Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jean-Louis Lassez

dblp:77/6488 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
30ranked-venue papers
18as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 14 · 8 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 6 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 6 · 3 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 5 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
7 papers
Logic in computer science · 69% Mathematical optimization · 11% Computational complexity · 11%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Spatial and temporal data management · 80% Data models and query languages · 20%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Spatial and temporal data management
spatial indexing
0.011995
Separability of Polyhedra for Optimal Filtering of Spatial and Constraint Data · PODS 1995
Logic in computer science
logic programming
0.031990
A Constraint Sequent Calculus · LICS 1990
The Denotational Semantics of Horn Clauses as a Production System · AAAI 1983
Querying Constraints · PODS 1990
Data models and query languages › constraint databases
constraint query languages
0.011990
Querying Constraints · PODS 1990
Computational complexity › constraint satisfaction
constraint propagation
0.011990
A Constraint Sequent Calculus · LICS 1990
Mathematical optimization
linear inequalities
0.011990
Querying Constraints · PODS 1990
Logic in computer science
proof theory
0.011990
A Constraint Sequent Calculus · LICS 1990
Logic in computer science › proof theory
sequent calculus
0.011990
A Constraint Sequent Calculus · LICS 1990
Programming languages and type systems › logic programming
constraint logic programming
0.011987
Constraint Logic Programming · POPL 1987
Programming languages and type systems
logic programming
0.011987
Constraint Logic Programming · POPL 1987
Logic in computer science
formal semantics
0.011987
Constraint Logic Programming · POPL 1987
Logic in computer science
completeness
0.011983
Completeness of the Negation as Failure Rule · IJCAI 1983
Logic in computer science › semantics
denotational semantics
0.011983
The Denotational Semantics of Horn Clauses as a Production System · AAAI 1983
Logic in computer science › logic programming
horn clauses
0.011983
The Denotational Semantics of Horn Clauses as a Production System · AAAI 1983
Logic in computer science › logic programming
negation as failure
0.011983
Completeness of the Negation as Failure Rule · IJCAI 1983
Logic in computer science
semantics
0.011983
The Denotational Semantics of Horn Clauses as a Production System · AAAI 1983
Coding theory › source coding › variable-length codes
prefix codes
0.011975
A correspondence on strongly prefix codes (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1975
Coding theory
source coding
0.011975
A correspondence on strongly prefix codes (Corresp.) · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1975

