Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Edward J. Nowak
dblp:76/3112
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Integrated circuit design · 94% Memory systems · 6% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design › radio-frequency circuit design
CMOS RFIC |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Status and Direction of Communication Technologies - SiGe BiCMOS and RFCMOS · Proc. IEEE 2005 |
Integrated circuit design
radio-frequency circuit design |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Status and Direction of Communication Technologies - SiGe BiCMOS and RFCMOS · Proc. IEEE 2005 |
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor technology › semiconductor process technology
SiGe BiCMOS |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Status and Direction of Communication Technologies - SiGe BiCMOS and RFCMOS · Proc. IEEE 2005 |
Integrated circuit design › semiconductor devices › device scaling
CMOS scaling limits |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependencies · Proc. IEEE 2001 |
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependencies · Proc. IEEE 2001 |
Integrated circuit design
low-power circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependencies · Proc. IEEE 2001 |
Integrated circuit design
analog and mixed-signal circuits |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Status and Direction of Communication Technologies - SiGe BiCMOS and RFCMOS · Proc. IEEE 2005 |
Memory systems
DRAM |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependencies · Proc. IEEE 2001 |
Memory systems › random-access memory
SRAM |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependencies · Proc. IEEE 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
device physics modeling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Status and Direction of Communication Technologies - SiGe BiCMOS and RFCMOSabstractWe present the status and direction of silicon semiconductor technologies targeted for applications such as wireless, networking, instrumentation, and storage markets. Various technological aspects for multiple branches of RF foundry technologies that are based on the standard foundry compatible CMOS node are discussed - SiGe BiCMOS HP ("high performance") tailored to high-frequency applications, SiGe BiCMOS WL ("cost performance") tailored to wireless/storage applications, and RF-CMOS optimized for low-cost consumer applications. Future opportunities and challenges for advancement in RF technologies are described in light of CMOS and SiGe heterojunction bipolar transistor scaling. In addition, we discuss the maturity of SiGe BiCMOS by looking at the levels of integration and manufacturability. Alvin J. Joseph, David L. Harame, Basanth Jagannathan, Douglas D. Coolbaugh, John Magerlein, Louis D. Lanzerotti, Natalie B. Feilchenfeld, Stephen A. St. Onge, James S. Dunn, Edward J. Nowak |
Proc. IEEE | 11 |
| 2001 | Device scaling limits of Si MOSFETs and their application dependenciesabstractThis paper presents the current state of understanding of the factors that limit the continued scaling of Si complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology and provides an analysis of the ways in which application-related considerations enter into the determination of these limits. The physical origins of these limits are primarily in the tunneling currents, which leak through the various barriers in a MOS field-effect transistor (MOSFET) when it becomes very small, and in the thermally generated subthreshold currents. The dependence of these leakages on MOSFET geometry and structure is discussed along with design criteria for minimizing short-channel effects and other issues related to scaling. Scaling limits due to these leakage currents arise from application constraints related to power consumption and circuit functionality. We describe how these constraints work out for some of the most important application classes: dynamic random access memory (DRAM), static random access memory (SRAM), low-power portable devices, and moderate and high-performance CMOS logic. As a summary, we provide a table of our estimates of the scaling limits for various applications and device types. The end result is that there is no single end point for scaling, but that instead there are many end points, each optimally adapted to its particular applications. David J. Frank, Robert H. Dennard, Edward J. Nowak, Paul M. Solomon, Yuan Taur, H.-S. Philip Wong |
Proc. IEEE | 3 |
| 1996 | Practical performance/power alternatives within an existing CMOS technology generationabstractThe tremendous demand for advanced microprocessors is making developers offer a superior product at a competitive price which meets specific performance, power, and reliability requirements. Today's products are designed and built with essentially the same design, fabrication, and test tools used by all industry manufacturers and are constrained by the same device physics, package impedance, heat dissipation capability, and battery energy density limitations. In addition, the current technology generation presents a new set of difficult challenges for the treatment of power dissipation. Lowering voltage to reduce power diminishes FET overdrive and the performance of the device. Recapturing performance by migrating quickly to the next scaled technology generation, however, makes low-power designs expensive, and is not always necessary. Standard full scaling preserves physical and electrical relationships between parameters. On the other hand, selective scaling of specific device parameters may allow the exploitation of existing tools and designs by the use of a different design point on the process "surface". This paper describes recent attempts to explore the feasibility of selective scaling and anticipated constraints associated with future technology generations. Kerry Bernstein, John E. Bertsch, William F. Clark, John J. Ellis-Monaghan, Lawrence G. Heller, Edward J. Nowak |
ISLPED | 6 |