EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Judith Rousseau
dblp:75/8020
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-0998-6174ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 68% Deep learning architectures and training · 15% Graph learning · 7% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian asymptotics
posterior contraction rates |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Nonparametric Regression on Random Geometric Graphs Sampled from Submanifolds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 Posterior Contraction Rates for Matérn Gaussian Processes on Riemannian Manifolds · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
bayesian nonparametric regression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Nonparametric Regression on Random Geometric Graphs Sampled from Submanifolds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process › temporal point process
hawkes process |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable and Adaptive Variational Bayes Methods for Hawkes Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
point process |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable and Adaptive Variational Bayes Methods for Hawkes Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable and Adaptive Variational Bayes Methods for Hawkes Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Posterior Contraction Rates for Matérn Gaussian Processes on Riemannian Manifolds · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process on riemannian manifold |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Posterior Contraction Rates for Matérn Gaussian Processes on Riemannian Manifolds · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
approximate bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Fast Bayesian Coresets via Subsampling and Quasi-Newton Refinement · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference
bayesian coresets |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Fast Bayesian Coresets via Subsampling and Quasi-Newton Refinement · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Fast Bayesian Coresets via Subsampling and Quasi-Newton Refinement · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization
quasi-newton method |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Fast Bayesian Coresets via Subsampling and Quasi-Newton Refinement · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
activation function |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Impact of the Activation function on Deep Neural Networks Training · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
edge of chaos |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Impact of the Activation function on Deep Neural Networks Training · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
neural network theory |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Impact of the Activation function on Deep Neural Networks Training · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
trainability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Impact of the Activation function on Deep Neural Networks Training · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
vanishing and exploding gradients |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Impact of the Activation function on Deep Neural Networks Training · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
weight initialization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Impact of the Activation function on Deep Neural Networks Training · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › structure learning
graphical model selection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable and Adaptive Variational Bayes Methods for Hawkes Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable and Adaptive Variational Bayes Methods for Hawkes Processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › statistical estimation
minimax optimality |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Nonparametric Regression on Random Geometric Graphs Sampled from Submanifolds · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random basis expansion · 1.7graph laplacian · 1.7bayesian prior · 1.7parallel algorithm · 0.9mean-field variational approximation · 0.9MCMC · 0.9trace and extension theorems · 0.7sobolev space embedding · 0.7quasi-newton method · 0.6kullback-leibler divergence · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Nonparametric Regression on Random Geometric Graphs Sampled from SubmanifoldsabstractWe consider the nonparametric regression problem when the covariates are located on an unknown compact submanifold of a Euclidean space. Under defining a random geometric graph structure over the covariates we analyse the asymptotic frequentist behaviour of the posterior distribution arising from Bayesian priors designed through random basis expansion in the graph Laplacian eigenbasis. Under Hölder smoothness assumption on the regression function and the density of the covariates over the submanifold, we prove that the posterior contraction rates of such methods are minimax optimal (up to logarithmic factors) for any positive smoothness index. Paul Rosa, Judith Rousseau |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2025 | Scalable and Adaptive Variational Bayes Methods for Hawkes ProcessesabstractHawkes processes are often applied to model dependence and interaction phenomena in multivariate event data sets, such as neuronal spike trains, social interactions, and financial transactions. In the nonparametric setting, learning the temporal dependence structure of Hawkes processes is generally a computationally expensive task, all the more with Bayesian estimation methods. In particular, for multivariate nonlinear Hawkes processes, Monte-Carlo Markov Chain (MCMC) methods used to sample from the posterior distribution do not scale well to the dimension of the process. Recently, efficient algorithms