Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yasuharu Nishi

dblp:77/543 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data integration and cleaning › data quality
data quality assessment
0.512021
2nd International Workshop on Data Quality Assessment for Machine Learning · KDD 2021
Data integration and cleaning
data quality
0.112021
2nd International Workshop on Data Quality Assessment for Machine Learning · KDD 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 2nd International Workshop on Data Quality Assessment for Machine Learning
abstract
The 2nd International Workshop on Data Quality Assessment for Machine Learning (DQAML'21) is organized in conjunction with the Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD). This workshop aims to serve as a forum for the presentation of research related to data quality assessment and remediation in AI/ML pipeline. Data quality is a critical issue in the data preparation phase and involves numerous challenging problems related to detection, remediation, visualization and evaluation of data issues. The workshop aims to provide a platform to researchers and practitioners to discuss such challenges across different modalities of data like structured, time series, text and graphical. The aim is to attract perspectives from both industrial and academic circles.
Hima Patel, Fuyuki Ishikawa, Laure Berti-Équille, Nitin Gupta 0005, Sameep Mehta, Satoshi Masuda, Shashank Mujumdar, Shazia Afzal, Srikanta J. Bedathur, Yasuharu Nishi
KDD10
2020 Guidelines for Quality Assurance of Machine Learning-based Artificial Intelligence
Koichi Hamada, Fuyuki Ishikawa, Satoshi Masuda, Tomoyuki Myojin, Yasuharu Nishi, Hideto Ogawa, Takahiro Toku, Susumu Tokumoto, Kazunori Tsuchiya, Yasuhiro Ujita, Mineo Matsuya
SEKE5
2020 Guidelines for Quality Assurance of Machine Learning-Based Artificial Intelligence
abstract
Significant effort is being put into developing industrial applications for artificial intelligence (AI), especially those using machine learning (ML) techniques. Despite the intensive support for building ML applications, there are still challenges when it comes to evaluating, assuring, and improving the quality or dependability. The difficulty stems from the unique nature of ML, namely, system behavior is derived from training data not from logical design by human engineers. This leads to black-box and intrinsically imperfect implementations that invalidate many principles and techniques in traditional software engineering. In light of this situation, the Japanese industry has jointly worked on a set of guidelines for the quality assurance of AI systems (in the Consortium of Quality Assurance for AI-based Products and Services) from the viewpoint of traditional quality-assurance engineers and test engineers. We report on the second version of these guidelines, which cover a list of quality evaluation aspects, catalogue of current state-of-the-art techniques, and domain-specific discussions in five representative domains. The guidelines provide significant insights for engineers in terms of methodologies and designs for tests driven by application-specific requirements.
Gaku Fujii, Koichi Hamada, Fuyuki Ishikawa, Satoshi Masuda, Mineo Matsuya, Tomoyuki Myojin, Yasuharu Nishi, Hideto Ogawa, Takahiro Toku, Susumu Tokumoto, Kazunori Tsuchiya, Yasuhiro Ujita
Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng.7