Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
A. O. L. Atkin
dblp:75/6417
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › computational number theory
primality testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1982 | On a Primality Test of Solovay and Strassen · SIAM J. Comput. 1982 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
error probability analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1982 | On a Primality Test of Solovay and StrassenabstractSolovay and Strassen [SIAM J. Comput., 6 (1977), pp. 84–85] propose a primality test based on the fact that for primes $p > 2$ we have $(a/ p) \equiv a^{(p - 1)/2} (\bmod p)$, where $(a / p)$ is the Jacobi symbol. We prove here that the strong pseudoprime test is better, in the sense that it never takes more time nor is less effective, and sometimes is quicker or more effective. We also discuss the probability of error in the strong pseudoprime test, and show that it is never greater than $\tfrac{1}{4}$. A. O. L. Atkin, Richard G. Larson |
SIAM J. Comput. | 1 |