Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Avinash V. Varadarajan

dblp:77/3611 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
1.322023
Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2023
Regression with Label Differential Privacy · ICLR 2023
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › relaxed differential privacy
label differential privacy
1.322023
Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacy · NeurIPS 2023
Regression with Label Differential Privacy · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
regression
0.712023
Regression with Label Differential Privacy · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

label randomization · 1.3label differential privacy · 1.3bias-variance trade-off · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Summary Reports Optimization in the Privacy Sandbox Attribution Reporting API
abstract
The Privacy Sandbox Attribution Reporting API has been recently deployed by Google Chrome to support the basic advertising functionality of attribution reporting (aka conversion measurement) after deprecation of third-party cookies. The API implements a collection of privacy-enhancing guardrails including contribution bounding and noise injection. It also offers flexibility for the analyst to allocate the contribution budget. In this work, we present algorithms for optimizing the allocation of the contribution budget for summary reports from the Attribution Reporting API. We develop a synthetic data model that we find to accurately capture real-world conversion data, and extensively evaluate our method on two real-world datasets and two synthetic datasets. We show that optimizing the parameters that can be set by the analyst can significantly improve the utility achieved by querying the API while satisfying the same privacy bounds.
Hidayet Aksu, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar 0001, Pasin Manurangsi, Adam Sealfon, Avinash V. Varadarajan
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.7
2023 Regression with Label Differential Privacy
Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ethan Leeman, Pasin Manurangsi, Avinash V. Varadarajan, Chiyuan Zhang
ICLR6
2023 Optimal Unbiased Randomizers for Regression with Label Differential Privacy
abstract
We propose a new family of label randomizers for training _regression_ models under the constraint of label differential privacy (DP). In particular, we leverage the trade-offs between bias and variance to construct better label randomizers depending on a privately estimated prior distribution over the labels. We demonstrate that these randomizers achieve state-of-the-art privacy-utility trade-offs on several datasets, highlighting the importance of reducing bias when training neural networks with label DP. We also provide theoretical results shedding light on the structural properties of the optimal unbiased randomizers.
Ashwinkumar Badanidiyuru, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar 0001, Ethan Leeman, Pasin Manurangsi, Avinash V. Varadarajan, Chiyuan Zhang
NeurIPS7
2020 Scientific Discovery by Generating Counterfactuals Using Image Translation
Arunachalam Narayanaswamy, Subhashini Venugopalan, Dale R. Webster, Lily Peng, Gregory S. Corrado, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Pinal Bavishi, Michael P. Brenner, Philip C. Nelson, Avinash V. Varadarajan
MICCAI (1)10
2007 Data structures for limited oblivious execution of programs while preserving locality of reference
abstract
We introduce a data structure for program execution under a limited oblivious execution model. For fully oblivious execution along the lines of Goldreich and Ostrovsky [2], one transforms a given program into a one that has totally random looking execution, based on some cryptographic assumptions and the existence of secure hardware. Totally random memory access patterns do not respect the locality of reference in programs to which the programs generally owe their efficiency. We propose a model that limits the obliviousness so as to enable efficient execution of the program; here the adversary marks a variable and tries to produce a list of candidate locations where it may be stored in after $T$-steps ofexecution. We propose a randomized algorithm based on splay trees,and prove a lower bound on such lists.
Avinash V. Varadarajan, Ramarathnam Venkatesan, C. Pandu Rangan
Digital Rights Management Workshop1