Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stuart Geman

dblp:77/6895 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
17ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 22% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 11%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Coding theory · 47% Information theory · 28% Algorithms and data structures · 18%
Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 27, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling
hierarchical model
0.112011
Context, Computation, and Optimal ROC Performance in Hierarchical Models · Int. J. Comput. Vis. 2011
Information theory › information measures
entropy
0.112008
On the Minimum Entropy of a Mixture of Unimodal and Symmetric Distributions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2008
Coding theory
source coding
0.112008
On the Minimum Entropy of a Mixture of Unimodal and Symmetric Distributions · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2008
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
graphical models
0.122006
Context and Hierarchy in a Probabilistic Image Model · CVPR (2) 2006
Dynamic programming for parsing and estimation of stochastic unification-based grammars · ACL 2002
Algorithms and data structures
dynamic programming
0.122002
Dynamic programming for parsing and estimation of stochastic unification-based grammars · ACL 2002
Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › hierarchical modeling › hierarchical model
hierarchical image model
0.112006
Context and Hierarchy in a Probabilistic Image Model · CVPR (2) 2006
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding
decoding algorithms
0.012001
Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.012001
Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › decoding › decoding algorithms › optimal decoding
maximum-likelihood decoding
0.012001
Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2001
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
statistical language modeling
0.011999
Estimators for Stochastic "Unification-Based" Grammars · ACL 1999
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing
0.011999
Estimators for Stochastic "Unification-Based" Grammars · ACL 1999
Logic in computer science › meta-logic
consistency
0.011998
On the Consistency of Minimum Complexity Nonparametric Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1998
Information theory › estimation theory
nonparametric estimation
0.011998
On the Consistency of Minimum Complexity Nonparametric Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1998
Computer vision › Vision and language
compositionality
0.011996
Compositionality, MDL Priors, and Object Recognition · NIPS 1996
Machine learning › Learning theory › model selection
minimum description length
0.011996
Compositionality, MDL Priors, and Object Recognition · NIPS 1996
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.011996
Compositionality, MDL Priors, and Object Recognition · NIPS 1996
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
markov random field
0.021990
Boundary Detection by Constrained Optimization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1990
Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1984
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
MAP inference
0.011990
Boundary Detection by Constrained Optimization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1990
Image and video processing › image segmentation
contour detection
0.011990
Boundary Detection by Constrained Optimization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1990
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.011990
Boundary Detection by Constrained Optimization · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1990
Mathematical optimization
regularization
0.011998
On the Consistency of Minimum Complexity Nonparametric Estimation · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1998
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical physics
gibbs distribution
0.011984
Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1984
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.011984
Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1984

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

bayesian inference · 0.1ROC analysis · 0.1non-markovian perturbation · 0.1bayesian network · 0.1dynamic programming · 0.1mode alignment proof · 0.1packed parse representations · 0.1coarse-to-fine computation · 0.0maximum likelihood estimation · 0.0log-linear modeling · 0.0complexity-based priors · 0.0stochastic relaxation · 0.0minimum description length · 0.0kolmogorov-smirnov statistic · 0.0constrained optimization · 0.0simulated annealing · 0.0gibbs sampling · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Base-pair ambiguity and the kinetics of RNA folding
abstract
BACKGROUND: A pairings of nucleotide sequences. Given this forbidding free-energy landscape, mechanisms have evolved that contribute to a directed and efficient folding process, including catalytic proteins and error-detecting chaperones. Among structural RNA molecules we make a distinction between "bound" molecules, which are active as part of ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes, and "unbound," with physiological functions performed without necessarily being bound in RNP complexes. We hypothesized that unbound molecules, lacking the partnering structure of a protein, would be more vulnerable than bound molecules to kinetic traps that compete with native stem structures. We defined an "ambiguity index"-a normalized function of the primary and secondary structure of an individual molecule that measures the number of kinetic traps available to nucleotide sequences that are paired in the native structure, presuming that unbound molecules would have lower indexes. The ambiguity index depends on the purported secondary structure, and was computed under both the comparative ("gold standard") and an equilibrium-based prediction which approximates the minimum free energy (MFE) structure. Arguing that kinetically accessible metastable structures might be more biologically relevant than thermodynamic equilibrium structures, we also hypothesized that MFE-derived ambiguities would be less effective in separating bound and unbound molecules. RESULTS: We have introduced an intuitive and easily computed function of primary and secondary structures that measures the availability of complementary sequences that could disrupt the formation of native stems on a given molecule-an ambiguity index. Using comparative secondary structures, the ambiguity index is systematically smaller among unbound than bound molecules, as expected. Furthermore, the effect is lost when the presumably more accurate comparative structure is replaced instead by the MFE structure. CONCLUSIONS: A statistical analysis of the relationship between the primary and secondary structures of non-coding RNA molecules suggests that stem-disrupting kinetic traps are substantially less prevalent in molecules not participating in RNP complexes. In that this distinction is apparent under the comparative but not the MFE secondary structure, the results highlight a possible deficiency in structure predictions when based upon assumptions of thermodynamic equilibrium.
