Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cheng Guo 0003
dblp:76/5349-3
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-9883-6129ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Authentication and access control · 77% Usable security · 23% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control › user authentication
social authentication |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Effect of Mood, Location, Trust, and Presence of Others on Video-Based Social Authentication · USENIX Security Symposium 2021 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Effect of Mood, Location, Trust, and Presence of Others on Video-Based Social Authentication
Cheng Guo 0003, Brianne Campbell, Apu Kapadia, Michael K. Reiter, Kelly Caine |
USENIX Security Symposium | 1 |
| 2021 | Anonymity, User Engagement, Quality, and Trolling on Q&A SitesabstractIn online question and answer (Q&A) communities, people ask questions and share answers at all levels of topic sensitivity. Identity options within these communities range from anonymity to real name. The amount of engagement, and the quality of engagement on Q&A sites may differ depending on the identity options available. In this paper, we investigate the relationship between the amount of engagement, the quality of engagement, and different types of identity by analyzing three Q&A sites with different identity policies. We find that highly sensitive questions are more likely to be asked anonymously. Furthermore, allowing anonymity does not affect answer quality and only has a weak, negative indirect effect on engagement. On the other hand, anonymity leads to more trolling. We suggest online communities provide a way for users to ask highly sensitive questions anonymously and pair this with moderation mechanisms to reduce trolling Cheng Guo 0003, Kelly Caine |
Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. | 1 |