Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bassam Jalgha

dblp:77/7248 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 50%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › humanoid robot
fall avoidance
0.112011
A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
humanoid robot
0.112011
A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.112011
A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots · ICRA 2011
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › impedance control
virtual model control
0.112011
A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots · ICRA 2011
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots
abstract
If we are to one day rely on robots as assistive devices they should be capable of mitigating the impact of random disturbances and avoid falling. Humans are surprisingly apt at remaining on their feet when pushed; they rely on reflexes such as bending the ankles and/or the hips, or by taking a step if the magnitude of the disturbance is relatively large. This paper presents a fall avoidance scheme that is capable of applying both ankle and hip strategies on a humanoid robot. While both strategies serve the same purpose, the hip strategy can absorb larger disturbances but has a higher energy overhead and should be avoided when it is not necessary. Our system is capable of detecting at the onset of a disturbance if an ankle or hip strategy is more appropriate. The decision is taken based on a 'decision surface' that is delimited by threshold values of the robot's state variables. The control is based on the intuitive Virtual Model Control (VMC) approach. The system is tested on a simulated robot developed under Gazebo. Results show successful fall avoidance with an ability to choose the optimum fall avoidance strategy.
Bassam Jalgha, Daniel C. Asmar, Imad H. Elhajj
ICRA1