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

convex polyhedron approximation · 0.0axis selection optimization · 0.0symbolic computation · 0.0linear programming · 0.0computational geometry · 0.0constraint solving · 0.0completeness theorem · 0.0canonical form · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2008 Ranking Links on the Web: Search and Surf Engines
Jean-Louis Lassez, Ryan Rossi, Kumar Jeev
IEA/AIE1
2008 Signature based intrusion detection using latent semantic analysis
abstract
We address the problem of selecting and extracting key features by using singular value decomposition and latent semantic analysis. As a consequence, we are able to discover latent information which allows us to design signatures for forensics and in a dual approach for real-time intrusion detection systems. The validity of this method is shown by using several automated classification algorithms (Maxim, SYM, LGP). Using the original data set we classify 99.86% of the calls correctly. After feature extraction we classify 99.68% of the calls correctly, while with feature selection we classify 99.78% of the calls correctly, justifying the use of these techniques in forensics. The signatures obtained after feature selection and extraction using LSA allow us to class 95.69% of the calls correctly with features that can be computed in real time. We use Support Vector Decision Function and Linear Genetic Programming for feature selection on a real data set generated on a live performance network that consists of probe and denial of service attacks. We find that the results reinforce our feature selection method.
Jean-Louis Lassez, Ryan Rossi, Stephen J. Sheel, Srinivas Mukkamala
IJCNN1
2006 Zoomed Clusters
Jean-Louis Lassez, Tayfun Karadeniz, Srinivas Mukkamala
ICONIP (2)1
2003 Similarity Based Classification
Axel E. Bernal, Karen Hospevian, Tayfun Karadeniz, Jean-Louis Lassez
IDA4
1999 Separability of Polyhedra for Optimal Filtering of Spatial and Constraint Data
Alexander Brodsky 0001, Catherine Lassez, Jean-Louis Lassez, Michael J. Maher
J. Autom. Reason.3
1995 Separability of Polyhedra for Optimal Filtering of Spatial and Constraint Data
abstract
The filtering method considered in this paper is based on approximation of a spatial object in d-dimensional space by the minimal convex polyhedron that encloses the object and whose facets are normal to preselected axes. These axes are not necessarily the standard coordinate axes and, furthermore, their number is not determined by the dimension of the space. We optimize filtering by selecting optimal such axes based on a pre-processing analysis of stored objects or a sample thereof. The number of axes selected represents a trade-off between access time and storage overhead, as more axes usually lead to better filtering but require more overhead to store the associated access structures. We address the problem of minimizing the number of axes required to achieve a predefined quality of filtering and the reverse problem of optimizing the quality of filtering when the number of axes is fixed. In both cases we also show how to find an optimal collection of axes. In order to sol...
Alexander Brodsky 0001, Catherine Lassez, Jean-Louis Lassez, Michael J. Maher
PODS3
1992 On Fourier's Algorithm for Linear Arithmetic Constraints
Jean-Louis Lassez, Michael J. Maher
J. Autom. Reason.1
1992 A Canonical Form for Generalized Linear Constraints
Jean-Louis Lassez, Kenneth McAloon
J. Symb. Comput.1
1991 Elimination of Negation in Term Algebras
Jean-Louis Lassez, Michael J. Maher, Kim Marriott
MFCS1
1991 Practical tools for reasoning about linear constraints
Tien Huynh, Leo Joskowicz, Catherine Lassez, Jean-Louis Lassez
Fundam. Informaticae4
1990 Reasoning About Linear Constraints Using Parametric Queries
Tien Huynh, Leo Joskowicz, Catherine Lassez, Jean-Louis Lassez
FSTTCS4
1990 A Constraint Sequent Calculus
abstract
An axiomatic approach that accounts for examples that come up in logic programming, symbolic computation, affine geometry, and elsewhere is presented. It is shown that if disjunction behaves in an intuitionistic fashion, notions of canonical form for positive constraints can be systematically extended to include negative constraints. As a consequence, completeness theorems involving positive and negative constraints can be proven in a general setting for constraint propagation.>
Jean-Louis Lassez, Kenneth McAloon
LICS1
1990 Querying Constraints
abstract
The design of languages to tackle constraint satisfaction problems has a long history. Only more recently the reverse problem of introducing constraints as primitive constructs in programming languages has been addressed. A main task that the designers and implementers of such languages face is to use and adapt the concepts and algorithms from the extensive studies on constraints done in areas such as Mathematical Programming, Symbolic Computation, Artificial Intelligence, Program Verification and Computational Geometry. In this paper, we illustrate this task in a simple and yet important domain: linear arithmetic constraints. We show how one can design a querying system for sets of linear constraints by using basic concepts from logic programming and symbolic computation, as well as algorithms from linear programming and computational geometry. We conclude by reporting briefly on how notions of negation and canonical representation used in linear constraints can be generalized to account for cases in term algebras, symbolic computation, affine geometry, and elsewhere.
Jean-Louis Lassez
PODS1
1987 Constraint Logic Programming
abstract
We address the problem of designing programming systems to reason with and about constraints. Taking a logic programming approach, we define a class of programming languages, the CLP languages, all of which share the same essential semantic properties. From a conceptual point of view, CLP programs are highly declarative and are soundly based within a unified framework of formal semantics. This framework not only subsumes that of logic programming, but satisfies the core properties of logic programs more naturally. From a user's point of view, CLP programs have great expressive power due to the constraints which they naturally manipulate. Intuition in the reasoning about programs is enhanced as a result of working directly in the intended domain of discourse. This contrasts with working in the Herbrand Universe wherein every semantic object has to be explicitly coded into a Herbrand term; this enforces reasoning at a primitive level. Finally, from an implementor's point of view, CLP systems can be efficient because of the exploitation of constraint solving techniques over specific domains.
Joxan Jaffar, Jean-Louis Lassez
POPL2
1987 Explicit Representation of Terms Defined by Counter Examples
Jean-Louis Lassez, Kim Marriott
J. Autom. Reason.1
1986 Explicit Representation of Terms Defined by Counter Examples
Jean-Louis Lassez, Kim Marriott
FSTTCS1
1986 Invited Talk: Some Issues and Trends in the Semantics of Logic Programming
Joxan Jaffar, Jean-Louis Lassez, Michael J. Maher
ICLP2
1985 Optimal Fixedpoints of Logic Programs
Jean-Louis Lassez, Michael J. Maher
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1984 A Unified Treatment of Resolution Strategies for Logic Programs
David A. Wolfram, Michael J. Maher, Jean-Louis Lassez
ICLP3
1984 Closures and Fairness in the Semantics of Programming Logic
Jean-Louis Lassez, Michael J. Maher
Theor. Comput. Sci.1
1983 The Denotational Semantics of Horn Clauses as a Production System
Jean-Louis Lassez, Michael J. Maher
AAAI1
1983 Completeness of the Negation as Failure Rule
Joxan Jaffar, Jean-Louis Lassez, John W. Lloyd
IJCAI2
1982 Reasoning about Array Segments
Joxan Jaffar, Jean-Louis Lassez
ECAI2
1982 Fixed Point Theorems and Semantics: A Folk Tale
Jean-Louis Lassez, V. L. Nguyen, Liz Sonenberg
Inf. Process. Lett.1
1981 A critical examination of software science
Jean-Louis Lassez, Dirk van der Knijff, John Shepherd 0001, Catherine Lassez
J. Syst. Softw.1
1981 A Dual Problem to Least Fixed Points
V. L. Nguyen, Jean-Louis Lassez
Theor. Comput. Sci.2
1979 Evaluation of length and level for simple program schemes
abstract
Several examples of simple program schemes are used to study the influence of basic con structs on measures of Software Science. A min imal low level language is used in order to build examples which contain large numbers of the constructs under study. The measures are expressed as functions depending on the number of con ceptually unique input-output operands. They may therefore be evaluated and compared to their estimators analytically rather than statistically.
Jean-Louis Lassez, Dirk van der Knijff
COMPSAC1
1979 A Clarification of the Comparison Between Some Measures of Software Science
Dirk van der Knijff, Jean-Louis Lassez
Inf. Process. Lett.2
1975 Prefix codes, trees and automata
Jean-Louis Lassez
Inf. Sci.1
1975 A correspondence on strongly prefix codes (Corresp.)
abstract
We introduce an elementary family of prefix codes, which is closely related to many other families of prefix codes.
Jean-Louis Lassez
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1