Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yan Huang 0014

dblp:75/6434-14 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-6879-0446ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 56% Deep learning architectures and training · 44%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
long document classification
0.512021
Knowledge-aware Leap-LSTM: Integrating Prior Knowledge into Leap-LSTM towards Faster Long Text Classification · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
LSTM
0.512021
Knowledge-aware Leap-LSTM: Integrating Prior Knowledge into Leap-LSTM towards Faster Long Text Classification · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.512021
Knowledge-aware Leap-LSTM: Integrating Prior Knowledge into Leap-LSTM towards Faster Long Text Classification · AAAI 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.512021
Knowledge-aware Leap-LSTM: Integrating Prior Knowledge into Leap-LSTM towards Faster Long Text Classification · AAAI 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation › corpus annotation
syntactic annotation
0.212016
Anchoring and Agreement in Syntactic Annotations · EMNLP 2016
Empirical software engineering › data annotation
annotation agreement
0.212016
Anchoring and Agreement in Syntactic Annotations · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

skip mechanism · 0.5knowledge integration · 0.5cost function · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Knowledge-aware Leap-LSTM: Integrating Prior Knowledge into Leap-LSTM towards Faster Long Text Classification
abstract
While widely used in industry, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) are known to have deficiencies in dealing with long sequences (e.g. slow inference, vanishing gradients etc.). Recent research has attempted to accelerate RNN models by developing mechanisms to skip irrelevant words in input. Due to the lack of labelled data, it remains as a challenge to decide which words to skip, especially for low-resource classification tasks. In this paper, we propose Knowledge-AwareLeap-LSTM (KALL), a novel architecture which integrates prior human knowledge (created either manually or automatically) like in-domain keywords, terminologies or lexicons into Leap-LSTM to partially supervise the skipping process. More specifically, we propose a knowledge-oriented cost function for KALL; furthermore, we propose two strategies to integrate the knowledge: (1) the Factored KALL approach involves a keyword indicator as a soft constraint for the skip-ping process, and (2) the Gated KALL enforces the inclusion of keywords while maintaining a differentiable network in training. Experiments on different public datasets show that our approaches are1.1x~2.6x faster than LSTM with better accuracy and 23.6x faster than XLNet in a resource-limited CPU-only environment.
Jinhua Du, Yan Huang 0014, Karo Moilanen
AAAI2
2020 Pointing to Select: A Fast Pointer-LSTM for Long Text Classification
abstract
Recurrent neural networks (RNNs) suffer from well-known limitations and complications which include slow inference and vanishing gradients when processing long sequences in text classification.Recent studies have attempted to accelerate RNNs via various ad hoc mechanisms to skip irrelevant words in the input.However, word skipping approaches proposed to date effectively stop at each or a given time step to decide whether or not a given input word should be skipped, breaking the coherence of input processing in RNNs.Furthermore, current methods cannot change skip rates during inference and are consequently unable to support different skip rates in demanding real-world conditions.To overcome these limitations, we propose Pointer-LSTM, a novel LSTM framework which relies on a pointer network to select important words for target prediction.The model maintains a coherent input process for the LSTM modules and makes it possible to change the skip rate during inference.Our evaluation on four public data sets demonstrates that Pointer-LSTM (a) is 1.1x∼3.5xfaster than the standard LSTM architecture; (b) is more accurate than Leap-LSTM (the state-of-the-art LSTM skipping model) at high skip rates; and (c) reaches robust accuracy levels even when the skip rate is changed during inference.
Jinhua Du, Yan Huang 0014, Karo Moilanen
COLING2
2016 Anchoring and Agreement in Syntactic Annotations
abstract
We present a study on two key characteristics of human syntactic annotations: anchoring and agreement. Anchoring is a well known cognitive bias in human decision making, where judgments are drawn towards pre-existing values. We study the influence of anchoring on a standard approach to creation of syntactic resources where syntactic annotations are obtained via human editing of tagger and parser output. Our experiments demonstrate a clear anchoring effect and reveal unwanted consequences, including overestimation of parsing performance and lower quality of annotations in comparison with human-based annotations. Using sentences from the Penn Treebank WSJ, we also report systematically obtained inter-annotator agreement estimates for English dependency parsing. Our agreement results control for parser bias, and are consequential in that they are on par with state of the art parsing performance for English newswire. We discuss the impact of our findings on strategies for future annotation efforts and parser evaluations.
Yevgeni Berzak, Yan Huang 0014, Andrei Barbu, Anna Korhonen, Boris Katz
EMNLP2
2016 Automatic generation of short answer questions for reading comprehension assessment
abstract
Abstract Writing items for reading comprehension assessment is time-consuming. Automating part of the process can help test-designers to develop assessments more efficiently and consistently. This paper presents an approach to automatically generating short answer questions for reading comprehension assessment. Our major contribution is to introduce Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) as the linguistic framework for question generation, which enables systematic utilization of semantic and syntactic information. The approach can efficiently generate questions of better quality than previous high-performing question generation systems, and uses paraphrasing and sentence selection to improve the cognitive complexity and effectiveness of questions.
Yan Huang 0014, Lianzhen He
Nat. Lang. Eng.1