Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Richard Altendorfer
dblp:77/6421
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-2884-8444ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 48% Autonomous driving · 48% Legged, aerial and field robots · 3% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection · ECCV (60) 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › point cloud object detection
LiDAR-based 3D object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection · ECCV (60) 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection · ECCV (60) 2024 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › radar perception
radar object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection · ECCV (60) 2024 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Towards a Factored Analysis of Legged Locomotion Models · ICRA 2003 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
spring-loaded inverted pendulum |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Towards a Factored Analysis of Legged Locomotion Models · ICRA 2003 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
stability analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Towards a Factored Analysis of Legged Locomotion Models · ICRA 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
return map factorization · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | LEROjD: Lidar Extended Radar-Only Object Detection
Patrick Palmer, Martin Krüger, Stefan Schütte, Richard Altendorfer, Ganesh Adam, Torsten Bertram |
ECCV (60) | 4 |
| 2016 | Why the association log-likelihood distance should be used for measurement-to-track associationabstractThe Mahalanobis distance is commonly used in multi-object trackers for measurement-to-track association. Starting with the original definition of the Mahalanobis distance we review its use in association. Given that there is no principle in multi-object tracking that sets the Mahalanobis distance apart as a distinguished statistical distance we revisit the global association hypotheses of multiple hypothesis tracking as the most general association setting. Those association hypotheses induce a distance-like quantity for assignment which we refer to as association log-likelihood distance. We compare the ability of the Mahalanobis distance to the association log-likelihood distance to yield correct association relations in Monte-Carlo simulations. Here, we use a novel method to generate multi-track scenarios that make the association evaluation independent of a specific track management scheme. We also explore the influence of the term proportional to the measurement dimension in the association log-likelihood distance on the assignment performance. It turns out that on average the distance based on association log-likelihood performs better than the Mahalanobis distance, confirming that the maximization of global association hypotheses is a more fundamental approach to association than the minimization of a certain statistical distance measure. Richard Altendorfer, Sebastian J. Wirkert |
Intelligent Vehicles Symposium | 1 |
| 2014 | Path assignment techniques for vehicle trackingabstractMany driver assistance systems such as Adaptive Cruise Control require the identification of the closest vehicle that is in the host vehicle's path. This entails an assignment of detected vehicles to the host vehicle path or neighboring paths. After reviewing approaches to the estimation of the host vehicle path and lane assignment techniques we introduce two methods that are motivated by the rationale to filter measured data as late in the processing stages as possible in order to avoid delays and other artifacts of intermediate filters. These filters generate discrete posterior probability distributions from which a path or “lane” index is extracted by a median estimator. The relative performance of those methods is illustrated by a ROC using experimental data and labeled ground truth data. Richard Altendorfer, Sebastian J. Wirkert |
Intelligent Vehicles Symposium | 1 |
| 2010 | A confidence measure for vehicle tracking based on a generalization of Bayes estimationabstractIn safety-critical driver assistance systems such as automatic emergency braking that require the estimation of the vehicle's environment usually a measure of confidence or probability of existence for tracked objects is required. We review and assess existing approaches of obtaining such measures. We propose a new method of computing a probability of existence by relaxing the underlying assumption of a Bayes estimator. The benefits of this approach compared to a standard Bayes estimator are demonstrated and illustrated by experimental results. Richard Altendorfer, Stephan Matzka |
Intelligent Vehicles Symposium | 1 |
| 2003 | Towards a Factored Analysis of Legged Locomotion ModelsabstractIn this paper, we report on a new stability analysis for hybrid legged locomotion systems based on factorization of return maps. We apply this analysis to a family of models of the spring loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP) with different leg recirculation strategies. We obtain a necessary condition for the asymptotic stability of those models, which is formulated as an exact algebraic expression despite the non-integrability of the SLIP dynamics. We outline the application of this analysis of other models of legged locomotion and it importance for the stability of legged robots and animals. Richard Altendorfer, Daniel E. Koditschek, Philip Holmes |
ICRA | 1 |