Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jack Davis

dblp:75/9400 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Efficient and distributed learning · 75% Trustworthy machine learning · 25%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.412020
Cracking the Black Box: Distilling Deep Sports Analytics · KDD 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.412020
Cracking the Black Box: Distilling Deep Sports Analytics · KDD 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.412020
Cracking the Black Box: Distilling Deep Sports Analytics · KDD 2020
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
model distillation
0.412020
Cracking the Black Box: Distilling Deep Sports Analytics · KDD 2020
Computational social science and digital humanities
sports analytics
0.112020
Cracking the Black Box: Distilling Deep Sports Analytics · KDD 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model tree learning · 0.9linear model tree · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Cracking the Black Box: Distilling Deep Sports Analytics
abstract
This paper addresses the trade-off between Accuracy and Transparency for deep learning applied to sports analytics. Neural nets achieve great predictive accuracy through deep learning, and are popular in sports analytics. But it is hard to interpret a neural net model and harder still to extract actionable insights from the knowledge implicit in it. Therefore, we built a simple and transparent model that mimics the output of the original deep learning model and represents the learned knowledge in an explicit interpretable way. Our mimic model is a linear model tree, which combines a collection of linear models with a regression-tree structure. The tree version of a neural network achieves high fidelity, explains itself, and produces insights for expert stakeholders such as athletes and coaches. We propose and compare several scalable model tree learning heuristics to address the computational challenge from datasets with millions of data points.
Jack Davis, Oliver Schulte, Guiliang Liu
KDD2