Thomas S. Anantharaman

dblp:76/6503 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
11ranked-venue papers
9as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 92% Language models and text generation · 8%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Electronic design automation · 65% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 35%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
optical mapping
0.021999
Genomics via Optical Mapping III: Contiging Genomic DNA · ISMB 1999
New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
contig assembly
0.011999
Genomics via Optical Mapping III: Contiging Genomic DNA · ISMB 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome analysis
genome mapping
0.011999
Genomics via Optical Mapping III: Contiging Genomic DNA · ISMB 1999
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
genome assembly
0.011998
New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.011998
New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
physical mapping
0.011998
New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › DNA sequence analysis
restriction mapping
0.011998
New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules · RECOMB 1998
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › state space search
brute-force search
0.011990
Singular Extensions: Adding Selectivity to Brute-Force Searching · Artif. Intell. 1990
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
game tree search
0.011990
Singular Extensions: Adding Selectivity to Brute-Force Searching · Artif. Intell. 1990
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures › signal processing accelerator
speech recognition accelerator
0.011986
A Hardware Accelerator for Speech Recognition Algorithms · ISCA 1986
Electronic design automation
high-level synthesis
0.011985
Compiling Path Expressions into VLSI Circuits · POPL 1985
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
beam search
0.011986
A Hardware Accelerator for Speech Recognition Algorithms · ISCA 1986
Concurrent programming › synchronization
process synchronization
0.011985
Compiling Path Expressions into VLSI Circuits · POPL 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

single-molecule imaging · 0.0restriction endonuclease mapping · 0.0architectural simulation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2001 False Positives in Genomic Map Assembly and Sequence Validation
Thomas S. Anantharaman, Bud Mishra
WABI1
1999 Genomics via Optical Mapping III: Contiging Genomic DNA
Thomas S. Anantharaman, Bud Mishra, David C. Schwartz
ISMB1
1998 New approaches to genomic analysis using single molecules
abstract
Current moIecuIar bioIogy techniques were deveIoped primarily for characterization of single genes, not entire genomes, and, as such, are not ideally suited to high resolution analysis of complex traits and the moiecular genetics of very large populations.Despite rapid progress in the human genome project effort, there is little doubt that radicaIIy new conceptual approaches are needed before routine whole genome-based analyses can be undertaken by both basic research and clinical laboratories.Physical mapping of genomes, using restriction endonucleases, has played a major role in the identification and characterizing various loci, for example, by aiding clone contig formation and by characterizing genetic lesions.Restriction maps provide precise genomic distances, unlike ordered sequencebased landmarks such as Sequence Tagged Sites (ST%), that are essential for optimizing the efficiency of sequencing efforts, and for determining the spatial relationships of specific loci.When compared to tedious hybridization-based fingerprinting approaches, ordered restriction maps offer relatively unambiguous clone characterization that is useful in contig formation, establishment of minimal tiling paths for sequencing, and preliminary characterization of sequence lesions.In addition, such maps provide a useful scaffold for sequence assembly, often critical in the final sequence finishing stage.Despite the broad applications of restriction maps, the associated techniques for their generation have changed little over the last ten years, primarily because they still utilize electrophoretic analysis.To help overcome these shortcomings, our laboratory developed the first practical non-electrophoretic genomic mapping approach, Optical Mapping, to meet this need.Optical Mapping is a single molecule methodology for the rapid production of ordered restriction
David C. Schwartz, Thomas S. Anantharaman, C. Aston, Bud Mishra, V. Clarke, D. Gebauer, S. Delobette, E. Dimalanta, J. Edington, J. Evenzehav, J. Giacalone, C. Hiort, E. Huff, J. Jing, Z. Lai, B. Porter, R. Qi, Y. Skiadis
RECOMB2
1997 Statistical Algorithms and Software for Genomics
abstract
There are many large system problems that are hard to model exactly or in a computationally tractable fashion. Examples include the mapping of human DNA, speech recognition, and automated learning in computer chess. Traditional artificial intelligence solution techniques for such problems rely on a combination of custom encoding of expert knowledge and heuristic search. They take much time to hand craft and then often are unable to take advantage of faster computers as they become available. In this context, the authors explore the advantage of using statistical search techniques in which the knowledge is encoded in some form of statistical model whose parameters are automatically adjusted or trained with domain data. The benefits are faster development times, greater solution accuracy (compared to hand crafted solutions) and the ability to allow the problem size and desired solution accuracy to be scaled up with computational resources. They apply this approach to certain critical computational problems in mapping the human genome. They use a Bayesian model to provide the best solution accuracy as a function of the number of parameters. Heuristic search techniques derived from artificial intelligence are used to search the model space in an efficient manner in the average case.
Thomas S. Anantharaman, Bud Mishra
COMPSAC1
1990 Singular Extensions: Adding Selectivity to Brute-Force Searching
Thomas S. Anantharaman, Murray Campbell, Feng-Hsiung Hsu
Artif. Intell.1
1989 BEAM. An accelerator for speech recognition
abstract
BEAM is a hardware accelerator that has been designed and built for real-time execution of the SPHINX speaker-independent, continuous-speech recognition system and similar systems. SPHINX on BEAM is able to recognize sentences from a 1000-word vocabulary and a perplexity-60 grammar in about 1.3 times real time. BEAM does not use any custom integrated circuits. The architecture of the accelerator is described. Performance data are given and compared with those for other architectures. It is concluded that BEAM demonstrates how general-purpose technology can be used to build systems that are substantially faster than general-purpose systems.>
Roberto Bisiani, Thomas S. Anantharaman, L. Butcher
ICASSP2
1986 A Hardware Accelerator for Speech Recognition Algorithms
abstract
This paper describes two custom architectures tailored to a speech recognition beam search algorithm. Both architectures have been simulated using real data and the results of the simulation are presented. The paper also describes the design process of the custom architectures and presents a number of ideas on the automatic design of custom systems for data dependent computations.
Thomas S. Anantharaman, Roberto Bisiani
ISCA1
1986 Compiling Path Expressions Into VLSI Circuits
Thomas S. Anantharaman, Edmund M. Clarke, Michael J. Foster, Bud Mishra
Distributed Comput.1
1985 Custom data-flow machines for speech recognition
abstract
The goal of the paper is to present some of the design characteristics and performance of a special purpose custom machine that has the potential of improving the speed of the implementation of a beam search algorithm by two orders of magnitude when compared with a general purpose architecture implementation. The paper also describes the architecture of a general purpose self-timed device that can be used in implementing such a machine.
Thomas S. Anantharaman, Roberto Bisiani
ICASSP1
1985 Compiling Path Expressions into VLSI Circuits
abstract
Path expressions were originally proposed by Campbell and Habermann [1] as a mechanism for process synchronization at the monitor level in software. Not unexpectedly, they also provide a useful notation for specifying the behavior of asynchronous circuits. Motivated by this potential application we investigate how to directly translate path expressions into hardware.
Thomas S. Anantharaman, Edmund M. Clarke, Michael J. Foster, Bud Mishra
POPL1
1984 A family of custom VLSI circuits for speech recognition
abstract
The design of a custom VLSI circuit that has the potential of achieving a high throughput when executing one of the most computationally expensive modules of a speech recognition system is presented. The architecture of the device is described in terms, of a set of self-timed building blocks that implement arithmetic operations, storage and input/output functions. The formalism used to describe the architecture makes it easy to define variations of the basic structure in order to deal with recognition systems that use different heuristics and search different kinds of databases. A tool that helps the designer investigate the area/speed trade-offs is also described.
Thomas S. Anantharaman, Marco Annaratone, Roberto Bisiani
ICASSP1