Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William W. L. Hsiao

dblp:75/7111 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 5 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
bioinformatics infrastructure
0.212016
Sequence database versioning for command line and Galaxy bioinformatics servers · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing read preprocessing
chimera detection
0.212013
EBARDenovo: highly accurate de novo assembly of RNA-Seq with efficient chimera-detection · Bioinform. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly › genome assembly
de novo assembly
0.212013
EBARDenovo: highly accurate de novo assembly of RNA-Seq with efficient chimera-detection · Bioinform. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
RNA-seq analysis
0.212013
EBARDenovo: highly accurate de novo assembly of RNA-Seq with efficient chimera-detection · Bioinform. 2013
Bioinformatics and computational biology
comparative genomics
0.112012
MicrobeDB: a locally maintainable database of microbial genomic sequences · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genome annotation
0.112012
MicrobeDB: a locally maintainable database of microbial genomic sequences · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
microbial genomics
0.112012
MicrobeDB: a locally maintainable database of microbial genomic sequences · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › comparative genomics
genomic island detection
0.012003
IslandPath: aiding detection of genomic islands in prokaryotes · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.012003
IslandPath: aiding detection of genomic islands in prokaryotes · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metagenomics
horizontal gene transfer detection
0.012003
IslandPath: aiding detection of genomic islands in prokaryotes · Bioinform. 2003
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › microbial genomics
prokaryotic genome analysis
0.012003
IslandPath: aiding detection of genomic islands in prokaryotes · Bioinform. 2003

