Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
David Michael Barbella
dblp:76/9923
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
analogical reasoning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Analogical Dialogue Acts: Supporting Learning by Reading Analogies in Instructional Texts · AAAI 2011 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
learning by reading |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Analogical Dialogue Acts: Supporting Learning by Reading Analogies in Instructional Texts · AAAI 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structure-mapping theory · 0.1dynamic case construction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Analogical Dialogue Acts: Supporting Learning by Reading Analogies in Instructional TextsabstractAnalogy is heavily used in instructional texts. We introduce the concept of analogical dialogue acts (ADAs), which represent the roles utterances play in instructional analogies. We describe a catalog of such acts, based on ideas from structure-mapping theory. We focus on the operations that these acts lead to while understanding instructional texts, using the Structure-Mapping Engine (SME) and dynamic case construction in a computational model. We test this model on a small corpus of instructional analogies expressed in simplified English, which were understood via a semi-automatic natural language system using analogical dialogue acts. The model enabled a system to answer questions after understanding the analogies that it was not able to answer without them. David Michael Barbella, Kenneth D. Forbus |
AAAI | 1 |