Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pasi Jylänki

dblp:77/10432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 82% Efficient and distributed learning · 17% Trustworthy machine learning · 1%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
expectation propagation
0.832020
Expectation Propagation as a Way of Life: A Framework for Bayesian Inference on Partitioned Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Expectation propagation for neural networks with sparsity-promoting priors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014
Nested expectation propagation for Gaussian process classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed inference
distributed bayesian inference
0.412020
Expectation Propagation as a Way of Life: A Framework for Bayesian Inference on Partitioned Data · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference
0.322014
Expectation propagation for neural networks with sparsity-promoting priors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014
Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihood · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression
0.222011
Robust Gaussian Process Regression with a Student-t Likelihood · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihood · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › prior modeling
sparsity-inducing prior
0.212014
Expectation propagation for neural networks with sparsity-promoting priors · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2014
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.212013
GPstuff: Bayesian modeling with Gaussian processes · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process classification
0.212013
Nested expectation propagation for Gaussian process classification · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2013
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process › gaussian process regression
robust gaussian process regression
0.112011
Robust Gaussian Process Regression with a Student-t Likelihood · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2011
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation
0.112009
Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihood · NIPS 2009
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.012009
Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihood · NIPS 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

expectation propagation · 0.6laplace approximation · 0.5data partitioning · 0.4gaussian process · 0.2bayesian inference · 0.2student-t likelihood · 0.1gaussian process regression · 0.1variational approximation · 0.1scale mixture representation · 0.1markov chain monte carlo · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Expectation Propagation as a Way of Life: A Framework for Bayesian Inference on Partitioned Data
abstract
A common divide-and-conquer approach for Bayesian computation with big data is to partition the data, perform local inference for each piece separately, and combine the results to obtain a global posterior approximation. While being conceptually and computationally appealing, this method involves the problematic need to also split the prior for the local inferences; these weakened priors may not provide enough regularization for each separate computation, thus eliminating one of the key advantages of Bayesian methods. To resolve this dilemma while still retaining the generalizability of the underlying local inference method, we apply the idea of expectation propagation (EP) as a framework for distributed Bayesian inference. The central idea is to iteratively update approximations to the local likelihoods given the state of the other approximations and the prior. The present paper has two roles: we review the steps that are needed to keep EP algorithms numerically stable, and we suggest a general approach, inspired by EP, for approaching data partitioning problems in a way that achieves the computational benefits of parallelism while allowing each local update to make use of relevant information from the other sites. In addition, we demonstrate how the method can be applied in a hierarchical context to make use of partitioning of both data and parameters. The paper describes a general algorithmic framework, rather than a specific algorithm, and presents an example implementation for it.
Aki Vehtari, Andrew Gelman, Tuomas Sivula, Pasi Jylänki, Dustin Tran, Swupnil Sahai, Paul Blomstedt, John P. Cunningham, David Schiminovich, Christian P. Robert
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2014 Expectation Propagation for Likelihoods Depending on an Inner Product of Two Multivariate Random Variables
abstract
We describe how a deterministic Gaussian posterior approximation can be constructed using expectation propagation (EP) for models, where the likelihood function depends on an inner product of two multivariate random variables. The family of applicable models includes a wide variety of important linear latent variable models used in statistical machine learning, such as principal component and factor analysis, their linear extensions, and errors-in-variables regression. The EP computations are facilitated by an integral transformation of the Dirac delta function, which allows transforming the multidimensional integrals over the two multivariate random variables into an analytically tractable form up to one-dimensional analytically intractable integrals that can be efficiently computed numerically. We study the resulting posterior approximations in sparse principal component analysis with Gaussian and probit likelihoods. Comparisons to Gibbs sampling and variational inference are presented.
Tomi Peltola, Pasi Jylänki, Aki Vehtari
AISTATS2
2014 Expectation propagation for neural networks with sparsity-promoting priors
Pasi Jylänki, Aapo Nummenmaa, Aki Vehtari
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2013 Nested expectation propagation for Gaussian process classification
Jaakko Riihimäki, Pasi Jylänki, Aki Vehtari
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2013 GPstuff: Bayesian modeling with Gaussian processes
Jarno Vanhatalo, Jaakko Riihimäki, Jouni Hartikainen, Pasi Jylänki, Ville Tolvanen, Aki Vehtari
J. Mach. Learn. Res.4
2011 Robust Gaussian Process Regression with a Student-t Likelihood
Pasi Jylänki, Jarno Vanhatalo, Aki Vehtari
J. Mach. Learn. Res.1
2009 Gaussian process regression with Student-t likelihood
abstract
In the Gaussian process regression the observation model is commonly assumed to be Gaussian, which is convenient in computational perspective. However, the drawback is that the predictive accuracy of the model can be significantly compromised if the observations are contaminated by outliers. A robust observation model, such as the Student-t distribution, reduces the influence of outlying observations and improves the predictions. The problem, however, is the analytically intractable inference. In this work, we discuss the properties of a Gaussian process regression model with the Student-t likelihood and utilize the Laplace approximation for approximate inference. We compare our approach to a variational approximation and a Markov chain Monte Carlo scheme, which utilize the commonly used scale mixture representation of the Student-t distribution.
Jarno Vanhatalo, Pasi Jylänki, Aki Vehtari
NIPS2