Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gennaro Monteleone

dblp:77/2506 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1989
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Programming languages and type systems
lambda calculus
0.011989
Generalized Conjunctive Types · POPL 1989
Programming languages and type systems › type systems › subtyping
subtype relation
0.011989
Generalized Conjunctive Types · POPL 1989
Programming languages and type systems
type theory
0.011989
Generalized Conjunctive Types · POPL 1989
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics › formal semantics
denotational semantics
0.011989
Generalized Conjunctive Types · POPL 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scott's semantics · 0.0information system models · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1989 Generalized Conjunctive Types
abstract
The definitions of Conjunctive types and their subtype relation, as introduced by Coppo-Dezani, are extended to consider the conjunction as a partial mapping from pairs of types to types, and the subtype relation as a relation between finite sets of types and types. These extensions basically mean that only conjunctions of compatible types are allowed and that the subtype relation is more like, so to speak, the implication in propositional logic. We show that the basic properties of the typing system with conjunctive types are still true. The terms that have a type are exactly the terms that are convertible to a head normal form and it is possible to characterize the terms with normal form by means of the types that are derivable for them in the system. Furthermore, the type assignment defines the interpretation of terms in a very general class of models of the λ-calculus: the models that are based on an information system, as defined by Scott.
Gennaro Monteleone
POPL1