EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Julia Peltason
dblp:75/7735
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers |
Human-robot interaction · 66% Human-AI interaction · 34% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 77% Motion planning and robot control · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
mixed-initiative interaction |
0.2 | 2 | 2009 | Mixed-initiative in human augmented mapping · ICRA 2009 The curious robot - Structuring interactive robot learning · ICRA 2009 |
Human-robot interaction › robot learning
object learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Talking with robots about objects: a system-level evaluation in HRI · HRI 2012 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
SLAM |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Mixed-initiative in human augmented mapping · ICRA 2009 |
Human-robot interaction › robot learning
interactive robot learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | The curious robot - Structuring interactive robot learning · ICRA 2009 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning
object learning |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | The curious robot - Structuring interactive robot learning · ICRA 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
video study · 0.2interactive learning · 0.2event-based interaction architecture · 0.2environment representation · 0.2PARADISE method · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Talking with robots about objects: a system-level evaluation in HRIabstractWe present the design process, realization and evaluation of a robot system for nteractive object learning. The system-oriented evaluation, in particular, addresses an open problem for the evaluation of systems, where overall user satisfaction depends not only on the performance of the parts, but also on their combination, and on user behavior. Based on the PARADISE method known from spoken dialog systems, we have defined and applied internal and external metrics for fine-grained and largely automatable identification of such relationships. Through evaluation with n=28 subjects, indicator functions explaining up to 55% of variation in several satisfaction metrics were found. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the system's interaction style reduces the need for instruction and successfully recovers partial failures. Julia Peltason, Nina Riether, Britta Wrede, Ingo Lütkebohle |
HRI | 1 |
| 2011 | Engagement-based Multi-party Dialog with a Humanoid Robot
David Klotz, Johannes Wienke, Julia Peltason, Britta Wrede, Sebastian Wrede 0001, Vasil Khalidov, Jean-Marc Odobez |
SIGDIAL Conference | 3 |
| 2010 | Pamini: A framework for assembling mixed-initiative human-robot interaction from generic interaction patterns
Julia Peltason, Britta Wrede |
SIGDIAL Conference | 1 |
| 2009 | The curious robot - Structuring interactive robot learningabstractIf robots are to succeed in novel tasks, they must be able to learn from humans. To improve such human-robot interaction, a system is presented that provides dialog structure and engages the human in an exploratory teaching scenario. Thereby, we specifically target untrained users, who are supported by mixed-initiative interaction using verbal and non-verbal modalities. We present the principles of dialog structuring based on an object learning and manipulation scenario. System development is following an interactive evaluation approach and we will present both an extensible, event-based interaction architecture to realize mixed-initiative and evaluation results based on a video-study of the system. We show that users benefit from the provided dialog structure to result in predictable and successful human-robot interaction. Ingo Lütkebohle, Julia Peltason, Lars Schillingmann, Britta Wrede, Sven Wachsmuth, Christof Elbrechter, Robert Haschke |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2009 | Mixed-initiative in human augmented mappingabstractIn scenarios that require a close collaboration and knowledge transfer between inexperienced users and robots, the ldquolearning by interactingrdquo paradigm goes hand in hand with appropriate representations and learning methods. In this paper we discuss a mixed initiative strategy for robotic learning by interacting with a user in a joint map acquisition process. We propose the integration of an environment representation approach into our interactive learning framework. The environment representation and mapping system supports both user driven and data driven strategies for the acquisition of spatial information, so that a mixed initiative strategy for the learning process is realised. We evaluate our system with test runs according to the scenario of a guided tour, extending the area of operation from structured laboratory environment to less predictable domestic settings. Julia Peltason, Frederic H. K. Siepmann, Thorsten Spexard, Britta Wrede, Marc Hanheide, Elin Anna Topp |
ICRA | 1 |