EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Max Thalmaier
dblp:76/2296
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 95% Integrated circuit design · 5% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
hardware verification |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Analyzing k-step induction to compute invariants for SAT-based property checking · DAC 2010 Unbounded Protocol Compliance Verification Using Interval Property Checking With Invariants · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2008 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
formal verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Analyzing k-step induction to compute invariants for SAT-based property checking · DAC 2010 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › hardware verification
property checking |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Analyzing k-step induction to compute invariants for SAT-based property checking · DAC 2010 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › formal verification
reachability analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Unbounded Protocol Compliance Verification Using Interval Property Checking With Invariants · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2008 |
Integrated circuit design
system-on-chip |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Unbounded Protocol Compliance Verification Using Interval Property Checking With Invariants · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
k-step induction · 0.1abstraction refinement · 0.1SAT-based bounded model checking · 0.1BDD-based analysis · 0.1invariant generation · 0.1interval property checking · 0.1bounded model checking · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Analyzing k-step induction to compute invariants for SAT-based property checkingabstractThis paper proposes enhancements to SAT-based property checking with the goal to increase the spectrum of applications where a proof of unbounded validity of a safety property can be provided. For this purpose, invariants are computed by reachability analysis on an abstract model. The main idea of the paper consists in a BDD-based analysis of k-step-induction on the abstract model and its use to guide a step-wise refinement process of the initial abstraction. The property is then proven on a bounded model of the original design using the computed invariant. The new approach has been applied to formally verify industrial SoC modules. In our experiments, we consider particularly difficult verification tasks occurring in the context of protocol compliance verification using generic, transaction-style verification IPs. In our experiments, numerous properties are proven which either required substantial manual interaction in previous approaches, or cannot be proven at all by other methods available to us. Max Thalmaier, Minh D. Nguyen, Markus Wedler, Dominik Stoffel, Jörg Bormann, Wolfgang Kunz |
DAC | 1 |
| 2009 | A re-use methodology for formal SoC protocol compliance verification
Minh D. Nguyen, Max Thalmaier, Markus Wedler, Dominik Stoffel, Wolfgang Kunz, Jörg Bormann |
FDL | 2 |
| 2008 | Unbounded Protocol Compliance Verification Using Interval Property Checking With InvariantsabstractWe propose a methodology to formally prove protocol compliance for communication blocks in System-on-Chip (SoC) designs. In this methodology, a set of operational properties is specified with respect to the states of a central finite state machine (FSM). This central FSM is called main FSM and controls the overall behavior of the design. In order to prove a set of compliance properties, we developed an approach that combines property checking on a bounded circuit model with an approximate reachability analysis. The property checker determines whether a property is valid for an arbitrary state of the design regardless of its reachability. In order to avoid false negatives, reachability constraints are added to the property, which are generated by an approximate FSM traversal algorithm. We show how the existence of a main FSM can be exploited systematically in the reachability analysis and how to partition both the transition relation and the state space such that the computational complexity is reduced drastically. This makes formal verification of protocol compliance tractable even for large designs with several thousand state variables. Our approach has been applied successfully to verify several industrial designs. Minh D. Nguyen, Max Thalmaier, Markus Wedler, Jörg Bormann, Dominik Stoffel, Wolfgang Kunz |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 2 |