EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniel Wasserrab
dblp:76/3401
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 77% Program verification · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics
formal semantics |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++ · OOPSLA 2006 |
Programming languages and type systems › object-oriented programming
multiple inheritance |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++ · OOPSLA 2006 |
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics
operational semantics |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++ · OOPSLA 2006 |
Programming languages and type systems
object-oriented programming |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++ · OOPSLA 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
Isabelle/HOL · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++abstractWe present an operational semantics and type safety proof for multiple inheritance in C++. The semantics models the behaviour of method calls, field accesses, and two forms of casts in C++ class hierarchies exactly, and the type safety proof was formalized and machine-checked in Isabelle/HOL. Our semantics enables one, for the first time, to understand the behaviour of operations on C++ class hierarchies without referring to implementation-level artifacts such as virtual function tables. Moreover, it can - as the semantics is executable - act as a reference for compilers, and it can form the basis for more advanced correctness proofs of, e.g., automated program transformations. The paper presents the semantics and type safety proof, and a discussion of the many subtleties that we encountered in modeling the intricate multiple inheritance model of C++. Daniel Wasserrab, Tobias Nipkow, Gregor Snelting, Frank Tip |
OOPSLA | 1 |