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

extension-bridging-repeat-sensing · 0.2de bruijn graph assembly · 0.2database management · 0.1sequence feature integration · 0.0graphical genome display · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Sequence database versioning for command line and Galaxy bioinformatics servers
abstract
MOTIVATION: There are various reasons for rerunning bioinformatics tools and pipelines on sequencing data, including reproducing a past result, validation of a new tool or workflow using a known dataset, or tracking the impact of database changes. For identical results to be achieved, regularly updated reference sequence databases must be versioned and archived. Database administrators have tried to fill the requirements by supplying users with one-off versions of databases, but these are time consuming to set up and are inconsistent across resources. Disk storage and data backup performance has also discouraged maintaining multiple versions of databases since databases such as NCBI nr can consume 50 Gb or more disk space per version, with growth rates that parallel Moore's law. RESULTS: Our end-to-end solution combines our own Kipper software package-a simple key-value large file versioning system-with BioMAJ (software for downloading sequence databases), and Galaxy (a web-based bioinformatics data processing platform). Available versions of databases can be recalled and used by command-line and Galaxy users. The Kipper data store format makes publishing curated FASTA databases convenient since in most cases it can store a range of versions into a file marginally larger than the size of the latest version. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Kipper v1.0.0 and the Galaxy Versioned Data tool are written in Python and released as free and open source software available at https://github.com/Public-Health-Bioinformatics/kipper and https://github.com/Public-Health-Bioinformatics/versioned_data, respectively; detailed setup instructions can be found at https://github.com/Public-Health-Bioinformatics/versioned_data/blob/master/doc/setup.md CONTACT: : [email protected] or [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Damion M. Dooley, Aaron J. Petkau, Gary H. Van Domselaar, William W. L. Hsiao
Bioinform.4
2013 EBARDenovo: highly accurate de novo assembly of RNA-Seq with efficient chimera-detection
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-accuracy de novo assembly of the short sequencing reads from RNA-Seq technology is very challenging. We introduce a de novo assembly algorithm, EBARDenovo, which stands for Extension, Bridging And Repeat-sensing Denovo. This algorithm uses an efficient chimera-detection function to abrogate the effect of aberrant chimeric reads in RNA-Seq data. RESULTS: EBARDenovo resolves the complications of RNA-Seq assembly arising from sequencing errors, repetitive sequences and aberrant chimeric amplicons. In a series of assembly experiments, our algorithm is the most accurate among the examined programs, including de Bruijn graph assemblers, Trinity and Oases. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: EBARDenovo is available at http://ebardenovo.sourceforge.net/. This software package (with patent pending) is free of charge for academic use only. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Hsueh-Ting Chu, William W. L. Hsiao, Jen-Chih Chen, Tze-Jung Yeh, Mong-Hsun Tsai, Yen-Wenn Liu, Sheng-An Lee, Chaur-Chin Chen, Theresa Tsao, Cheng-Yan Kao
Bioinform.2
2012 MicrobeDB: a locally maintainable database of microbial genomic sequences
abstract
UNLABELLED: Analysis of microbial genomes often requires the general organization and comparison of tens to thousands of genomes both from public repositories and unpublished sources. MicrobeDB provides a foundation for such projects by the automation of downloading published, completed bacterial and archaeal genomes from key sources, parsing annotations of all genomes (both public and private) into a local database, and allowing interaction with the database through an easy to use programming interface. MicrobeDB creates a simple to use, easy to maintain, centralized local resource for various large-scale comparative genomic analyses and a back-end for future microbial application design. AVAILABILITY: MicrobeDB is freely available under the GNU-GPL at: http://github.com/mlangill/microbedb/
Morgan G. I. Langille, Matthew R. Laird, William W. L. Hsiao, Terry A. Chiu, Jonathan A. Eisen, Fiona S. L. Brinkman
Bioinform.3
2008 Evaluation of genomic island predictors using a comparative genomics approach
abstract
BACKGROUND: Genomic islands (GIs) are clusters of genes in prokaryotic genomes of probable horizontal origin. GIs are disproportionately associated with microbial adaptations of medical or environmental interest. Recently, multiple programs for automated detection of GIs have been developed that utilize sequence composition characteristics, such as G+C ratio and dinucleotide bias. To robustly evaluate the accuracy of such methods, we propose that a dataset of GIs be constructed using criteria that are independent of sequence composition-based analysis approaches. RESULTS: We developed a comparative genomics approach (IslandPick) that identifies both very probable islands and non-island regions. The approach involves 1) flexible, automated selection of comparative genomes for each query genome, using a distance function that picks appropriate genomes for identification of GIs, 2) identification of regions unique to the query genome, compared with the chosen genomes (positive dataset) and 3) identification of regions conserved across all genomes (negative dataset). Using our constructed datasets, we investigated the accuracy of several sequence composition-based GI prediction tools. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that AlienHunter has the highest recall, but the lowest measured precision, while SIGI-HMM is the most precise method. SIGI-HMM and IslandPath/DIMOB have comparable overall highest accuracy. Our comparative genomics approach, IslandPick, was the most accurate, compared with a curated list of GIs, indicating that we have constructed suitable datasets. This represents the first evaluation, using diverse and, independent datasets that were not artificially constructed, of the accuracy of several sequence composition-based GI predictors. The caveats associated with this analysis and proposals for optimal island prediction are discussed.
Morgan G. I. Langille, William W. L. Hsiao, Fiona S. L. Brinkman
BMC Bioinform.2
2003 IslandPath: aiding detection of genomic islands in prokaryotes
abstract
UNLABELLED: Genomic islands (clusters of genes of potential horizontal origin in a prokaryotic genome) are frequently associated with a particular adaptation of a microbe that is of medical, agricultural or environmental importance, such as antibiotic resistance, pathogen virulence, or metal resistance. While many sequence features associated with such islands have been adopted separately in applications for analysis of genomic islands, including pathogenicity islands, there is no single application that integrates multiple features for island detection. IslandPath is a network service which incorporates multiple DNA signals and genome annotation features into a graphical display of a bacterial or archaeal genome, to aid the detection of genomic islands. AVAILABILITY: This application is available at http://www.pathogenomics.sfu.ca/islandpath and the source code is freely available, under GNU public licence, from the authors. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An online help file, which includes analyses of the utility of IslandPath, can be found at http://www.pathogenomics.sfu.ca/islandpath/current/islandhelp.html
William W. L. Hsiao, Ivan Wan, Steven J. M. Jones, Fiona S. L. Brinkman
Bioinform.1