Dominance relations are used to prune unnecessary nodes in search graphs, but they are problem-dependent and cannot be derived by a general procedure. The authors identify machine learning of dominance relations and the applicable learning mechanisms. A study of learning dominance relations using learning by experimentation is described. This system has been able to learn dominance relations for the 0/1-knapsack problem, an inventory problem the reliability-by-replication problem, the two-machine flow shop problem, a number of single-machine scheduling problems, and a two-machine scheduling problem. It is considered that the same methodology can be extended to learn dominance relations in general.>

Branch-and-bound algorithms in a system with a two-level memory hierarchy were evaluated. An efficient implementation depends on the disparities in the numbers of subproblems expanded between the depth-first and best-first searches as well as the relative speeds of the main and secondary memories. A best-first search should be used when it expands a much smaller number of subproblems than that of a depth-first search, and the secondary memory is relatively slow. In contrast, a depth-first search should be used when the number of expanded subproblems is close to that of a best-first search. The choice is not as clear for cases in between these cases are studied. Two strategies are proposed and analyzed: a specialized virtual-memory system that matches the architectural design with the characteristics of the existing algorithm, and a modified branch-and-bound algorithm that can be tuned to the characteristic of the problem and the architecture. The latter strategy illustrates that designing a better algorithm is sometimes more effective that tuning the architecture alone.>

Branch-and-bound algorithms are organized and intelligently structured searches of solutions in a combinatorially large problem space. In this paper, we propose an approximate stochastic model of branch-and-bound algorithms with a best-first search. We have estimated the average memory space required and have predicted the average number of subproblems expanded before the process terminates. Both measures are exponentials of sublinear exponent. In addition, we have also compared the number of subproblems expanded in a best-first search to that expanded in a depth-first search. Depth-first search has been found to have computational complexity comparable to best-first search when the lower-bound function is very accurate or very inaccurate; otherwise, best-fit search is usually better. The results obtained are useful in studying the efficient evaluation of branch-and-bound algorithms in a virtual memory environment. They also confirm that approximations are very effective in reducing the total number of iterations.

In this paper, we report the status of study on MANIP, a parallel computer for solving combinatorial extremum-search problems. The most general technique that can be used to solve a wide variety of these problems on a uniprocessor system, optimally or sub-optimally, is the branch-and-bound algorithm. We have adapted and extended branch-and-bound algorithms with lower-bound tests for parallel processing. Three major problems are identified in the design: interconnection networks for supporting the selection of subproblems, anomalies in parallelism and virtual-memory support. A unidirectional ring network has been shown to be the most cost-effective selection network. We provide sufficient conditions so that anomalies can be eliminated under certain conditions and show that anomalies are unavoidable otherwise. Lastly, we develop a modified branch-and-bound algorithm so that the amount of memory space required under a best-first search is significantly reduced.