Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dana Vantrease
dblp:77/3373
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Memory systems · 40% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 40% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 16% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › optical interconnection networks
nanophotonic interconnect |
0.2 | 2 | 2009 | Light speed arbitration and flow control for nanophotonic interconnects · MICRO 2009 Corona: System Implications of Emerging Nanophotonic Technology · ISCA 2008 |
Memory systems
cache coherence |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Atomic Coherence: Leveraging nanophotonics to build race-free cache coherence protocols · HPCA 2011 |
Memory systems › cache coherence
cache coherence protocol |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Atomic Coherence: Leveraging nanophotonics to build race-free cache coherence protocols · HPCA 2011 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
many-core architecture |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Corona: System Implications of Emerging Nanophotonic Technology · ISCA 2008 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
multicore design |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Light speed arbitration and flow control for nanophotonic interconnects · MICRO 2009 |
Energy-efficient computing › energy-efficient communication
interconnect energy |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Corona: System Implications of Emerging Nanophotonic Technology · ISCA 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optical mutex · 0.1nanophotonics · 0.1simulation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Atomic Coherence: Leveraging nanophotonics to build race-free cache coherence protocolsabstractThis paper advocates Atomic Coherence, a framework that simplifies cache coherence protocol specification, design, and verification by decoupling races from the protocol's operation. Atomic Coherence requires conflicting coherence requests to the same addresses be serialized with a mutex before they are issued. Once issued, requests follow a predictable race-free path. Because requests are guaranteed not to race, coherence protocols are simpler and protocol extensions are straightforward. Our implementation of Atomic Coherence uses optical mutexes because optics provides very low latency. We begin with a state-of-the-art non-atomic MOEFSI protocol and demonstrate that an atomic implementation is much simpler while imposing less than a 2% performance penalty. We then show how, in the absence of races, it is easy to add support for speculative coherence and improve performance by up to 70%. Similar performance gains may be possible in a non-atomic protocol, but not without considerable effort in race management. Dana Vantrease, Mikko H. Lipasti, Nathan L. Binkert |
HPCA | 1 |
| 2009 | Light speed arbitration and flow control for nanophotonic interconnectsabstractBy providing high bandwidth chip-wide communication at low latency and low power, on-chip optics can improve many-core performance dramatically. Optical channels that connect many nodes and allow for single cycle cache-line transmissions will require fast, high bandwidth arbitration. Dana Vantrease, Nathan L. Binkert, Robert Schreiber, Mikko H. Lipasti |
MICRO | 1 |
| 2008 | Corona: System Implications of Emerging Nanophotonic TechnologyabstractWe expect that many-core microprocessors will push performance per chip from the 10 gigaflop to the 10 teraflop range in the coming decade. To support this increased performance, memory and inter-core bandwidths will also have to scale by orders of magnitude. Pin limitations, the energy cost of electrical signaling, and the non-scalability of chip-length global wires are significant bandwidth impediments. Recent developments in silicon nanophotonic technology have the potential to meet these off- and on-stack bandwidth requirements at acceptable power levels. Corona is a 3 D many-core architecture that uses nanophotonic communication for both inter-core communication and off-stack communication to memory or I/O devices. Its peak floating-point performance is 10 teraflops. Dense wavelength division multiplexed optically connected memory modules provide 10 terabyte per second memory bandwidth. A photonic crossbar fully interconnects its 256 low-power multithreaded cores at 20 terabyte per second bandwidth. We have simulated a 1024 thread Corona system running synthetic benchmarks and scaled versions of the SPLASH-2 benchmark suite. We believe that in comparison with an electrically-connected many-core alternative that uses the same on-stack interconnect power, Corona can provide 2 to 6 times more performance on many memory intensive workloads, while simultaneously reducing power. Dana Vantrease, Robert Schreiber, Matteo Monchiero, Moray McLaren, Norman P. Jouppi, Marco Fiorentino, Al Davis, Nathan L. Binkert, Raymond G. Beausoleil, Jung Ho Ahn |
ISCA | 1 |