Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Daniel Wasserrab

dblp:76/3401 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 77% Program verification · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics
formal semantics
0.112006
An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++ · OOPSLA 2006
Programming languages and type systems › object-oriented programming
multiple inheritance
0.112006
An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++ · OOPSLA 2006
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics
operational semantics
0.112006
An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++ · OOPSLA 2006
Programming languages and type systems
object-oriented programming
0.012006
An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++ · OOPSLA 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

Isabelle/HOL · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 An operational semantics and type safety prooffor multiple inheritance in C++
abstract
We present an operational semantics and type safety proof for multiple inheritance in C++. The semantics models the behaviour of method calls, field accesses, and two forms of casts in C++ class hierarchies exactly, and the type safety proof was formalized and machine-checked in Isabelle/HOL. Our semantics enables one, for the first time, to understand the behaviour of operations on C++ class hierarchies without referring to implementation-level artifacts such as virtual function tables. Moreover, it can - as the semantics is executable - act as a reference for compilers, and it can form the basis for more advanced correctness proofs of, e.g., automated program transformations. The paper presents the semantics and type safety proof, and a discussion of the many subtleties that we encountered in modeling the intricate multiple inheritance model of C++.
Daniel Wasserrab, Tobias Nipkow, Gregor Snelting, Frank Tip
OOPSLA1