Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raman Sankaran
dblp:75/9367
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 40% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 18% Learning paradigms · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 92% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 8% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Machine learning and data management · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.7 | 2 | 2020 | Learning With Subquadratic Regularization : A Primal-Dual Approach · IJCAI 2020 Spectral Norm Regularization of Orthonormal Representations for Graph Transduction · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning and data management › sparse representation
structured sparsity |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning With Subquadratic Regularization : A Primal-Dual Approach · IJCAI 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
primal-dual method |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning With Subquadratic Regularization : A Primal-Dual Approach · IJCAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Censored Semi-Bandits: A Framework for Resource Allocation with Censored Feedback · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
semi-bandit feedback |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Censored Semi-Bandits: A Framework for Resource Allocation with Censored Feedback · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel learning
multiple kernel learning |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Variable Sparsity Kernel Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 On the Algorithmics and Applications of a Mixed-norm based Kernel Learning Formulation · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning › graph-based semi-supervised learning
graph transduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Spectral Norm Regularization of Orthonormal Representations for Graph Transduction · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Spectral Norm Regularization of Orthonormal Representations for Graph Transduction · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
spectral regularization |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Spectral Norm Regularization of Orthonormal Representations for Graph Transduction · NIPS 2015 |
Mathematical optimization › convex relaxation
semidefinite relaxation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Spectral Norm Regularization of Orthonormal Representations for Graph Transduction · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Variable Sparsity Kernel Learning · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
resource allocation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Censored Semi-Bandits: A Framework for Resource Allocation with Censored Feedback · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonsmooth convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | On the Algorithmics and Applications of a Mixed-norm based Kernel Learning Formulation · NIPS 2009 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Spectral Norm Regularization of Orthonormal Representations for Graph Transduction · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
PAC learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Spectral Norm Regularization of Orthonormal Representations for Graph Transduction · NIPS 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
primal-dual framework · 0.9ADMM · 0.9multiple-play multi-armed bandit · 0.8subgradient method · 0.4inexact proximal method · 0.4FISTA · 0.4combinatorial semi-bandits · 0.4combinatorial semi-bandit · 0.4mirror descent · 0.2l1/l-infinity regularization · 0.2sparsity regularization · 0.1kernel learning · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Learning With Subquadratic Regularization : A Primal-Dual ApproachabstractSubquadratic norms have been studied recently in the context of structured sparsity, which has been shown to be more beneficial than conventional regularizers in applications such as image denoising, compressed sensing, banded covariance estimation, etc. While existing works have been successful in learning structured sparse models such as trees, graphs, their associated optimization procedures have been inefficient because of hard-to-evaluate proximal operators of the norms. In this paper, we study the computational aspects of learning with subquadratic norms in a general setup. Our main contributions are two proximal-operator based algorithms ADMM-η and CP-η, which generically apply to these learning problems with convex loss functions, and achieve a proven rate of convergence of O(1/T) after T iterations. These algorithms are derived in a primal-dual framework, which have not been examined for subquadratic norms. We illustrate the efficiency of the algorithms developed in the context of tree-structured sparsity, where they comprehensively outperform relevant baselines. Raman Sankaran, Francis R. Bach, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Censored Semi-Bandits: A Framework for Resource Allocation with Censored FeedbackabstractIn this paper, we study Censored Semi-Bandits, a novel variant of the semi-bandits problem. The learner is assumed to have a fixed amount of resources, which it allocates to the arms at each time step. The loss observed from an arm is random and depends on the amount of resources allocated to it. More specifically, the loss equals zero if the allocation for the arm exceeds a constant (but unknown) threshold that can be dependent on the arm. Our goal is to learn a feasible allocation that