Jackson Loper, Stuart Geman
BMC Bioinform.3
2014 Sparse feature selection by information theory
abstract
Learning sparse structures in high dimensions defines a combinatorial selection problem of e.g. informative feature dimensions and a subsequent estimation task to determine adequate model parameters. The arguably simplest sparse inference problem requires estimating a sparse mean in high dimensions when most dimensions should be discarded [6]. We reduce sparse mean estimation to a pure selection problem by restricting the source to binary values that are contaminated with various noise models. The model selection principle of Approximation Set Coding [2], [3] is rigorously applied, and generalization capacity is used to evaluate different algorithms. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of generalization capacity compared to traditional model selection approaches. Sampling-based approximation yields insights into the behavior of algorithms in high dimensions at different noise levels.
Stuart Geman, Joachim M. Buhmann
ISIT2
2011 Context, Computation, and Optimal ROC Performance in Hierarchical Models
Lo-Bin Chang, Ya Jin, Wei Zhang 0062, Eran Borenstein, Stuart Geman
Int. J. Comput. Vis.5
2009 A Rate and History-Preserving Resampling Algorithm for Neural Spike Trains
abstract
Resampling methods are popular tools for exploring the statistical structure of neural spike trains. In many applications, it is desirable to have resamples that preserve certain non-Poisson properties, like refractory periods and bursting, and that are also robust to trial-to-trial variability. Pattern jitter is a resampling technique that accomplishes this by preserving the recent spiking history of all spikes and constraining resampled spikes to remain close to their original positions. The resampled spike times are maximally random up to these constraints. Dynamic programming is used to create an efficient resampling algorithm.
Matthew T. Harrison, Stuart Geman
Neural Comput.2
2008 On the Minimum Entropy of a Mixture of Unimodal and Symmetric Distributions
abstract
Progressive encoding of a signal generally involves an estimation step, designed to reduce the entropy of the residual of an observation over the entropy of the observation itself. Oftentimes the conditional distributions of an observation, given already-encoded observations, are well fit within a class of symmetric and unimodal distributions (e.g., the two-sided geometric distributions in images of natural scenes, or symmetric Paretian distributions in models of financial data). It is common practice to choose an estimator that centers, or aligns, the modes of the conditional distributions, since it is common sense that this will minimize the entropy, and hence the coding cost of the residuals. But with the exception of a special case, there has been no rigorous proof. Here we prove that the entropy of an arbitrary mixture of symmetric and unimodal distributions is minimized by aligning the modes. The result generalizes to unimodal and rotation-invariant distributions in Rn. We illustrate the result through some experiments with natural images.
Ting-Li Chen, Stuart Geman
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
2006 Context and Hierarchy in a Probabilistic Image Model
abstract
It is widely conjectured that the excellent ROC performance of biological vision systems is due in large part to the exploitation of context at each of many levels in a part/whole hierarchy. We propose a mathematical framework (a "composition machine") for constructing probabilistic hierarchical image models, designed to accommodate arbitrary contextual relationships, and we build a demonstration system for reading Massachusetts license plates in an image set collected at Logan Airport. The demonstration system detects and correctly reads more than 98% of the plates, with a negligible rate of false detection. Unlike a formal grammar, the architecture of a composition machine does not exclude the sharing of sub-parts among multiple entities, and does not limit interpretations to single trees (e.g. a scene can have multiple license plates, or no plates at all). In this sense, the architecture is more like a general Bayesian network than a formal grammar. On the other hand, unlike a Bayesian network, the distribution is non-Markovian, and therefore more like a probabilistic context-sensitive grammar. The conceptualization and construction of a composition machine is facilitated by its formulation as the result of a series of non-Markovian perturbations of a "Markov backbone."
Ya Jin, Stuart Geman
CVPR (2)2
2003 At what time scale does the nervous system operate?
N. Hatsopoulos, Stuart Geman, Asohan Amarasingham, Elie Bienenstock
Neurocomputing2
2002 Dynamic programming for parsing and estimation of stochastic unification-based grammars
abstract
Stochastic unification-based grammars (SUBGs) define exponential distributions over the parses generated by a unification-based grammar (UBG). Existing algorithms for parsing and estimation require the enumeration of all of the parses of a string in order to determine the most likely one, or in order to calculate the statistics needed to estimate a grammar from a training corpus. This paper describes a graph-based dynamic programming algorithm for calculating these statistics from the packed UBG parse representations of Maxwell and Kaplan (1995) which does not require enumerating all parses. Like many graphical algorithms, the dynamic programming algorithm's complexity is worst-case exponential, but is often polynomial. The key observation is that by using Maxwell and Kaplan packed representations, the required statistics can be rewritten as either the max or the sum of a product of functions. This is exactly the kind of problem which can be solved by dynamic programming over graphical models.
