Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David R. Morse
dblp:76/6315
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 5Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Interaction techniques and input · 77% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Interaction techniques and input
mobile interaction |
0.0 | 1 | 2000 | Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environments · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2000 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
species identification |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Expert systems: frames, rules or logic for species identification? · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1987 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
taxonomy |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Expert systems: frames, rules or logic for species identification? · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
prototype design · 0.0field trial · 0.0rule-based reasoning · 0.0probabilistic identification · 0.0frame-based representation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | From XML to XML: The Why and How of Making the Biodiversity Literature Accessible to Researchers
Alistair Willis, David King, David R. Morse, Anton Dil, Chris Lyal, Dave Roberts |
LREC | 3 |
| 2002 | Direct Combination: A New User Interaction
Simon Holland, David R. Morse, Henrik Gedenryd |
Mobile HCI | 2 |
| 2002 | AudioGPS: Spatial Audio Navigation with a Minimal Attention Interface
Simon Holland, David R. Morse, Henrik Gedenryd |
Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. | 2 |
| 2001 | editoral: Situated Interaction and Context-Aware Computing
Anind K. Dey, Gerd Kortuem, David R. Morse, Albrecht Schmidt 0001 |
Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. | 3 |
| 2000 | Using while moving: HCI issues in fieldwork environmentsabstractUsing while moving" is the basic ability fieldwork users require of a mobile computer system.These users come from a wide range of backgrounds but have in common an extremely mobile and dynamic workplace.We identify four specific characteristics of this class of users: dynamic user configuration, limited attention capacity, high-speed interaction, and context dependency.A prototype is then presented that was designed to assist fieldworkers in data collection tasks and to explore the HCI design issues involved.The prototype was used in an extensive field trial by a group of ecologists observing giraffe behavior in Kenya.Following this trial, improvements were made to the prototype interface which in turn was tested in a subsequent field trial with another group of ecologists.From this experience, we have formulated our resulting ideas about interface design for fieldworkers into two general principles: Minimal Attention User Interfaces (MAUIs) and context awareness.The MAUI seeks to minimize the attention, though not necessarily the number of interactions, required from the user in operating a device.Context awareness enables the mobile device to provide assistance based on a knowledge of its environment. Jason Pascoe, Nick Ryan, David R. Morse |
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. | 3 |
| 1998 | Developing Personal Technologies for the Field
Jason Pascoe, David R. Morse, Nick Ryan |
Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. | 2 |
| 1987 | Expert systems: frames, rules or logic for species identification?abstractThe role of expert systems in species identification, with particular reference to the problems posed by damaged specimens and inexperienced taxonomists, is discussed. Of the three main types of expert systems available, the frame-based system is shown to provide the most appropriate model for a taxonomic expert system rather than a logic- or rule-based system. The advantages of an expert system over other computer-aided methods of identification are considered. A rule-based system requires the original knowledge (species descriptions) to be structured into rules, whereas a frame-based system can store the generic and specific descriptions in a series of frames. The frames fall into a hierarchy which closely resembles the taxonomic hierarchy, and down which information can be inherited. Two aspects of frame-based systems considered are the use of probabilities in identification, and the optimum structure of the knowledge base. The conventional use of probabilities is to provide an indication of the correctness of the result. However, in some studies involving the identification of many specimens, the speed of identification may be increased (with a reduction in accuracy) if identifications are made to a predetermined probability level. Although frames allow accurate representation of the taxonomic hierarchy, a semantic net, incorporating structures of the organism and/or details of the habitat may result in a more efficient expert system. Marion Edwards, David R. Morse, Alan H. Fielding |
Comput. Appl. Biosci. | 2 |