EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jing Lu 0003
dblp:77/1751-3
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Embedded and real-time systems · 33% Memory systems · 33% Parallel and multicore computing · 33% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems › embedded software › embedded operating systems › embedded memory management
scratchpad memory management |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | SSDM: smart stack data management for software managed multicores (SMMs) · DAC 2013 |
Memory systems › memory management
stack data management |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | SSDM: smart stack data management for software managed multicores (SMMs) · DAC 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
integer linear programming · 0.2heuristic · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Efficient Code Assignment Techniques for Local Memory on Software Managed MulticoresabstractScaling the memory hierarchy is a major challenge when we scale the number of cores in a multicore processor. Software Managed Multicore (SMM) architectures come up as one of the promising solutions. In an SMM architecture, there are no caches, and each core has only a local scratchpad memory [Banakar et al. 2002]. As the local memory usually is small, large applications cannot be directly executed on it. Code and data of the task mapped to each core need to be managed between global memory and local memory. This article solves the problem of efficiently managing code on an SMM architecture. The primary requirement of generating efficient code assignments is a correct management cost model. In this article, we address this problem by proposing a cost calculation graph. In addition, we develop two heuristics CMSM (Code Mapping for Software Managed multicores) and CMSM_advanced that result in efficient code management execution on the local scratchpad memory. Experimental results collected after executing applications from the MiBench suite [Guthaus et al. 2001] demonstrate that merely by adopting the correct management cost calculation, even using previous code assignment schemes, we can improve performance by an average of 12%. Combining the correct management cost model and a more optimized code mapping algorithm together, our heuristics can reduce runtime in more than 80% of the cases, and by up to 20% on our set of benchmarks, compared to the state-of-the-art code assignment approach [Jung et al. 2010]. When compared with Instruction-level Parallelism (ILP) results, CMSM_advanced performs an average of 5% worse. We also simulate the benchmarks on a cache-based system, and find that the code management overhead on SMM core with our code management is much less than memory latency of a cache-based system. Jing Lu 0003, Ke Bai 0002, Aviral Shrivastava |
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. | 1 |
| 2013 | SSDM: smart stack data management for software managed multicores (SMMs)abstractSoftware Managed Multicore (SMM) architectures have been proposed as a solution for scaling the memory architecture. In an SMM architecture, there are no caches, and each core has only a local scratchpad memory. If all the code and data of the task to be executed on an SMM core cannot fit on the local memory, then data must be managed explicitly in the program through DMA instructions. While all code and data need to be managed, an efficient technique to manage stack data is of utmost importance since an average of 64% of all accesses may be to stack variables [16]. In this paper, we formulate the problem of stack data management optimization on an SMM core. We then develop both an ILP and a heuristic - SSDM (Smart Stack Data Management) to find out where to insert stack data management calls in the program. Experimental results demonstrate SSDM can reduce the overhead by 13X over the state-of-the-art stack data management technique [10]. Jing Lu 0003, Ke Bai 0002, Aviral Shrivastava |
DAC | 1 |