targeting a mean-field variational approximation of the posterior distribution have been proposed, however, these methods do not allow to perform model selection on the graph of interactions of the Hawkes model. In this work, we propose a novel adaptive Bayesian variational method that performs model selection and can estimate a sparse graphical parameter. For the popular sigmoid Hawkes processes, we design a parallel algorithm which is scalable to high-dimensional point processes and large sequences of events. Furthermore, we unify existing variational Bayes approaches under a general nonparametric inference framework, and analyse the asymptotic properties of these methods under easily verifiable conditions on the prior, the variational class, and the nonlinear model. Finally, through an extensive set of numerical simulations, we demonstrate that our method is able to adapt to the dimensionality of the parameter of the Hawkes process, and is partially robust to certain types of model misspecification. Déborah Sulem, Vincent Rivoirard, Judith Rousseau |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2023 | Posterior Contraction Rates for Matérn Gaussian Processes on Riemannian ManifoldsabstractGaussian processes are used in many machine learning applications that rely on uncertainty quantification. Recently, computational tools for working with these models in geometric settings, such as when inputs lie on a Riemannian manifold, have been developed. This raises the question: can these intrinsic models be shown theoretically to lead to better performance, compared to simply embedding all relevant quantities into $\mathbb{R}^d$ and using the restriction of an ordinary Euclidean Gaussian process? To study this, we prove optimal contraction rates for intrinsic Matérn Gaussian processes defined on compact Riemannian manifolds. We also prove analogous rates for extrinsic processes using trace and extension theorems between manifold and ambient Sobolev spaces: somewhat surprisingly, the rates obtained turn out to coincide with those of the intrinsic processes, provided that their smoothness parameters are matched appropriately. We illustrate these rates empirically on a number of examples, which, mirroring prior work, show that intrinsic processes can achieve better performance in practice. Therefore, our work shows that finer-grained analyses are needed to distinguish between different levels of data-efficiency of geometric Gaussian processes, particularly in settings which involve small data set sizes and non-asymptotic behavior. Paul Rosa, Viacheslav Borovitskiy, Alexander Terenin, Judith Rousseau |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2022 | Fast Bayesian Coresets via Subsampling and Quasi-Newton RefinementabstractBayesian coresets approximate a posterior distribution by building a small weighted subset of the data points. Any inference procedure that is too computationally expensive to be run on the full posterior can instead be run inexpensively on the coreset, with results that approximate those on the full data. However, current approaches are limited by either a significant run-time or the need for the user to specify a low-cost approximation to the full posterior. We propose a Bayesian coreset construction algorithm that first selects a uniformly random subset of data, and then optimizes the weights using a novel quasi-Newton method. Our algorithm is a simple to implement, black-box method, that does not require the user to specify a low-cost posterior approximation. It is the first to come with a general high-probability bound on the KL divergence of the output coreset posterior. Experiments demonstrate that our method provides significant improvements in coreset quality against alternatives with comparable construction times, with far less storage cost and user input required. Cian Naik, Judith Rousseau, Trevor Campbell |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Bayesian Nonparametrics for Sparse Dynamic Networks
Cian Naik, François Caron, Judith Rousseau, Yee Whye Teh, Konstantina Palla |
ECML/PKDD (5) | 3 |
| 2021 | Stable ResNetabstractDeep ResNet architectures have achieved state of the art performance on many tasks. While they solve the problem of gradient vanishing, they might suffer from gradient exploding as the depth becomes large (Yang et al. 2017). Moreover, recent results have shown that ResNet might lose expressivity as the depth goes to infinity (Yang et al. 2017, Hayou et al. 2019). To resolve these issues, we introduce a new class of ResNet architectures, calledStable ResNet, that have the property of stabilizing the gradient while ensuring expressivity in the infinite depth limit. Soufiane Hayou, Eugenio Clerico, Bobby He, George Deligiannidis, Arnaud Doucet, Judith Rousseau |
AISTATS | 6 |
| 2019 | On the Impact of the Activation function on Deep Neural Networks TrainingabstractThe weight initialization and the activation function of deep neural networks have a crucial impact on the performance of the training procedure. An inappropriate selection can lead to the loss of information of the input during forward propagation and the exponential vanishing/exploding of gradients during back-propagation. Understanding the theoretical properties of untrained random networks is key to identifying which deep networks may be trained successfully as recently demonstrated by Samuel et al. (2017) who showed that for deep feedforward neural networks only a specific choice of hyperparameters known as the ‘Edge of Chaos’ can lead to good performance. While the work by Samuel et al. (2017) discuss trainability issues, we focus here on training acceleration and overall performance. We give a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the Edge of Chaos and show that we can indeed tune the initialization parameters and the activation function in order to accelerate the training and improve the performance. Soufiane Hayou, Arnaud Doucet, Judith Rousseau |
ICML | 3 |