Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anthony J. Bell
dblp:75/5494
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
6as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 5 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 82% Segmentation and scene understanding · 9% Graph learning · 9% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 80% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 20% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Audio and music processing · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › blind source separation
independent component analysis |
0.1 | 4 | 2004 | Maximising Sensitivity in a Spiking Network · NIPS 2004 Edges are the Independent Components of Natural Scenes · NIPS 1996 A Non-linear Information Maximisation Algorithm that Performs Blind Separation · NIPS 1994 |
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing |
0.1 | 2 | 2004 | Maximising Sensitivity in a Spiking Network · NIPS 2004 Self-organization in Real Neurons: Anti-Hebb in 'Channel Space'? · NIPS 1991 |
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing
spiking neural network training |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Maximising Sensitivity in a Spiking Network · NIPS 2004 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
brain imaging |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Imaging brain dynamics using independent component analysis · Proc. IEEE 2001 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging
EEG/MEG analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Imaging brain dynamics using independent component analysis · Proc. IEEE 2001 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging › neuroimaging analysis
fMRI analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Imaging brain dynamics using independent component analysis · Proc. IEEE 2001 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
blind source separation |
0.0 | 2 | 1996 | Blind Separation of Delayed and Convolved Sources · NIPS 1996 A Non-linear Information Maximisation Algorithm that Performs Blind Separation · NIPS 1994 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
edge detection |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Edges are the Independent Components of Natural Scenes · NIPS 1996 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph representation learning
edge embedding |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Edges are the Independent Components of Natural Scenes · NIPS 1996 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
natural image statistics |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Edges are the Independent Components of Natural Scenes · NIPS 1996 |
Audio and music processing › source separation
blind source separation |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Blind Separation of Delayed and Convolved Sources · NIPS 1996 |
Medical and health informatics
EEG analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data · NIPS 1995 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
independent component analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data · NIPS 1995 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural signal analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 1995 | Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data · NIPS 1995 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › mutual information maximization
information maximization |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | A Non-linear Information Maximisation Algorithm that Performs Blind Separation · NIPS 1994 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
hebbian learning |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Self-organization in Real Neurons: Anti-Hebb in 'Channel Space'? · NIPS 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
independent component analysis · 0.1spike-timing-dependent plasticity · 0.1information maximization · 0.1stochastic gradient ascent · 0.0mutual information · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | On the Maximization of Information Flow Between Spiking NeuronsabstractA feedforward spiking network represents a nonlinear transformation that maps a set of input spikes to a set of output spikes. This mapping transforms the joint probability distribution of incoming spikes into a joint distribution of output spikes. We present an algorithm for synaptic adaptation that aims to maximize the entropy of this output distribution, thereby creating a model for the joint distribution of the incoming point processes. The learning rule that is derived depends on the precise pre- and postsynaptic spike timings. When trained on correlated spike trains, the network learns to extract independent spike trains, thereby uncovering the underlying statistical structure and creating a more efficient representation of the incoming spike trains. Lucas C. Parra, Jeffrey M. Beck, Anthony J. Bell |
Neural Comput. | 3 |
| 2004 | Maximising Sensitivity in a Spiking NetworkabstractWe use unsupervised probabilistic machine learning ideas to try to ex- plain the kinds of learning observed in real neurons, the goal being to connect abstract principles of self-organisation to known biophysi- cal processes. For example, we would like to explain Spike Timing- Dependent Plasticity (see [5,6] and Figure 3A), in terms of information theory. Starting out, we explore the optimisation of a network sensitiv- ity measure related to maximising the mutual information between input spike timings and output spike timings. Our derivations are analogous to those in ICA, except that the sensitivity of output timings to input tim- ings is maximised, rather than the sensitivity of output ‘firing rates’ to inputs. ICA and related approaches have been successful in explaining the learning of many properties of early visual receptive fields in rate cod- ing models, and we are hoping for similar gains in understanding of spike coding in networks, and how this is supported, in principled probabilistic ways, by cellular biophysical processes. For now, in our initial simula- tions, we show that our derived rule can learn synaptic weights which can unmix, or demultiplex, mixed spike trains. That is, it can recover inde- pendent point processes embedded in distributed correlated input spike trains, using an adaptive single-layer feedforward spiking network. 