minimizes the expected loss. The problem is challenging because the loss distribution and threshold value of each arm are unknown. We study this novel setting by establishing its `equivalence' to Multiple-Play Multi-Armed Bandits (MP-MAB) and Combinatorial Semi-Bandits. Exploiting these equivalences, we derive optimal algorithms for our setting using existing algorithms for MP-MAB and Combinatorial Semi-Bandits. Experiments on synthetically generated data validate performance guarantees of the proposed algorithms. Arun Verma, Manjesh Kumar Hanawal, Arun Rajkumar, Raman Sankaran |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2017 | Identifying Groups of Strongly Correlated Variables through Smoothed Ordered Weighted L1-normsabstractThe failure of LASSO to identify groups of correlated predictors in linear regression has sparked significant research interest. Recently, various norms were proposed, which can be best described as instances of ordered weighted $\ell_1$ norms (OWL), as an alternative to $\ell_1$ regularization used in LASSO. OWL can identify groups of correlated variables but it forces the model to be constant within a group. This artifact induces unnecessary bias in the model estimation. In this paper we take a submodular perspective and show that OWL can be posed as the Lovász extension of a suitably defined submodular function. The submodular perspective not only explains the group-wise constant behavior of OWL, but also suggests alternatives. The main contribution of this paper is smoothed OWL (SOWL), a new family of norms, which not only identifies the groups but also allows the model to be flexible inside a group. We establish several algorithmic and theoretical properties of SOWL including group identification and model consistency. We also provide algorithmic tools to compute the SOWL norm and its proximal operator, whose computational complexity $O(d\log d)$ is significantly better than that of general purpose solvers in $O(d^2\log d)$. In our experiments, SOWL compares favorably with respect to OWL in the regimes of interest. Raman Sankaran, Francis R. Bach, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2015 | Spectral Norm Regularization of Orthonormal Representations for Graph TransductionabstractRecent literature~\cite{ando} suggests that embedding a graph on an unit sphere leads to better generalization for graph transduction. However, the choice of optimal embedding and an efficient algorithm to compute the same remains open. In this paper, we show that orthonormal representations, a class of unit-sphere graph embeddings are PAC learnable. Existing PAC-based analysis do not apply as the VC dimension of the function class is infinite. We propose an alternative PAC-based bound, which do not depend on the VC dimension of the underlying function class, but is related to the famous Lov\'{a}sz~$\vartheta$ function. The main contribution of the paper is SPORE, a SPectral regularized ORthonormal Embedding for graph transduction, derived from the PAC bound. SPORE is posed as a non-smooth convex function over an \emph{elliptope}. These problems are usually solved as semi-definite programs (SDPs) with time complexity $O(n^6)$. We present, Infeasible Inexact proximal~(IIP): an Inexact proximal method which performs subgradient procedure on an approximate projection, not necessarily feasible. IIP is more scalable than SDP, has an $O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{T}})$ convergence, and is generally applicable whenever a suitable approximate projection is available. We use IIP to compute SPORE where the approximate projection step is computed by FISTA, an accelerated gradient descent procedure. We show that the method has a convergence rate of $O(\frac{1}{\sqrt{T}})$. The proposed algorithm easily scales to 1000's of vertices, while the standard SDP computation does not scale beyond few hundred vertices. Furthermore, the analysis presented here easily extends to the multiple graph setting. Rakesh Shivanna, Bibaswan K. Chatterjee, Raman Sankaran, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Francis R. Bach |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2011 | Variable Sparsity Kernel Learning
Jonathan Aflalo, Aharon Ben-Tal, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, Raman Sankaran |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 5 |
| 2009 | On the Algorithmics and Applications of a Mixed-norm based Kernel Learning FormulationabstractMotivated from real world problems, like object categorization, we study a particular mixed-norm regularization for Multiple Kernel Learning (MKL). It is assumed that the given set of kernels are grouped into distinct components where each component is crucial for the learning task at hand. The formulation hence employs $l_\infty$ regularization for promoting combinations at the component level and $l_1$ regularization for promoting sparsity among kernels in each component. While previous attempts have formulated this as a non-convex problem, the formulation given here is an instance of non-smooth convex optimization problem which admits an efficient Mirror-Descent (MD) based procedure. The MD procedure optimizes over product of simplexes, which is not a well-studied case in literature. Results on real-world datasets show that the new MKL formulation is well-suited for object categorization tasks and that the MD based algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art MKL solvers like \texttt{simpleMKL} in terms of computational effort. Saketha Nath Jagarlapudi, G. Dinesh, Raman Sankaran, Chiranjib Bhattacharyya, Aharon Ben-Tal, K. R. Ramakrishnan |
NIPS | 3 |