EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Xiaohong Hao
dblp:77/1153
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3Computer networks · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
3 papers |
Internet of things and sensor networks · 42% Network optimization and economics · 29% Physical-layer communications · 26% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Energy systems and smart grids · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 50% Information theory · 50% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications › signal processing for communications
compressive sensing |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Density-aware compressive crowdsensing · IPSN 2017 Cost-aware compressive sensing for networked sensing systems · IPSN 2015 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
mobile crowdsensing |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Density-aware compressive crowdsensing · IPSN 2017 |
Energy systems and smart grids
energy disaggregation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | On the Balance of Meter Deployment Cost and NILM Accuracy · IJCAI 2015 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments
mobile crowdsourcing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | More with less: lowering user burden in mobile crowdsourcing through compressive sensing · UbiComp 2015 |
Internet of things and sensor networks › wireless sensor network › distributed sensing
networked sensing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Cost-aware compressive sensing for networked sensing systems · IPSN 2015 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
wireless sensor network |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Cost-aware compressive sensing for networked sensing systems · IPSN 2015 |
Network optimization and economics
resource allocation |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | The power of online learning in stochastic network optimization · SIGMETRICS 2014 |
Network optimization and economics
stochastic network optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | The power of online learning in stochastic network optimization · SIGMETRICS 2014 |
Network optimization and economics › resource allocation › network utility maximization
utility-delay tradeoff |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | The power of online learning in stochastic network optimization · SIGMETRICS 2014 |
Internet of things and sensor networks
mobile sensing |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Density-aware compressive crowdsensing · IPSN 2017 |
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › mobile crowdsourcing › crowdsensing
mobile crowdsensing |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | Cost-aware compressive sensing for networked sensing systems · IPSN 2015 |
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing |
0.1 | 1 | 2015 | More with less: lowering user burden in mobile crowdsourcing through compressive sensing · UbiComp 2015 |
Network performance modeling › stability analysis
convergence time analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2014 | The power of online learning in stochastic network optimization · SIGMETRICS 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
compressive sensing · 1.2sparsifying base · 0.4optimization · 0.4cost-aware sampling · 0.4online learning · 0.2lyapunov optimization · 0.2dual learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Adaptive iterative learning control based on particle swarm optimization
Qun Jane Gu, Xiaohong Hao |
J. Supercomput. | 2 |
| 2017 | Density-aware compressive crowdsensingabstractCrowdsensing systems collect large-scale sensor data from mobile devices to provide a wide-area view of phenomena including traffic, noise and air pollution. Because such data often exhibits sparse structure, it is natural to apply compressive sensing (CS) for data sampling and recovery. However in practice, crowd participants are often distributed highly unevenly across the sensing area, and thus the numbers of observations collected over different areas may vary wildly - an issue we call density disparity. Density disparity leads to inaccuracy in low density areas, and potentially undermines the recovery performance if conventional compressive sensing is applied directly, which equally treats data from areas of different density. Xiaohong Hao, Nicholas D. Lane, Xin Liu 0002, Thomas Moscibroda |
IPSN | 1 |
| 2015 | More with less: lowering user burden in mobile crowdsourcing through compressive sensingabstractMobile crowdsourcing is a powerful tool for collecting data of various types. The primary bottleneck in such systems is the high burden placed on the user who must manually collect sensor data or respond in-situ to simple queries (e.g., experience sampling studies). In this work, we present Compressive CrowdSensing (CCS) -- a framework that enables compressive sensing techniques to be applied to mobile crowdsourcing scenarios. CCS enables each user to provide significantly reduced amounts of manually collected data, while still maintaining acceptable levels of overall accuracy for the target crowd-based system. Naïve applications of compressive sensing do not work well for common types of crowdsourcing data (e.g., user survey responses) because the necessary correlations that are exploited by a sparsifying base are hidden and non-trivial to identify. CCS comprises a series of novel techniques that enable such challenges to be overcome. We evaluate CCS with four representative large-scale datasets and find that it is able to outperform standard uses of compressive sensing, as well as conventional approaches to lowering the quantity of user data needed by crowd systems. Xiaohong Hao, Nicholas D. Lane, Xin Liu 0002, Thomas Moscibroda |
