Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
L. Rosenthaler
dblp:77/5442
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological database
molecular biology databases |
0.0 | 1 | 1994 | Simplified user poll and experience report language (SUPER): implementation and application · Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1994 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
automated tabulation · 0.0branching questionnaire design · 0.0branching questionnaire · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1994 | Simplified user poll and experience report language (SUPER): implementation and applicationabstractBiological computing is generally organized as stand-alone implementation on a PC-type computer or on a central facility (e.g. a university computer center). Services provided by central facilities need to be tailored to the user community. Unless very work-intensive individual contacts are used, the feedback must be collected with generalized tools, such as questionnaires distributed in the form of a newsletter. We have developed a method to have such polls automated and tailored, as well as having multiple-choice questions combined with branching after fundamental questions. As the evaluation of the results needs to know the questions asked, we have also included a method to process the answers and give detailed tables on the answers. SUPER was applied in a poll to query the academic usership in Switzerland on the usage of molecular biology databases. L. Rosenthaler, Reinhard Dölz |
Comput. Appl. Biosci. | 1 |
| 1994 | Simplified user poll and experience report language (SUPER): implementation and applicationabstractBiological computing is generally organized as standalone implementation on a PC-type computer or on a central facility (e.g. a university computer center). Services provided by central facilities need to be tailored to the user community. Unless very work-intensive individual contacts are used, the feedback must be collected with generalized tools, such as questionnaires distributed in the form of a newsletter. We have developed a method to have such polls automated and tailored, as well as having multiple-choice questions combined with branching after fundamental questions. As the evaluation of the results needs to know the questions asked, we have also included a method to process the answers and give detailed tables on the answers. SUPER was applied in a poll to query the academic usership in Switzerland on the usage of molecular biology databases. L. Rosenthaler, Reinhard Dölz, L. Tosoni |
Comput. Appl. Biosci. | 1 |