Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Talbot
dblp:76/5327
· DBLP profile ↗
12ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-9675-2703ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 6 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 37% Efficient and distributed learning · 25% Machine translation · 24% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 73% Computational complexity · 27% |
Topics — the 20 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › structured pruning
attention head pruning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Pruned · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Pruned · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Pruned · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › multi-head attention
multi-head self-attention |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Pruned · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
neural machine translation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Pruned · ACL (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be Pruned · ACL (1) 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
statistical machine translation |
0.2 | 4 | 2011 | Modelling Lexical Redundancy for Machine Translation · ACL 2006 Statistical Machine Translation with Word- and Sentence-Aligned Parallel Corpora · ACL 2004 Watermarking the Outputs of Structured Prediction with an application in Statistical Machine Translation · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
morphological analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Language-independent compound splitting with morphological operations · ACL 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Training a Parser for Machine Translation Reordering · EMNLP 2011 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
word reordering |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Training a Parser for Machine Translation Reordering · EMNLP 2011 |
Data stream processing
approximate counting |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Succinct Approximate Counting of Skewed Data · IJCAI 2009 |
Computational complexity › counting problems
approximate counting |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Succinct Approximate Counting of Skewed Data · IJCAI 2009 |
Algorithms and data structures › space-efficient algorithms
succinct data structures |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Succinct Approximate Counting of Skewed Data · IJCAI 2009 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
neural language model |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Randomized Language Models via Perfect Hash Functions · ACL 2008 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures
hashing |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Randomized Language Models via Perfect Hash Functions · ACL 2008 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › hashing
perfect hashing |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Randomized Language Models via Perfect Hash Functions · ACL 2008 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Statistical Machine Translation with Word- and Sentence-Aligned Parallel Corpora · ACL 2004 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › statistical machine translation
word alignment |
0.0 | 1 | 2004 | Statistical Machine Translation with Word- and Sentence-Aligned Parallel Corpora · ACL 2004 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
parallel corpora |
0.0 | 1 | 2006 | Modelling Lexical Redundancy for Machine Translation · ACL 2006 |
Empirical software engineering
software engineering practice |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Towards Systems Engineering: A Personal View of Progress · ICSE 1990 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gates · 0.4l0 penalty · 0.4sketching · 0.2perfect hash functions · 0.2watermarking · 0.1parser training · 0.1morphological operations · 0.1randomisation · 0.1model selection · 0.1markov random field · 0.1IBM models · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Analyzing Multi-Head Self-Attention: Specialized Heads Do the Heavy Lifting, the Rest Can Be PrunedabstractMulti-head self-attention is a key component of the Transformer, a state-of-the-art architecture for neural machine translation.In this work we evaluate the contribution made by individual attention heads in the encoder to the overall performance of the model and analyze the roles played by them.We find that the most important and confident heads play consistent and often linguistically-interpretable roles.When pruning heads using a method based on stochastic gates and a differentiable relaxation of the L 0 penalty, we observe that specialized heads are last to be pruned.Our novel pruning method removes the vast majority of heads without seriously affecting performance.For example, on the English-Russian WMT dataset, pruning 38 out of 48 encoder heads results in a drop of only 0.15 BLEU. 1 Elena Voita, David Talbot, Fedor Moiseev, Rico Sennrich, Ivan Titov 0001 |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2011 | Language-independent compound splitting with morphological operations
Klaus Macherey, Andrew M. Dai, David Talbot, Ashok C. Popat, Franz Josef Och |
ACL | 3 |
| 2011 | Training a Parser for Machine Translation Reordering
Jason Katz-Brown, Slav Petrov, Ryan T. McDonald, Franz Josef Och, David Talbot, Hiroshi Ichikawa, Masakazu Seno, Hideto Kazawa |
EMNLP | 5 |
| 2011 | Watermarking the Outputs of Structured Prediction with an application in Statistical Machine Translation
Ashish Venugopal, Jakob Uszkoreit, David Talbot, Franz Josef Och, Juri Ganitkevitch |
EMNLP | 3 |
| 2009 | Succinct Approximate Counting of Skewed Data
David Talbot |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2008 | Randomized Language Models via Perfect Hash Functions
David Talbot, Thorsten Brants |
ACL | 1 |
| 2007 | Randomised Language Modelling for Statistical Machine Translation
David Talbot, Miles Osborne |
ACL | 1 |
| 2007 | Smoothed Bloom Filter Language Models: Tera-Scale LMs on the Cheap
David Talbot, Miles Osborne |
EMNLP-CoNLL | 1 |
| 2006 | Modelling Lexical Redundancy for Machine TranslationabstractCertain distinctions made in the lexicon of one language may be redundant when translating into another language. We quantify redundancy among source types by the similarity of their distributions over target types. We propose a language-independent framework for minimising lexical redundancy that can be optimised directly from parallel text. Optimisation of the source lexicon for a given target language is viewed as model selection over a set of cluster-based translation models.Redundant distinctions between types may exhibit monolingual regularities, for example, inflexion patterns. We define a prior over model structure using a Markov random field and learn features over sets of monolingual types that are predictive of bilingual redundancy. The prior makes model selection more robust without the need for language-specific assumptions regarding redundancy. Using these models in a phrase-based SMT system, we show significant improvements in translation quality for certain language pairs. David Talbot, Miles Osborne |
ACL | 1 |
| 2005 | Constrained EM for parallel text alignmentabstractStandard parameter estimation schemes for statistical translation models can struggle to find reasonable settings on some parallel corpora. We show how auxiliary information can be used to constrain the procedure directly by restricting the set of alignments explored during parameter estimation. This enables the integration of bilingual and monolingual knowledge sources while retaining the flexibility of the underlying models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach for incorporating linguistic and domain-specific constraints on various parallel corpora, and consider the importance of using the context of the parallel text to guide the application of such constraints. David Talbot |
Nat. Lang. Eng. | 1 |
| 2004 | Statistical Machine Translation with Word- and Sentence-Aligned Parallel CorporaabstractThe parameters of statistical translation models are typically estimated from sentence-aligned parallel corpora. We show that significant improvements in the alignment and translation quality of such models can be achieved by additionally including word-aligned data during training. Incorporating word-level alignments into the parameter estimation of the IBM models reduces alignment error rate and increases the Bleu score when compared to training the same models only on sentence-aligned data. On the Verbmobil data set, we attain a 38% reduction in the alignment error rate and a higher Bleu score with half as many training examples. We discuss how varying the ratio of word-aligned to sentence-aligned data affects the expected performance gain. Chris Callison-Burch, David Talbot, Miles Osborne |
ACL | 2 |
| 1990 | Towards Systems Engineering: A Personal View of Progress
David Talbot |
ICSE | 1 |