Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nathalie Harder
dblp:76/6906
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
0000-0002-6171-6462ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 66% Medical and health informatics · 34% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Image recognition and object detection · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
cell tracking |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms · Bioinform. 2014 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms · Bioinform. 2014 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cell type annotation
cell classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Feature Selection for Evaluating Fluorescence Microscopy Images in Genome-Wide Cell Screens · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics › bioimage analysis › microscopy image analysis
fluorescence microscopy |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Feature Selection for Evaluating Fluorescence Microscopy Images in Genome-Wide Cell Screens · CVPR (1) 2006 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › bioimage informatics
cell segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms · Bioinform. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
performance evaluation · 0.2benchmarking · 0.2support vector machine · 0.1random forest · 0.1principal component analysis · 0.1neural gas · 0.1k-means · 0.1independent component analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithmsabstractMOTIVATION: Automatic tracking of cells in multidimensional time-lapse fluorescence microscopy is an important task in many biomedical applications. A novel framework for objective evaluation of cell tracking algorithms has been established under the auspices of the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2013 Cell Tracking Challenge. In this article, we present the logistics, datasets, methods and results of the challenge and lay down the principles for future uses of this benchmark. RESULTS: The main contributions of the challenge include the creation of a comprehensive video dataset repository and the definition of objective measures for comparison and ranking of the algorithms. With this benchmark, six algorithms covering a variety of segmentation and tracking paradigms have been compared and ranked based on their performance on both synthetic and real datasets. Given the diversity of the datasets, we do not declare a single winner of the challenge. Instead, we present and discuss the results for each individual dataset separately. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The challenge Web site (http://www.codesolorzano.com/celltrackingchallenge) provides access to the training and competition datasets, along with the ground truth of the training videos. It also provides access to Windows and Linux executable files of the evaluation software and most of the algorithms that competed in the challenge. Martin Maska, Vladimír Ulman, David Svoboda, Pavel Matula, Petr Matula, Cristina Ederra, Ainhoa Urbiola, Tomás España, Subramanian Venkatesan 0001, Deepak M. W. Balak, Pavel Karas, Tereza Bolcková, Markéta Streitová, Craig Carthel, Stefano Coraluppi, Nathalie Harder, Karl Rohr, Klas E. G. Magnusson, Joakim Jaldén, Helen M. Blau, Oleh Dzyubachyk, Pavel Krízek, Guy M. Hagen, David Pastor-Escuredo, Daniel Jimenez-Carretero, María J. Ledesma-Carbayo, Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia, Erik Meijering, Michal Kozubek 0001, Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano |
Bioinform. | 16 |
| 2014 | Characterizing Protein Interactions Employing a Genome-Wide siRNA Cellular Phenotyping ScreenabstractCharacterizing the activating and inhibiting effect of protein-protein interactions (PPI) is fundamental to gain insight into the complex signaling system of a human cell. A plethora of methods has been suggested to infer PPI from data on a large scale, but none of them is able to characterize the effect of this interaction. Here, we present a novel computational development that employs mitotic phenotypes of a genome-wide RNAi knockdown screen and enables identifying the activating and inhibiting effects of PPIs. Exemplarily, we applied our technique to a knockdown screen of HeLa cells cultivated at standard conditions. Using a machine learning approach, we obtained high accuracy (82% AUC of the receiver operating characteristics) by cross-validation using 6,870 known activating and inhibiting PPIs as gold standard. We predicted de novo unknown activating and inhibiting effects for 1,954 PPIs in HeLa cells covering the ten major signaling pathways of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and made these predictions publicly available in a database. We finally demonstrate that the predicted effects can be used to cluster knockdown genes of similar biological processes in coherent subgroups. The characterization of the activating or inhibiting effect of individual PPIs opens up new perspectives for the interpretation of large datasets of PPIs and thus considerably increases the value of PPIs as an integrated resource for studying the detailed function of signaling pathways of the cellular system of interest. Apichat Suratanee, Martin H. Schaefer 0001, Matthew J. Betts, Zita Soons, Heiko A. Mannsperger, Nathalie Harder, Marcus Oswald, Markus Gipp, Ellen Ramminger, Guillermo Marcus Martinez, Reinhard Männer, Karl Rohr, Erich E. Wanker, Robert B. Russell, Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro, Roland Eils, Rainer König |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 6 |
| 2006 | Feature Selection for Evaluating Fluorescence Microscopy Images in Genome-Wide Cell ScreensabstractWe investigate different approaches for efficient feature space reduction and compare different methods for cell classification. The application context is the development of automatic methods for analysing fluorescence microscopy images with the goal to identify those genes that are involved in the mitosis of human cells (cell division). We distinguish four cell classes comprising interphase cells, mitotic cells, apoptotic cells, and cells with clustered nuclei. Feature space reduction was performed using the Principal Component Analysis and Independent Component Analysis methods. Six classification methods were examined including unsupervised clustering algorithms such as K-means, Hard Competitive Learning, and Neural Gas as well as Hierarchical Clustering, Support Vector Machines, and Random Forests classifiers. Detailed results on the cell image classification accuracy and computational efficiency achieved using different feature sets and different classification methods are reported. Vassili Kovalev, Nathalie Harder, Beate Neumann, Michael Held, Urban Liebel, Holger Erfle, Jan Ellenberg, Roland Eils, Karl Rohr |
CVPR (1) | 2 |
| 2006 | Automated Analysis of the Mitotic Phases of Human Cells in 3D Fluorescence Microscopy Image Sequences
Nathalie Harder, Felipe Mora-Bermúdez, William J. Godinez, Jan Ellenberg, Roland Eils, Karl Rohr |
MICCAI (1) | 1 |