Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kristiyan Haralambiev

dblp:75/8178 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 11Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
9 papers
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 65% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 24% Authentication and access control · 8%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
commitment schemes
0.532016
Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · J. Cryptol. 2016
Group to Group Commitments Do Not Shrink · EUROCRYPT 2012
Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · CRYPTO 2010
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › digital signatures › pairing-based signatures
structure-preserving signatures
0.532016
Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · J. Cryptol. 2016
Optimal Structure-Preserving Signatures in Asymmetric Bilinear Groups · CRYPTO 2011
Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · CRYPTO 2010
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
digital signatures
0.332011
Optimal Structure-Preserving Signatures in Asymmetric Bilinear Groups · CRYPTO 2011
Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · CRYPTO 2010
Cryptography against Continuous Memory Attacks · FOCS 2010
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › pairing-based cryptography
structure-preserving cryptography
0.212016
Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements · J. Cryptol. 2016
Authentication and access control
anonymous credentials
0.212015
Composable and Modular Anonymous Credentials: Definitions and Practical Constructions · ASIACRYPT (2) 2015
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
leakage-resilient cryptography
0.222010
Cryptography against Continuous Memory Attacks · FOCS 2010
Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage · ASIACRYPT 2010
Storage systems › secure storage
secure deletion
0.212013
Policy-based secure deletion · CCS 2013
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.212013
Policy-based secure deletion · CCS 2013
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography › public-key encryption
chosen-ciphertext security
0.112011
Structure Preserving CCA Secure Encryption and Applications · ASIACRYPT 2011
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › public-key cryptography
public-key encryption
0.112011
Structure Preserving CCA Secure Encryption and Applications · ASIACRYPT 2011
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › key exchange
authenticated key exchange
0.112010
Cryptography against Continuous Memory Attacks · FOCS 2010
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
public-key cryptography
0.112010
Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage · ASIACRYPT 2010
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › composable security
universally composable security
0.112015
Composable and Modular Anonymous Credentials: Definitions and Practical Constructions · ASIACRYPT (2) 2015
Storage systems
file systems
0.012013
Policy-based secure deletion · CCS 2013
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
bilinear groups
0.012011
Optimal Structure-Preserving Signatures in Asymmetric Bilinear Groups · CRYPTO 2011
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
key leakage
0.012010
Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage · ASIACRYPT 2010
Hardware security and side channels
side-channel attack
0.012010
Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage · ASIACRYPT 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

encryption-based deletion · 0.3directed acyclic graph policy · 0.3bilinear groups · 0.2group commitments · 0.1bilinear pairing · 0.1leakage-resilient construction · 0.1k-linear assumption · 0.1homomorphic NIZK · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements
Masayuki Abe, Georg Fuchsbauer, Jens Groth, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo
J. Cryptol.4
2015 Composable and Modular Anonymous Credentials: Definitions and Practical Constructions
Jan Camenisch, Maria Dubovitskaya, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Markulf Kohlweiss
ASIACRYPT (2)3
2013 Policy-based secure deletion
abstract
Securely deleting data from storage systems has become difficult today. Most storage space is provided as a virtual resource and traverses many layers between the user and the actual physical storage medium. Operations to properly erase data and wipe out all its traces are typically not foreseen, particularly not in networked and cloud-storage systems. This paper introduces a general cryptographic model for policy-based secure deletion of data in storage systems, whose security relies on the proper erasure of cryptographic keys. Deletion operations are expressed in terms of a policy that describes data destruction through deletion attributes and protection classes. The policy links attributes as specified in deletion operations to the protection class(es) that must be erased accordingly. A cryptographic construction is presented for deletion policies given by directed acyclic graphs; it is built in a modular way from exploiting that secure deletion schemes may be composed with each other. The model and the construction unify and generalize all previous encryption-based techniques for secure deletion. Finally, the paper describes a prototype implementation of a Linux filesystem with policy-based secure deletion.
Christian Cachin, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Hsu-Chun Hsiao, Alessandro Sorniotti
CCS2
2012 Group to Group Commitments Do Not Shrink
Masayuki Abe, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo
EUROCRYPT2
2011 Double-Trapdoor Anonymous Tags for Traceable Signatures
Masayuki Abe, Sherman S. M. Chow, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo
ACNS3
2011 Structure Preserving CCA Secure Encryption and Applications
Jan Camenisch, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Markulf Kohlweiss, Jorn Lapon, Vincent Naessens
ASIACRYPT2
2011 Optimal Structure-Preserving Signatures in Asymmetric Bilinear Groups
Masayuki Abe, Jens Groth, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo
CRYPTO3
2011 Non-interactive Confirmer Signatures
Sherman S. M. Chow, Kristiyan Haralambiev
CT-RSA2
2010 Efficient Public-Key Cryptography in the Presence of Key Leakage
Yevgeniy Dodis, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Adriana López-Alt, Daniel Wichs
ASIACRYPT2
2010 Structure-Preserving Signatures and Commitments to Group Elements
Masayuki Abe, Georg Fuchsbauer, Jens Groth, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo
CRYPTO4
2010 Cryptography against Continuous Memory Attacks
abstract
We say that a cryptographic scheme is Continuous Leakage-Resilient (CLR), if it allows users to refresh their secret keys, using only fresh local randomness, such that: 1. The scheme remains functional after any number of key refreshes, although the public key never changes. Thus, the “outside world'' is neither affected by these key refreshes, nor needs to know about their frequency. 2. The scheme remains secure even if the adversary can continuously leak arbitrary information about the current secret-key, as long as the amount of leaked information is bounded in between any two successive key refreshes. There is no bound on the total amount of information that can be leaked during the lifetime of the system. In this work, we construct a variety of practical CLR schemes, including CLR one-way relations, CLR signatures, CLR identification schemes, and CLR authenticated key agreement protocols. For each of the above, we give general constructions, and then show how to instantiate them efficiently using a well established assumption on bilinear groups, called the K-Linear assumption (for any constant K greater than or equal to 1). Our constructions are highly modular, and we develop many interesting techniques and building-blocks along the way, including: leakage-indistinguishable re-randomizable relations, homomorphic NIZKs, and leakage-of-cipher text non-malleable encryption schemes.
Yevgeniy Dodis, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Adriana López-Alt, Daniel Wichs
FOCS2
2010 Efficient Message Space Extension for Automorphic Signatures
Masayuki Abe, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Miyako Ohkubo
ISC2
2004 Large Scale Experiments for Semantic Labeling of Noun Phrases in Raw Text
Louise Guthrie, Roberto Basili 0001, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto, Kalina Bontcheva, Hamish Cunningham, David Guthrie, Jia Cui, Marco Cammisa, Jerry Cheng-Chieh Liu, Cassia Farria Martin, Kristiyan Haralambiev, Martin Holub, Klaus Macherey, Frederick Jelinek
LREC11