1 Maximising Sensitivity. In this section, we will follow the structure of the ICA derivation [4] in developing the spiking theory. We cannot claim, as before, that this gives us an information maximisation algorithm, for reasons that we will delay addressing until Section 3. But for now, to first develop our approach, we will explore an interim objective function called sensitivity which we define as the log Jacobian of how input spike timings affect output spike timings. 1.1 How to maximise the effect of one spike timing on another. Consider a spike in neuron j at time tl that has an effect on the timing of another spike in neuron i at time tk. The neurons are connected by a weight wij. We use i and j to index neurons, and k and l to index spikes, but sometimes for convenience we will use spike indices in place of neuron indices. For example, wkl, the weight between an input spike l and an output spike k, is naturally understood to be just the corresponding wij. Anthony J. Bell, Lucas C. Parra |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2001 | Imaging brain dynamics using independent component analysisabstractThe analysis of electroencephalographic (EEG) and magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings is important both for basic brain research and for medical diagnosis and treatment. Independent component analysis (ICA) is an effective method for removing artifacts and separating sources of the brain signals from these recordings. A similar approach is proving useful for analyzing functional magnetic resonance brain imaging (fMRI) data. In this paper, we outline the assumptions underlying ICA and demonstrate its application to a variety of electrical and hemodynamic recordings from the human brain. Tzyy-Ping Jung, Scott Makeig, Martin J. McKeown, Anthony J. Bell, Te-Won Lee, Terrence J. Sejnowski |
Proc. IEEE | 4 |
| 1997 | Blind separation of multiple speakers in a multipath environmentabstractWe relate information theoretic blind learning methods (infomax) and Bussgang blind equalization methods. The multipath extension of blind source separation methods can be seen in the frequency domain using FIR matrix algebra (matrices of finite impulse response filters). Three forms of Bussgang algorithms are given. The blind serial update method of Cardoso and Laheld (1994) is related to the infomax objective of Bell and Sejnowski (1995). The application emphasis is on speech separation. We demonstrate the robustness and power of the new techniques by blindly separating speech signals recorded in a multipath environment. Russell H. Lambert, Anthony J. Bell |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 1996 | Edges are the Independent Components of Natural Scenes
Anthony J. Bell, Terrence J. Sejnowski |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1996 | Blind Separation of Delayed and Convolved Sources
Te-Won Lee, Anthony J. Bell, Russell H. Lambert |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1995 | Blind separation and blind deconvolution: an information-theoretic approachabstractBlind separation and blind deconvolution are related problems in unsupervised learning. In this contribution, static non-linearities are used in combination with an information-theoretic objective function, making the approach more rigorous than previous ones. We derive a new algorithm and with it perform nearly perfect separation of up to 10 digitally mixed human speakers, better performance than any previous algorithms for blind separation. When used for deconvolution, the technique automatically cancels echoes and reverberations and reverses the effects of low-pass filtering. Anthony J. Bell, Terrence J. Sejnowski |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 1995 | Independent Component Analysis of Electroencephalographic Data
Scott Makeig, Anthony J. Bell, Tzyy-Ping Jung, Terrence J. Sejnowski |
NIPS | 2 |
| 1995 | An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolutionabstractWe derive a new self-organizing learning algorithm that maximizes the information transferred in a network of nonlinear units. The algorithm does not assume any knowledge of the input distributions, and is defined here for the zero-noise limit. Under these conditions, information maximization has extra properties not found in the linear case (Linsker 1989). The nonlinearities in the transfer function are able to pick up higher-order moments of the input distributions and perform something akin to true redundancy reduction between units in the output representation. This enables the network to separate statistically independent components in the inputs: a higher-order generalization of principal components analysis. We apply the network to the source separation (or cocktail party) problem, successfully separating unknown mixtures of up to 10 speakers. We also show that a variant on the network architecture is able to perform blind deconvolution (cancellation of unknown echoes and reverberation in a speech signal). Finally, we derive dependencies of information transfer on time delays. We suggest that information maximization provides a unifying framework for problems in "blind" signal processing. Anthony J. Bell, Terrence J. Sejnowski |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 1994 | A Non-linear Information Maximisation Algorithm that Performs Blind SeparationabstractA new learning algorithm is derived which performs online stochas(cid:173) tic gradient ascent in the mutual information between outputs and inputs of a network. In the absence of a priori knowledge about the 'signal' and 'noise' components of the input, propagation of information depends on calibrating network non-linearities to the detailed higher-order moments of the input density functions. By incidentally minimising mutual information between outputs, as well as maximising their individual entropies, the network 'fac(cid:173) torises' the input into independent components. As an example application, we have achieved near-perfect separation of ten digi(cid:173) tally mixed speech signals. Our simulations lead us to believe that our network performs better at blind separation than the Herault(cid:173) J utten network, reflecting the fact that it is derived rigorously from the mutual information objective. 468 Anthony J. Bell, Terrence J. Sejnowski Anthony J. Bell, Terrence J. Sejnowski |
NIPS | 1 |
| 1991 | Self-organization in Real Neurons: Anti-Hebb in 'Channel Space'?
Anthony J. Bell |
NIPS | 1 |