmarks in images of birds. Our method learns a sequential search for localizing landmarks, iteratively detecting new landmarks given the appearance and contextual information from the already detected ones. The choice of landmark to be added is opportunistic and depends on the image; for example, in one image a head-shoulder group might be expanded to a head-shoulder-hip group but in a different image to a head-shoulder-elbow group. The choice of initial landmark is similarly image dependent. Groups are scored using a learned function, which is used to expand them greedily. Our scoring function is learned from data labelled with landmarks but without any labeling of a detection order. Our method represents a novel spatial model for the kinematics of groups of landmarks, and displays strong performance on two different model problems. Saurabh Singh 0005, Derek Hoiem, David A. Forsyth |
CVPR | 1 |