Stuart Geman
ACL1
2001 Dynamic programming and the graphical representation of error-correcting codes
abstract
Graphical representations of codes facilitate the design of computationally efficient decoding algorithms. This is an example of a general connection between dependency graphs, as arise in the representations of Markov random fields, and the dynamic programming principle. We concentrate on two computational tasks: finding the maximum-likelihood codeword and finding its posterior probability, given a signal received through a noisy channel. These two computations lend themselves to a particularly elegant version of dynamic programming, whereby the decoding complexity is particularly transparent. We explore some codes and some graphical representations designed specifically to facilitate computation. We further explore a coarse-to-fine version of dynamic programming that can produce an exact maximum-likelihood decoding many orders of magnitude faster than ordinary dynamic programming.
Stuart Geman, Kevin Kochanek
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
1999 Estimators for Stochastic "Unification-Based" Grammars
abstract
Log-linear models provide a statistically sound framework for Stochastic "Unification-Based" Grammars (SUBGs) and stochastic versions of other kinds of grammars. We describe two computationally-tractable ways of estimating the parameters of such grammars from a training corpus of syntactic analyses, and apply these to estimate a stochastic version of Lexical-Functional Grammar.
Mark Johnson 0001, Stuart Geman, Stephen Canon, Zhiyi Chi, Stefan Riezler
ACL2
1998 Estimation of Probabilistic Context-Free Grammars
Zhiyi Chi, Stuart Geman
Comput. Linguistics2
1998 On the Consistency of Minimum Complexity Nonparametric Estimation
abstract
Nonparametric estimation is usually inconsistent without some form of regularization. One way to impose regularity is through a prior measure. Barron and Cover (1991) have shown that complexity based prior measures can insure consistency, at least when restricted to countable dense subsets of the infinite-dimensional parameter (i.e., function) space. Strangely, however, these results are independent of the actual complexity assignment: the same results hold under an arbitrary permutation of the match-up of complexities to functions. We show that this phenomenon is related to the weakness of the convergence measures used. Stronger convergence can only be achieved through complexity measures that relate to the actual behavior of the functions.
Zhiyi Chi, Stuart Geman
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory2
1996 Compositionality, MDL Priors, and Object Recognition
Elie Bienenstock, Stuart Geman, Daniel Potter
NIPS2
1992 A nonlinear filter for film restoration and other problems in image processing
Stuart Geman, Donald E. McClure, Donald Geman
CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process.1
1992 Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
abstract
Feedforward neural networks trained by error backpropagation are examples of nonparametric regression estimators. We present a tutorial on nonparametric inference and its relation to neural networks, and we use the statistical viewpoint to highlight strengths and weaknesses of neural models. We illustrate the main points with some recognition experiments involving artificial data as well as handwritten numerals. In way of conclusion, we suggest that current-generation feedforward neural networks are largely inadequate for difficult problems in machine perception and machine learning, regardless of parallel-versus-serial hardware or other implementation issues. Furthermore, we suggest that the fundamental challenges in neural modeling are about representation rather than learning per se. This last point is supported by additional experiments with handwritten numerals.
Stuart Geman, Elie Bienenstock, René Doursat
Neural Comput.1
1990 Boundary Detection by Constrained Optimization
abstract
A statistical framework is used for finding boundaries and for partitioning scenes into homogeneous regions. The model is a joint probability distribution for the array of pixel gray levels and an array of labels. In boundary finding, the labels are binary, zero, or one, representing the absence or presence of boundary elements. In partitioning, the label values are generic: two labels are the same when the corresponding scene locations are considered to belong to the same region. The distribution incorporates a measure of disparity between certain spatial features of block pairs of pixel gray levels, using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov nonparametric measures of difference between the distributions of these features. The number of model parameters is minimized by forbidding label configurations, which are assigned probability zero. The maximum a posteriori estimator of boundary placements and partitionings is examined. The forbidden states introduce constraints into the calculation of these configurations. Stochastic relaxation methods are extended to accommodate constrained optimization.>
Donald Geman, Stuart Geman, Christine Graffigne
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1984 Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images
abstract
We make an analogy between images and statistical mechanics systems. Pixel gray levels and the presence and orientation of edges are viewed as states of atoms or molecules in a lattice-like physical system. The assignment of an energy function in the physical system determines its Gibbs distribution. Because of the Gibbs distribution, Markov random field (MRF) equivalence, this assignment also determines an MRF image model. The energy function is a more convenient and natural mechanism for embodying picture attributes than are the local characteristics of the MRF. For a range of degradation mechanisms, including blurring, nonlinear deformations, and multiplicative or additive noise, the posterior distribution is an MRF with a structure akin to the image model. By the analogy, the posterior distribution defines another (imaginary) physical system. Gradual temperature reduction in the physical system isolates low energy states (``annealing''), or what is the same thing, the most probable states under the Gibbs distribution. The analogous operation under the posterior distribution yields the maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimate of the image given the degraded observations. The result is a highly parallel ``relaxation'' algorithm for MAP estimation. We establish convergence properties of the algorithm and we experiment with some simple pictures, for which good restorations are obtained at low signal-to-noise ratios.
Stuart Geman, Donald Geman
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1