MOTIVATION: Homology or comparative modeling is currently the most accurate method to predict the three-dimensional structure of proteins. It generally consists in four steps: (1) databanks searching to identify the structural homolog, (2) target-template alignment, (3) model building and optimization, and (4) model evaluation. The target-template alignment step is generally accepted as the most critical step in homology modeling. RESULTS: We present here ESyPred3D, a new automated homology modeling program. The method gets benefit of the increased alignment performances of a new alignment strategy. Alignments are obtained by combining, weighting and screening the results of several multiple alignment programs. The final three-dimensional structure is build using the modeling package MODELLER. ESyPred3D was tested on 13 targets in the CASP4 experiment (Critical Assessment of Techniques for Proteins Structural Prediction). Our alignment strategy obtains better results compared to PSI-BLAST alignments and ESyPred3D alignments are among the most accurate compared to those of participants having used the same template. AVAILABILITY: ESyPred3D is available through its web site at http://www.fundp.ac.be/urbm/bioinfo/esypred/ CONTACT: [email protected]; http://www.fundp.ac.be/~lambertc

MOTIVATION: The prediction reliability of seven multiple alignment servers currently available on the Internet (ClustalW, MAP, PIMA, Block Maker, MSA, MEME and Match-Box) has been evaluated in terms of power (sensitivity) and confidence (selectivity). Therefore, the alignments obtained have been respectively compared to refined structural alignments for 20 families of related proteins with low levels of identity. RESULTS: Results clearly show that any powerful method remains reliable when the rate of identity falls. For some methods, power and confidence decrease linearly with the rate of identity, while other methods emphasize reliability at the cost of a lower power. Increasing the number of related sequences included in the alignment may either improve or decrease the quality of the predictions substantially. For some methods, the gain in power or in confidence is quite systematic; for others, the effect of the addition of homologous sequences is highly unpredictable. Extracting the consensus between two different methods may increase the overall confidence of the predictions tremendously. Our conclusions induce users of sequence alignment methods on the Internet to select the most suitable technique according to their requirements in terms of selectivity and sensitivity. AVAILABILITY: The aligned sequences of the 20 alignments of structure can be obtained automatically by sending the message 'send: cabios_tests.txt' by e-mail to '[email protected]'. CONTACT: [email protected]

MOTIVATION: The Match-Box software comprises protein sequence alignment tools based on strict statistical thresholds of similarity between protein segments. The method circumvents the gap penalty requirement: gaps being the result of the alignment and not a governing parameter of the procedure. The reliable conserved regions outlined by Match-Box are particularly relevant for homology modelling of protein structures, prediction of essential residues for site-directed mutagenesis and oligonucleotide design for cloning homologous genes by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: The method produces reliable results, as assessed by tests performed on protein families of known structures and of low sequence similarity. A reliability score is computed in relation to a threshold of similarity progressively raised to extend the aligned regions to their maximal length, up to the significance limit of matching segments. The score obtained at each position is printed below the sequences and allows a discriminant reading of each aligned region. AVAILABILITY: Sequences may be submitted to a Web server at http://www.fundp.ac.be/sciences/biologie/bms/+ ++matchbox_submit.html or sent by e-mail to matchbox/biq.fundp.ac.be (help available by just mailing help).