Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Phoenix Kwan

dblp:76/8712 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery
high-throughput screening
0.112010
NoiseMaker: simulated screens for statistical assessment · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › drug screening
hit identification
0.112010
NoiseMaker: simulated screens for statistical assessment · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology
drug discovery
0.012010
NoiseMaker: simulated screens for statistical assessment · Bioinform. 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical assessment · 0.1simulation · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2010 NoiseMaker: simulated screens for statistical assessment
abstract
UNLABELLED: High-throughput screening (HTS) is a common technique for both drug discovery and basic research, but researchers often struggle with how best to derive hits from HTS data. While a wide range of hit identification techniques exist, little information is available about their sensitivity and specificity, especially in comparison to each other. To address this, we have developed the open-source NoiseMaker software tool for generation of realistically noisy virtual screens. By applying potential hit identification methods to NoiseMaker-simulated data and determining how many of the pre-defined true hits are recovered (as well as how many known non-hits are misidentified as hits), one can draw conclusions about the likely performance of these techniques on real data containing unknown true hits. Such simulations apply to a range of screens, such as those using small molecules, siRNAs, shRNAs, miRNA mimics or inhibitors, or gene over-expression; we demonstrate this utility by using it to explain apparently conflicting reports about the performance of the B score hit identification method. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: NoiseMaker is written in C#, an ECMA and ISO standard language with compilers for multiple operating systems. Source code, a Windows installer and complete unit tests are available at http://sourceforge.net/projects/noisemaker. Full documentation and support are provided via an extensive help file and tool-tips, and the developers welcome user suggestions.
Phoenix Kwan, Amanda Birmingham
Bioinform.1