Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Michael Barbella

dblp:76/9923 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
analogical reasoning
0.112011
Analogical Dialogue Acts: Supporting Learning by Reading Analogies in Instructional Texts · AAAI 2011
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge acquisition
learning by reading
0.112011
Analogical Dialogue Acts: Supporting Learning by Reading Analogies in Instructional Texts · AAAI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

structure-mapping theory · 0.1dynamic case construction · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Analogical Dialogue Acts: Supporting Learning by Reading Analogies in Instructional Texts
abstract
Analogy is heavily used in instructional texts. We introduce the concept of analogical dialogue acts (ADAs), which represent the roles utterances play in instructional analogies. We describe a catalog of such acts, based on ideas from structure-mapping theory. We focus on the operations that these acts lead to while understanding instructional texts, using the Structure-Mapping Engine (SME) and dynamic case construction in a computational model. We test this model on a small corpus of instructional analogies expressed in simplified English, which were understood via a semi-automatic natural language system using analogical dialogue acts. The model enabled a system to answer questions after understanding the analogies that it was not able to answer without them.
David Michael Barbella, Kenneth D. Forbus
AAAI1