Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bassam Jalgha
dblp:77/7248
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Legged, aerial and field robots · 50% Motion planning and robot control · 50% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › humanoid robot
fall avoidance |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
humanoid robot |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots · ICRA 2011 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › impedance control
virtual model control |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robots · ICRA 2011 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | A hybrid ankle/hip preemptive falling scheme for humanoid robotsabstractIf we are to one day rely on robots as assistive devices they should be capable of mitigating the impact of random disturbances and avoid falling. Humans are surprisingly apt at remaining on their feet when pushed; they rely on reflexes such as bending the ankles and/or the hips, or by taking a step if the magnitude of the disturbance is relatively large. This paper presents a fall avoidance scheme that is capable of applying both ankle and hip strategies on a humanoid robot. While both strategies serve the same purpose, the hip strategy can absorb larger disturbances but has a higher energy overhead and should be avoided when it is not necessary. Our system is capable of detecting at the onset of a disturbance if an ankle or hip strategy is more appropriate. The decision is taken based on a 'decision surface' that is delimited by threshold values of the robot's state variables. The control is based on the intuitive Virtual Model Control (VMC) approach. The system is tested on a simulated robot developed under Gazebo. Results show successful fall avoidance with an ability to choose the optimum fall avoidance strategy. Bassam Jalgha, Daniel C. Asmar, Imad H. Elhajj |
ICRA | 1 |