Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James W. Layland

dblp:77/6190 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1974
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Embedded and real-time systems · 94% Storage systems · 6%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
sequential decoding
0.011974
Buffer Management for Sequential Decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › priority scheduling
dynamic priority scheduling
0.011973
Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment · J. ACM 1973
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › deadline scheduling
EDF scheduling
0.011973
Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment · J. ACM 1973
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling
fixed-priority scheduling
0.011973
Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment · J. ACM 1973
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time scheduling › fixed-priority scheduling
rate-monotonic scheduling
0.011973
Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment · J. ACM 1973
Embedded and real-time systems
real-time scheduling
0.011973
Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment · J. ACM 1973
Storage systems
buffer management
0.011974
Buffer Management for Sequential Decoding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

time-sharing analogy · 0.0buffer-management strategy · 0.0utilization bound analysis · 0.0schedulability analysis · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1974 Buffer Management for Sequential Decoding
abstract
Sequential decoding has been found to be an efficient means of communicating at low undetected error rates from deep space probes, but another failure mechanism known as erasure or computational overflow remains a significant problem. The erasure of a block occurs when the decoder has not finished decoding that block at the time that it must be output. The erasure rate can be unacceptably high even when the decoder is spending over half of its time idly awaiting incoming data. By drawing upon analogies in computer time sharing, this concise paper develops a buffer-management strategy which reduces the decoder idle time to a negligible level, and therefore improves the erasure probability of a sequential decoder. For a decoder with a speed advantage of ten and a buffer size of ten blocks, operating at an erasure rate of 10-2, use of this buffer-management strategy reduces the erasure rate to less than 10-4.
James W. Layland
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
1973 Scheduling Algorithms for Multiprogramming in a Hard-Real-Time Environment
abstract
The problem of multiprogram scheduling on a single processor is studied from the viewpoint of the characteristics peculiar to the program functions that need guaranteed service. It is shown that an optimum fixed priority scheduler possesses an upper bound to processor utilization which may be as low as 70 percent for large task sets. It is also shown that full processor utilization can be achieved by dynamically assigning priorities on the basis of their current deadlines. A combination of these two scheduling techniques is also discussed.
C. L. Liu 0001, James W. Layland
J. ACM2