Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brockway McMillan

dblp:76/2058 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1956
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › source coding › variable-length codes
kraft inequality
0.011956
Two inequalities implied by unique decipherability · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956
Coding theory
source coding
0.011956
Two inequalities implied by unique decipherability · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
uniquely decodable codes
0.011956
Two inequalities implied by unique decipherability · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956
Coding theory › source coding
variable-length codes
0.011956
Two inequalities implied by unique decipherability · IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

inequality derivation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1956 Two inequalities implied by unique decipherability
abstract
Consider a list ofbwords, each word being a string of letters from a given fixed alphabet ofaletters. If every string of words drawn from this list, when written out in letters without additional space marks to separate the words, is uniquely decipherable, then \begin{equation} a^{-l_1} + a^{-l_2} + \cdots + a^{-l_b} \leq 1, \qquad \qquad (1) \end{equation} wherel_i, 1 \leq i \leq b, is the length of theith word in the list. This result extends a remark of J. L. Doob, who derived the same inequality for lists of a more restricted kind. A consequence of (1) and work of Shannon is that this more restricted kind of list suffices in the search for codes with specified amounts of redundancy.
Brockway McMillan
IRE Trans. Inf. Theory1