Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Hartmut Witte

dblp:75/651 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
0000-0001-6055-2921ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 91% Robot manipulation · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
legged robots
0.212015
Comparing the effect of different spine and leg designs for a small bounding quadruped robot · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
quadruped bounding
0.212015
Comparing the effect of different spine and leg designs for a small bounding quadruped robot · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
quadruped robot
0.212015
Comparing the effect of different spine and leg designs for a small bounding quadruped robot · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot design
modular robot design
0.112015
Comparing the effect of different spine and leg designs for a small bounding quadruped robot · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Comparing the effect of different spine and leg designs for a small bounding quadruped robot
abstract
We present Lynx-robot, a quadruped, modular, compliant machine. It alternately features a directly actuated, single-joint spine design, or an actively supported, passive compliant, multi-joint spine configuration. Both spine configurations bend in the sagittal plane. This study aims at characterizing these two, largely different spine concepts, for a bounding gait of a robot with a three segmented, pantograph leg design. An earlier, similar-sized, bounding, quadruped robot named Bobcat with a two-segment leg design and a directly actuated, single-joint spine design serves as a comparison robot, to study and compare the effect of the leg design on speed, while keeping the spine design fixed. Both proposed spine designs (single rotatory and active and multi-joint compliant) reach moderate, self-stable speeds.
Peter Eckert, Alexander Badri-Spröwitz, Hartmut Witte, Auke Jan Ijspeert
ICRA3