Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

A. O. L. Atkin

dblp:75/6417 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › computational number theory
primality testing
0.011982
On a Primality Test of Solovay and Strassen · SIAM J. Comput. 1982

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

error probability analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 On a Primality Test of Solovay and Strassen
abstract
Solovay and Strassen [SIAM J. Comput., 6 (1977), pp. 84–85] propose a primality test based on the fact that for primes $p > 2$ we have $(a/ p) \equiv a^{(p - 1)/2} (\bmod p)$, where $(a / p)$ is the Jacobi symbol. We prove here that the strong pseudoprime test is better, in the sense that it never takes more time nor is less effective, and sometimes is quicker or more effective. We also discuss the probability of error in the strong pseudoprime test, and show that it is never greater than $\tfrac{1}{4}$.
A. O. L. Atkin, Richard G. Larson
SIAM J. Comput.1