Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fen-Ly Lo
dblp:77/3802
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
computer-mediated collaboration |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Where did we turn wrong?: unpacking the effect of culture and technology on attributions of team performance · CSCW 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
laboratory study · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Where did we turn wrong?: unpacking the effect of culture and technology on attributions of team performanceabstractComputer-mediated collaboration is becoming an increasingly prevalent form of work ([22]). At the same time, organizations are relying more and more on culturally diverse teams to staff knowledge-intensive projects (e.g., software development, customer service, corporate training,). We conducted a laboratory study examining the role of collaborative technologies and culture on 2-person team members' attributions of causes for their collaborative performance. Pairs of American, Chinese, and intercultural American-Chinese students collaborated on two map navigation tasks using one of three technologies: video, audio, or IM. As predicted, culture and technology interacted to affect the extent to which members attributed performance to dispositional factors (e.g., personality or mood) vs. situational factors (e.g., the technology or task difficulty). We discuss the implications of our results for E. Ilana Diamant, Susan R. Fussell, Fen-Ly Lo |
CSCW | 3 |