Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kristiyan Haralambiev
dblp:75/8178
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 11Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
9 papers |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 65% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 24% Authentication and access control · 8% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Storage systems · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
commitment schemes |
0.5 | 3 | 2016 | Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · J. Cryptol. 2016 Group to Group Commitments Do Not Shrink · EUROCRYPT 2012 Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · CRYPTO 2010 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › pairing-based signatures
structure-preserving signatures |
0.5 | 3 | 2016 | Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · J. Cryptol. 2016 Optimal Structure-Preserving Signatures in Asymmetric Bilinear Groups · CRYPTO 2011 Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · CRYPTO 2010 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures |
0.3 | 3 | 2011 | Optimal Structure-Preserving Signatures in Asymmetric Bilinear Groups · CRYPTO 2011 Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · CRYPTO 2010 Cryptography against Continuous Memory Attacks · FOCS 2010 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › pairing-based cryptography
structure-preserving cryptography |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · J. Cryptol. 2016 |
Authentication and access control
anonymous credentials |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Composable and Modular Anonymous Credentials: Definitions and Practical Constructions · ASIACRYPT (2) 2015 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
leakage-resilient cryptography |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Cryptography against Continuous Memory Attacks · FOCS 2010 Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage · ASIACRYPT 2010 |
Storage systems › secure storage
secure deletion |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Policy-based secure deletion · CCS 2013 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Policy-based secure deletion · CCS 2013 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key encryption
chosen-ciphertext security |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Structure Preserving CCA Secure Encryption and Applications · ASIACRYPT 2011 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
public-key encryption |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Structure Preserving CCA Secure Encryption and Applications · ASIACRYPT 2011 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
authenticated key exchange |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Cryptography against Continuous Memory Attacks · FOCS 2010 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
public-key cryptography |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage · ASIACRYPT 2010 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › composable security
universally composable security |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Composable and Modular Anonymous Credentials: Definitions and Practical Constructions · ASIACRYPT (2) 2015 |
Storage systems
file systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2013 | Policy-based secure deletion · CCS 2013 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
bilinear groups |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | Optimal Structure-Preserving Signatures in Asymmetric Bilinear Groups · CRYPTO 2011 |
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
key leakage |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage · ASIACRYPT 2010 |
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage · ASIACRYPT 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
encryption-based deletion · 0.3directed acyclic graph policy · 0.3bilinear groups · 0.2group commitments · 0.1bilinear pairing · 0.1leakage-resilient construction · 0.1k-linear assumption · 0.1homomorphic NIZK · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements
Masayuki Abe, Georg Fuchsbauer, Jens Groth, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo |
J. Cryptol. | 4 |
| 2015 | Composable and Modular Anonymous Credentials: Definitions and Practical Constructions
Jan Camenisch, Maria Dubovitskaya, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Markulf Kohlweiss |
ASIACRYPT (2) | 3 |
| 2013 | Policy-based secure deletionabstractSecurely deleting data from storage systems has become difficult today. Most storage space is provided as a virtual resource and traverses many layers between the user and the actual physical storage medium. Operations to properly erase data and wipe out all its traces are typically not foreseen, particularly not in networked and cloud-storage systems. This paper introduces a general cryptographic model for policy-based secure deletion of data in storage systems, whose security relies on the proper erasure of cryptographic keys. Deletion operations are expressed in terms of a policy that describes data destruction through deletion attributes and protection classes. The policy links attributes as specified in deletion operations to the protection class(es) that must be erased accordingly. A cryptographic construction is presented for deletion policies given by directed acyclic graphs; it is built in a modular way from exploiting that secure deletion schemes may be composed with each other. The model and the construction unify and generalize all previous encryption-based techniques for secure deletion. Finally, the paper describes a prototype implementation of a Linux filesystem with policy-based secure deletion. Christian Cachin, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Hsu-Chun Hsiao, Alessandro Sorniotti |
CCS | 2 |
| 2012 | Group to Group Commitments Do Not Shrink
Masayuki Abe, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo |
EUROCRYPT | 2 |
| 2011 | Double-Trapdoor Anonymous Tags for Traceable Signatures
Masayuki Abe, Sherman S. M. Chow, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo |
ACNS | 3 |
| 2011 | Structure Preserving CCA Secure Encryption and Applications
Jan Camenisch, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Markulf Kohlweiss, Jorn Lapon, Vincent Naessens |
ASIACRYPT | 2 |
| 2011 | Optimal Structure-Preserving Signatures in Asymmetric Bilinear Groups
Masayuki Abe, Jens Groth, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo |
CRYPTO | 3 |
| 2011 | Non-interactive Confirmer Signatures
Sherman S. M. Chow, Kristiyan Haralambiev |
CT-RSA | 2 |
| 2010 | Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage
Yevgeniy Dodis, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Adriana López-Alt, Daniel Wichs |
ASIACRYPT | 2 |
| 2010 | Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements
Masayuki Abe, Georg Fuchsbauer, Jens Groth, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo |
CRYPTO | 4 |
| 2010 | Cryptography against Continuous Memory AttacksabstractWe say that a cryptographic scheme is Continuous Leakage-Resilient (CLR), if it allows users to refresh their secret keys, using only fresh local randomness, such that: 1. The scheme remains functional after any number of key refreshes, although the public key never changes. Thus, the “outside world'' is neither affected by these key refreshes, nor needs to know about their frequency. 2. The scheme remains secure even if the adversary can continuously leak arbitrary information about the current secret-key, as long as the amount of leaked information is bounded in between any two successive key refreshes. There is no bound on the total amount of information that can be leaked during the lifetime of the system. In this work, we construct a variety of practical CLR schemes, including CLR one-way relations, CLR signatures, CLR identification schemes, and CLR authenticated key agreement protocols. For each of the above, we give general constructions, and then show how to instantiate them efficiently using a well established assumption on bilinear groups, called the K-Linear assumption (for any constant K greater than or equal to 1). Our constructions are highly modular, and we develop many interesting techniques and building-blocks along the way, including: leakage-indistinguishable re-randomizable relations, homomorphic NIZKs, and leakage-of-cipher text non-malleable encryption schemes. Yevgeniy Dodis, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Adriana López-Alt, Daniel Wichs |
FOCS | 2 |
| 2010 | Efficient Message Space Extension for Automorphic Signatures
Masayuki Abe, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo |
ISC | 2 |
| 2004 | Large Scale Experiments for Semantic Labeling of Noun Phrases in Raw Text
Louise Guthrie, Roberto Basili 0001, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto, Kalina Bontcheva, Hamish Cunningham, David Guthrie, Jia Cui, Marco Cammisa, Jerry Cheng-Chieh Liu, Cassia Farria Martin, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Martin Holub, Klaus Macherey, Frederick Jelinek |
LREC | 11 |