Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Avinash V. Varadarajan
dblp:77/3611
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2023 Regression with Label Differential Privacy · ICLR 2023 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › relaxed differential privacy
label differential privacy |
1.3 | 2 | 2023 | Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2023 Regression with Label Differential Privacy · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Regression with Label Differential Privacy · ICLR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
label randomization · 1.3label differential privacy · 1.3bias-variance trade-off · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Summary Reports Optimization in the Privacy Sandbox Attribution Reporting APIabstractThe Privacy Sandbox Attribution Reporting API has been recently deployed by Google Chrome to support the basic advertising functionality of attribution reporting (aka conversion measurement) after deprecation of third-party cookies. The API implements a collection of privacy-enhancing guardrails including contribution bounding and noise injection. It also offers flexibility for the analyst to allocate the contribution budget. In this work, we present algorithms for optimizing the allocation of the contribution budget for summary reports from the Attribution Reporting API. We develop a synthetic data model that we find to accurately capture real-world conversion data, and extensively evaluate our method on two real-world datasets and two synthetic datasets. We show that optimizing the parameters that can be set by the analyst can significantly improve the utility achieved by querying the API while satisfying the same privacy bounds. Hidayet Aksu, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar 0001, Pasin Manurangsi, Adam Sealfon, Avinash V. Varadarajan |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 7 |
| 2023 | Regression with Label Differential Privacy
Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ethan Leeman, Pasin Manurangsi, Avinash V. Varadarajan, Chiyuan Zhang |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2023 | Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential PrivacyabstractWe propose a new family of label randomizers for training _regression_ models under the constraint of label differential privacy (DP). In particular, we leverage the trade-offs between bias and variance to construct better label randomizers depending on a privately estimated prior distribution over the labels. We demonstrate that these randomizers achieve state-of-the-art privacy-utility trade-offs on several datasets, highlighting the importance of reducing bias when training neural networks with label DP. We also provide theoretical results shedding light on the structural properties of the optimal unbiased randomizers. Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ethan Leeman, Pasin Manurangsi, Avinash V. Varadarajan, Chiyuan Zhang |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2020 | Scientific Discovery by Generating Counterfactuals Using Image Translation
Arunachalam Narayanaswamy, Subhashini Venugopalan, Dale R. Webster, Lily Peng, Gregory S. Corrado, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Pinal Bavishi, Michael P. Brenner, Philip C. Nelson, Avinash V. Varadarajan |
MICCAI (1) | 10 |
| 2007 | Data structures for limited oblivious execution of programs while preserving locality of referenceabstractWe introduce a data structure for program execution under a limited oblivious execution model. For fully oblivious execution along the lines of Goldreich and Ostrovsky [2], one transforms a given program into a one that has totally random looking execution, based on some cryptographic assumptions and the existence of secure hardware. Totally random memory access patterns do not respect the locality of reference in programs to which the programs generally owe their efficiency. We propose a model that limits the obliviousness so as to enable efficient execution of the program; here the adversary marks a variable and tries to produce a list of candidate locations where it may be stored in after $T$-steps ofexecution. We propose a randomized algorithm based on splay trees,and prove a lower bound on such lists. Avinash V. Varadarajan, Ramarathnam Venkatesan, C. Pandu Rangan |
Digital Rights Management Workshop | 1 |