UbiComp | 2 |
| 2015 | On the Balance of Meter Deployment Cost and NILM Accuracy
Xiaohong Hao, Bangsheng Tang, Yongcai Wang |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2015 | Cost-aware compressive sensing for networked sensing systemsabstractCompressive Sensing is a technique that can help reduce the sampling rate of sensing tasks. In mobile crowdsensing applications or wireless sensor networks, the resource burden of collecting samples is often a major concern. Therefore, compressive sensing is a promising approach in such scenarios. An implicit assumption underlying compressive sensing -- both in theory and its applications -- is that every sample has the same cost: its goal is to simply reduce the number of samples while achieving a good recovery accuracy. In many networked sensing systems, however, the cost of obtaining a specific sample may depend highly on the location, time, condition of the device, and many other factors of the sample. Xiaohong Hao, Nicholas D. Lane, Xin Liu 0002, Thomas Moscibroda |
IPSN | 2 |
| 2014 | The power of online learning in stochastic network optimizationabstractIn this paper, we investigate the power of online learning in stochastic network optimization with unknown system statistics a priori. We are interested in understanding how information and learning can be efficiently incorporated into system control techniques, and what are the fundamental benefits of doing so. We propose two Online Learning-Aided Control techniques, OLAC and OLAC2, that explicitly utilize the past system information in current system control via a learning procedure called dual learning. We prove strong performance guarantees of the proposed algorithms: OLAC and OLAC2 achieve the near-optimal [O(ε), O([log(1/ε)]2)] utility-delay tradeoff and OLAC2 possesses an O(ε-2/3) convergence time. Simulation results also confirm the superior performance of the proposed algorithms in practice. To the best of our knowledge, OLAC and OLAC2 are the first algorithms that simultaneously possess explicit near-optimal delay guarantee and sub-linear convergence time, and our attempt is the first to explicitly incorporate online learning into stochastic network optimization and to demonstrate its power in both theory and practice. Longbo Huang, Xin Liu 0002, Xiaohong Hao |
SIGMETRICS | 3 |
| 2014 | Monitoring massive appliances by a minimal number of smart metersabstractThis article presents a framework for deploying a minimal number of smart meters to accurately track the ON/OFF states of a massive number of electrical appliances which exploits the sparseness feature of simultaneous ON/OFF switching events of the massive appliances. A theoretical bound on the least number of required smart meters is studied by an entropy-based approach, which qualifies the impact of meter deployment strategies to the state tracking accuracy. It motivates a meter deployment optimization algorithm (MDOP) to minimize the number of meters while satisfying given requirements to state tracking accuracy. To accurately decode the real-time ON/OFF states of appliances by the readings of meters, a fast state decoding (FSD) algorithm based on the hidden Markov model (HMM) is presented to track the state sequence of each appliance for better accuracy. Although traditional HMM needs O ( t 2 2 N ) time complexity to conduct online sequence decoding, FSD improves the complexity to O ( tn U+1 ), where n < N and U is an upper bound of the simultaneous switching events. Both MDOP and FSD are verified extensively using simulations and real PowerNet data. The results show that the meter deployment cost can be saved by more than 80% while still getting over 90% state tracking accuracy. Yongcai Wang, Xiaohong Hao, Chenye Wu, Changjian Hu |
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. | 2 |
| 2013 | Multi-Objective Optimizations of Structural Parameter Determination for Serpentine Channel Heat Sink
Xuekang Li, Xiaohong Hao, Yi Chen 0020, Muhao Zhang, Bei Peng 0002 |
EvoApplications | 2 |
| 2011 | A volume first maxima-finding algorithm
Xiangquan Gui, Xiaohong Hao, Yuanping Zhang, Xuerong Yong |
Theor. Comput. Sci. | 2 |
| 2010 | Arbitrary Obstacles Constrained Full Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks
Haisheng Tan, Xiaohong Hao, Qiang-Sheng Hua, Francis C. M. Lau 0001 |
WASA | 3 |
| 2004 | OPC DX and industrial Ethernet glues fieldbus togetherabstractWith our hope of having one world standard for fieldbus being dashed to the ground, new technology of OPC data exchange (DX) and industrial Ethernet emerge, as the times require. The advantages of Ethernet, such as great bandwidth, resourceful hardware and software, potential of durative development and especially based on open IEEE Std 802.3, are porting the traditional fieldbus architectures to industrial Ethernet. Finding industrial Ethernet's proper place among the fieldbus and its limitation using Ethernet to the manufactory floor is analyzed in detail. OPC DX, defining a set of interfaces that can be used to remotely configure and manage the connections maintained by each OPC DX server, provides application interoperability between disparate fieldbuses. By analyzing an application example in process control using both industrial Ethernet and OPC DX in detail, this paper presents that OPC DX and industrial Ethernet would complement each other rather than replace, and they would exit in parallel for a long time. With the development of OPC DX and industrial Ethernet, they must bring an end to the dispute among fieldbus. Xiaohong Hao, Shunhong Hou |
ICARCV | 1 |