Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Uri Klein

dblp:75/932 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › automated reasoning
automated verification
0.112011
Formalization and Automated Verification of RESTful Behavior · CAV 2011
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
hierarchical reinforcement learning
0.012004
Dynamic abstraction in reinforcement learning via clustering · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › hierarchical reinforcement learning
option discovery
0.012004
Dynamic abstraction in reinforcement learning via clustering · ICML 2004
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value-based reinforcement learning
q-learning
0.012004
Dynamic abstraction in reinforcement learning via clustering · ICML 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formalization · 0.2clustering · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Effective Synthesis of Asynchronous Systems from GR(1) Specifications
Uri Klein, Nir Piterman, Amir Pnueli
VMCAI1
2011 Formalization and Automated Verification of RESTful Behavior
Uri Klein, Kedar S. Namjoshi
CAV1
2009 Synthesis of programs from temporal property specifications
abstract
The paper investigates a development process for reactive programs, in which the program is automatically generated (synthesized) from a high-level temporal specification. The method is based on previous results that proposed a similar synthesis method for the automatic construction of hardware designs from their temporal specifications. Thus, the work reported here can be viewed as a generalization of existing methods for the synthesis of synchronous reactive systems into the synthesis of asynchronous systems. In the synchronous case it was possible to identify a restricted subclass of formulas and present an algorithm that solves the synthesis problem for these restricted specifications in polynomial time. Here the results are less definitive in the sense that we can offer some heuristics that may provide polynomial-time solutions only in some of the cases.
Amir Pnueli, Uri Klein
MEMOCODE2
2004 Dynamic abstraction in reinforcement learning via clustering
abstract
We consider a graph theoretic approach for automatic construction of options in a dynamic environment. A map of the environment is generated on-line by the learning agent, representing the topological structure of the state transitions. A clustering algorithm is then used to partition the state space to different regions. Policies for reaching the different parts of the space are separately learned and added to the model in a form of options (macro-actions). The options are used for accelerating the Q-Learning algorithm. We extend the basic algorithm and consider building a map that includes preliminary indication of the location of "interesting" regions of the state space, where the value gradient is significant and additional exploration might be beneficial. Experiments indicate significant speedups, especially in the initial learning phase.
Shie Mannor, Ishai Menache, Amit Hoze, Uri Klein
ICML4